It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Extremely graphic footage: Libyan children killed by NATO bombs

page: 2
<< 1   >>

log in


posted on Jun, 23 2011 @ 05:51 PM
reply to post by Blaine91555

Do you in all honesty believe NATO went in to Libya for humanitarian reasons? You believe that and I'll show you a real live fairy!

posted on Jun, 23 2011 @ 08:31 PM
It's clear what Russia Today is doing here right?

posted on Jun, 23 2011 @ 09:11 PM
reply to post by Blaine91555

Seriously, what the hell is wrong with you? are you even HUMAN?

Dont take this as an ad-hominem attack...It is a sincere question. Those are BABIES. Not babies loaded up with bombs to kill US soldiers, but babies killed BY bombs..

I am familiar with how wars work. You should be too. That Eagle on your avatar should be ASHAMED to be the mascot of this country...
edit on 23/6/2011 by Lono1 because: added the ad hominem bit

posted on Jun, 23 2011 @ 09:12 PM
reply to post by Blaine91555

I'm well aware of how the conflict started, and I don't agree with you one bit. Let's get some facts together to build a picture.

CIA Finance and Organized Rebels

CIA has financed, trained and organized the rebels to cause chaos and cause a regime change for over 2 decades. This is one fact that most are not even aware of, not surprising, but how else do you suppose WAR PROPAGANDA LIES work? Through ignorance:

Colonel Haftar was the leader of the Libyan National Army, a group of counter-revolutionaries supported and trained by the United States and operating in Libya. According to the sources cited in the article, anti-government uprisings in Libya were led by Colonel Haftar from the United States (The Washington Post 26 Mar. 1996; see also CSR 19 Dec. 1996)


The same rebels tried to create chaos and cause a regime change before, but failed, this time the difference is that NATO came to save them (surely they didn't go to Libya to save civilians), rather to save their own pawns.

This conflict started as a proxy war, and the Libyan regime was not responsible for the proxy war, rather US was. When US was failing twice in its attempt to cause regime change in Libya, it took a different route, that route is a stalemate. I don't know what the purpose of this stalemate is, but I argued in another thread that it could be to divide Libya in to different segments like Sudan.

This is just my belief, but there could be other reasons for it. I believe NATO (mainly US) wants this because they know the rebels have no support in Libya, the Libyan regime has brought prosperity to Libya, (free healthcare, free education, ended water shortages through man-made river project, decreased child mortality, created independent banking system away from International Bankster's control, was planning to create a new currency that would benefit Libya and Africa...). So considering what Libyan regime has done for Libya, to what the rebels have done for Libya, the popularity contest will always lean towards the current regime. That's why they didn't want to accept the regime's offer to solve the stalemate through a vote.

The rebels have been controlling Benghazi through terror and torture, many pro regime demonstrators have been massacred, many tortured, black Libyans facing the worst crimes against humanity because of the WAR PROPAGANDA LIES OF MERCENARIES. Many Black Libyans were labelled as Mercenaries and tortured to death, others hanged in public etc..


posted on Jun, 23 2011 @ 09:38 PM

Originally posted by BlackStar99
It's clear what Russia Today is doing here right?

Yea, telling the truth, something the U.S. media seems to leave out.. No matter what RT's motivation of this coverage is, it is what it is, killing of civilians.. The exact same thing we said we are trying to stop...

posted on Jun, 23 2011 @ 09:44 PM
reply to post by Blaine91555

remember the Viagra lie?

Gaddafi Troops Raping, Issued Viagra: U.S. Envoys
did you promulgate that here one too Blaine?

