posted on Sep, 14 2012 @ 12:51 AM
It's an invalid premiss to presume that the emotions a writer would feel when reading or writing an article would be the same as another reader, by
this alone, could signal emotional projection upon the reader, which is a generalization and fallacy.
Especially when putting "A test to show you have a weak mind: Proof." as the title of the thread.
Then type some spurious conditional mumbo jumbo proves not really anything. It proves your PREMISS and CONCLUSION are both INVALID. Since you don't
frame it correctly OR provide evidence to support any of your claims...asking questions does not answer a question.
Oh well, that's my .02cents