According to AWST (August 9th) Boeing recently flew 2 X-45A UCAVS in tandem for about 40 minutes in a ramp up to start trying coordinated attacks. The vehicles communicated through data links to maintain thier loose formation and even completed a coordinated turn. The X-45 is competing aginsts the X-47.

Both will have a celing of 40,000 feet and carry 4500 lbs in internal bays and have a range of 3500 miles.

These represent the future for the armed forces. The stealth UCAVS will be able to perform SEAD and other high risk missions as spare our manned planes any unnessesary risk.

I Like Both the X-47B and the X-45C. So I don't care who wins, cause both designs are cool and we could definiatly use them on the war on terrorism.

BTW, I think I read that article and it said that both of them were controlled by a single person. That would really help out during a war with another country but I doubt it would mean anything for the war on terrorism.

Originally posted by Murcielago
BTW, I think I read that article and it said that both of them were controlled by a single person. That would really help out during a war with another country but I doubt it would mean anything for the war on terrorism.

Yeah, but I think two would be the max unless you were a great multitasker. I agree the UCAV is not going to do much with the war on terrorism. However, that armed Predator in Yemen made an impression with its Hellfire. I think they found an axle and some brown stains.

These are open projects, you kind of have to wonder whats flying around that black in the UCAV realm.

Hey you probably know, who heads up the Skunk WOrks these days.

''Both will have a celing of 40,000 feet and carry 4500 lbs in internal bays and have a range of 3500 miles''

Thats some impressive stats for a UAV. What type of bombs will they use 2 x2000lb bombs or more smaller ones?

Its cool that they have already flew in formation I wonder how the Data link works between them?

Originally posted by ShadowXIX
''Both will have a celing of 40,000 feet and carry 4500 lbs in internal bays and have a range of 3500 miles''

Thats some impressive stats for a UAV. What type of bombs will they use 2 x2000lb bombs or more smaller ones?

Its cool that they have already flew in formation I wonder how the Data link works between them?

Not that big. there looking at 250 and 500 pounders.

I like Northop's plane it looks more sexy!

Originally posted by longbow
I like Northop's plane it looks more sexy!

I like Northrops versions better too they are indeed sexy But I have to admit I am bias on the sudject as I have a family member who works there.

I personally like the X-47 it looks futuristic like something out of star wars. If you have 10 of these UAVs flying in to do a stealth bombing mission in a well defended air space, you have 20 JDAM's and ten 500 pound bombs. That is some impressive firepower. You could eliminate a target or multiple targets without putting humans at risk.


[edit on 10-8-2004 by WestPoint23]

Originally posted by WestPoint23
I personally like the X-47 it looks futuristic like something out of star wars. If you have 10 of these UAVs flying in to do a stealth bombing mission in a well defended air space, you have 20 JDAM's and ten 500 pound bombs. That is some impressive firepower do you could eliminate a target or multiple targets without putting humans at risk.

Your assuming that they will be able to fit two 2,000 lb bomb into it, which is very very unlikely. They will use 250 lb'ers. maybe be modified later to hold a 500 lb'er.

and when you say that the X-47 looks futuristic, You must be referring to the A version and not the C version. Because there isn't much of a difference between the X-45C and the X-47B, except of couse the wings look a little different.

But if ya have to pick one I would go with Boeing's X-45C, Because it looks more streamlined, and not like they just slaped the wings on at the last minute.

[edit on 10-8-2004 by Murcielago]

its nice but the X-45C is better looking.

What would you rather have? two 2,000 lb, OR eight 250 lb bombs.

Originally posted by Murcielago
its nice but the X-45C is better looking.
What would you rather have? two 2,000 lb, OR eight 250 lb bombs.

I agree with you on the looks of the X-45C...

Bomb choice would depend on the mission. If two Ucavs were flying, maybe on with the SDB loaded and one with the bunker busters. Maybe a third for SEAD?

agreed. the right tools are needed for the right job. but having one of these with a heap of 250s flying around an infantry platoon or company for support would be great. id like to see how they would be able to
co-ordante the attack of one of these things.
nice pics

Originally posted by Die Trying
agreed. the right tools are needed for the right job. but having one of these with a heap of 250s flying around an infantry platoon or company for support would be great. id like to see how they would be able to
co-ordante the attack of one of these things.
nice pics

Thats a good idea actually. Have an organic force of Close support UCAVS attached to a an infantry brigade. Little Tiltrotor UAV's could provide intel, scouting, precision strike etc etc. for each unit. Coordinating all those aircraft and deconflicting them would be an issue though.

That is a good idea of having some UCAV's to a infantry unit. They could fly ahead and if they spot something just use the hellfire real time. You don't have to call in an air strike and wait for it to come you can control your own air strike form the round.

Originally posted by ShadowXIX
Its cool that they have already flew in formation I wonder how the Data link works between them?

The article did not eloborate. But with one pilot controlling two, I wonder if tehy can dial in a separation idstance, and while in cruise, one will shadow the primary commands to another? Then when in attack formation the pilot switches back and forth as the attack progresses.

Better yet, a two seat F-22 with an escort or two. The backseater could say use one for SEAD, and the other for strike or defence. If a missile locked on, maybe the UCAV could alter its radar return tio attract the missile to it? The number of G's the UCAV could pull during evasive manuvers is pretty impressive.

Sure UCAV's can pull a lot of G's but the one limiting factor in UCAV's today is Speed. The fastest one I think is the Global Hawk around 500-600 MPH, in order to evade a missile UCAV's will have to become supersonic around mach 2. So far they haven't been able to make one go mach two, maybe its because of the size of the UCAV's the engine is not powerful enough.

I'm sure they have supersonic UCAVS, but there still in the Black.

Originally posted by WestPoint23
Sure UCAV's can pull a lot of G's but the one limiting factor in UCAV's today is Speed. The fastest one I think is the Global Hawk around 500-600 MPH, in order to evade a missile UCAV's will have to become supersonic around mach 2. So far they haven't been able to make one go mach two, maybe its because of the size of the UCAV's the engine is not powerful enough.

A pilotless version of the F-16 was experimented with a few years back - so technically you are incorrect. Even Iraq was working on MiG's that were pilotless - and lets not forget the D-21 Recon drone that piggybacked on the SR-71. All these aircraft are supersonic.
(Pilotless = UAV)

[edit on 17-8-2004 by bios]