It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The computer simulation by researchers at Kyushu University and the University of Tokyo, among other institutions, calculated dispersal of radioactive dust from the Fukushima plant beginning at 9 p.m. on March 14, when radiation levels around the plant spiked. ...
According to the research team, updrafts in a low-pressure system passing over the disaster-stricken Tohoku region on March 14-15 carried some of the radioactive dust that had collected about 1.5 kilometers above the plant to an altitude of about 5 kilometers. The jet stream then caught the dust and diffused it over the Pacific Ocean and beyond.Source
Arnie Gundersen has said that Fukushima is the worst industrial accident in history, and has 20 times more radiation than Chernobyl. Well-known physicist Michio Kaku just confirmed all of the above in a CNN interview:
In the last two weeks, everything we knew about that accident has been turned upside down. We were told three partial melt downs, don’t worry about it. Now we know it was 100 percent core melt in all three reactors. Radiation minimal that was released. Now we know it was comparable to radiation at Chernobyl. Source below
Using the predictive model the spread of air pollution and Asian dust, after 9 pm March 14, jumped the radiation dose around the primary particles was assumed to radioactive material (10 micron particle size, micro-parts per million) Flow Analysis of the weather conditions at the time. Radioactive material with dilute concentrations over the Pacific Ocean, ▽ 1 week after the U.S. west coast ▽ 3 days after the release and spread throughout Europe.
According to the computer model, radioactive materials at a concentration just one-one hundred millionth of that found around the Fukushima plant hit the west coast of North America three days later, and reached the skies over much of Europe about a week later.
Basically they are retarded and know nothing. They delegate their "thinking" to other people to think for them.
And this is what happens, your "thinking master" thinks you should not KNOW the truth and so plants falsehoods within you.
You know when people sit down at TV and say "stop talking I don't want to think anymore I am trying to watch TV and chill I worked all day"? They are the problem.
Please don't be one of those people.
Originally posted by boncho
So instead are you one of those people who believes beforeitisnews.com when they say we are being contaminated by radiation?
Or are you like me waiting to find some credible analysis of the situation?
I have to use common sense to determine if something is true, skewed, or outright impossible. So basically I rely on myself for analysis since no source is 100% credible.
1
Four hundred times more radioactive material was released than had been by the atomic bombing of Hiroshima. The disaster released 1/100 to 1/1000 of the total amount of radioactivity released by nuclear weapons testing during the 1950s and 1960s
Originally posted by boncho
reply to post by boncho
Also, because we know that Chernobyl caused fallout in Canada. It should be no surprise that Japan caused fallout itself. Unfortunately, there has been no credible evidence (to my knowledge) that the level of radiation is worrisome for people in North America.
Chernobyl Fallout
I don't believe in sources. That's for people who cannot think about things and need others to think for them.
Originally posted by boncho
reply to post by muzzleflash
I don't believe in sources. That's for people who cannot think about things and need others to think for them.
Neither does all news web .com or the like.....
Originally posted by boncho
reply to post by muzzleflash
I have to use common sense to determine if something is true, skewed, or outright impossible. So basically I rely on myself for analysis since no source is 100% credible.
I think we know it is possible, likely, and shown that radiation has traveled from Japan across the Ocean.
1
Four hundred times more radioactive material was released than had been by the atomic bombing of Hiroshima. The disaster released 1/100 to 1/1000 of the total amount of radioactivity released by nuclear weapons testing during the 1950s and 1960s
Now, common sense would dictate (if these numbers are accurate) that much more radiation was released in the 1950s and '60s than was released in Chernobyl and Japan, unless Japan had more than 100-1000 times more released than Chernobyl.
With the right information, someone could do an analysis. Including yourself. But until that is done. There is no reason to get your panties in a twist.
Originally posted by boncho
reply to post by muzzleflash
I think I heard this argument before.
"Just believe"... Something like that....
Tell me what has your position on the matter done for you lately?