US intel: No evidence of Viagra as weapon in Libya
How dare gadahffi defend himself or his government eh?
he was framed at lockerbie thats how we role in the U$ of A

Lockerbie Bombing: Libya was Framed
this is about oil and non debt based currency

Libyan Rebels Form Their Own Central Bank
and you are taking the side of
alciaduh AMERICAN KILLERS here

Shocka: Libyan rebels admit al-Qaeda connection, steal SAM's


ps not one russia today in the bunch
only US, and Canadian, sources and i threw in an ultra orthodox jewish blogger in there too

edit on 23-6-2011 by Danbones because: links

edit on 23-6-2011 by Danbones because: links

posted on Jun, 23 2011 @ 10:03 PM
I know this is going to sound very callous but you don't change policy due to unfortunate accidents in a war. Sometimes things go terribly wrong, innocents die. It's unavoidable in war. As others have stated, Qaddafi started this mess. Would you have rather he slaughtered all the residents of Benghazi like he was about to do? Of course there would have been no cameras or photos of his troops butchering those men, women and children, so there wouldn't have been any outcry.

I fault the NATO strategy, they should have used overwhelming force in a very short period of time and destroyed Qaddafi's ability to field an army. I thought that was one of the major things we learned from the first Gulf War. You quickly take out your enemies forces. We took half a step when we needed to take the full step and take him and his government out. We have drawn this out and now things like this errant bomb happen.

posted on Jun, 23 2011 @ 10:08 PM
reply to post by pavil

All they really had to do is nab Ghddafi and his crew while pitching up their tents during their visits to other countries or better still, offer them a private plane thats in need of maintinence

edit on 23-6-2011 by bluemirage5 because: (no reason given)

posted on Jun, 23 2011 @ 10:12 PM
reply to post by confreak

I am about to cry right now those poor children

Those are the innocent lives lost right now. There are people on ATS right now who I am talking with in other threads who think that this Libyan war is justified. I mean seriously. My heart hurts

posted on Jun, 23 2011 @ 11:39 PM

Originally posted by Blaine91555
reply to post by confreak

Third, Qaddafi has in fact committed acts of war against the West and that is general knowledge.

Blaine you are going to have to do better that that buddy - 'general knowledge'

US ran an illegal unprovoked and attempted secret (but botched) F 111 bombing strike on Tripoli in the 80's

they - emphasis on 'they' - MSM - say, Libyan response was the pan-am lockerbie bombing

the real criminal is the big banks who have co-erced US Presidents into sending the good people of the USA into war, provoked or unprovoked to borrow more money and boost the economy by creating more guns, missles, planes, ammo, bombs etc etc
- examples include

Lusitania setup -> US enters WW1
Pearl Harbour setup -> US enters WW2

Quaddafi is recognised as king of Africa - how about applying "qui bono & follow the $$$" to this situation?

nothing to do with Africa / middle east wishing to create a gold based currency with which one must purchase oil from them now, is it?

sure, the US has guns and tanks and bombs, which can be produced in exchange for credits of fiat currency

- but they have stuff-all gold mate

Why should America care when it murders OVER 1 million of its own children every year by abortion? - and that is general knowledge..........
edit on 23-6-2011 by Highlander64 because: (no reason given)

posted on Jun, 24 2011 @ 08:17 AM
Hmm, we can debate all we want about how it all started...

But if you really think America is over there to provide HUMANITARIAN AID you need to wake up and smell the coffee.


I think the whole world knows what drives America. Profit. And you know it.
America leaves death and destruction where ever it goes, and my suspicions are the Libyans were better off before the US and NATO arrived. Certainly the ones in this vid were.

Why do they feel the need to get involved in everyone elses affairs?
They didnt like that communism to much did they?
They dont like these here "Dictators" do they?

Who the hell decided everyone has to live by American rules?
To busy in everyone elses affairs to properly care for the people they have back home.

I see they havent made any moves to force there own ideas on China or Russia yet....O yea...thats because they only bully the ones that cant defend them selves.

Sorry but If I belived in the Devil I'd call it America. Give it ten years and the middle east will be American controlled, you wont be able to sh** without there say so. I hope the commies kick there ass.

top topics

<< 1   >>

log in