It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

"The ATS thought police has removed this subject" :D

page: 1
7
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 22 2011 @ 11:13 PM
link   
Oh ROFL!!! I just got that screen when a thread was removed! " The ATS thought police has removed this subject" and the fancy men in black pic.


Oh for the love of God.. you guys are gonna set the "ATS is cointelpro and a govt op" folks on fire!



It is pretty sharp looking. Kinda scary... intimidating even.


** looks around suspiciously and runs out of thread**




posted on Jun, 22 2011 @ 11:23 PM
link   
What is frustrating is when you have the screen up and you are reading and go to respond and it happens!


Makes me wish I could cache the page and get more details because most times it is just as juicy as a burger!

Today it was the Ron Paul and Barney Frank one! Oh well, I really think that anything these two do is for a vote and not based on Truth anyways!

edit on 6/22/2011 by Greensage because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 22 2011 @ 11:26 PM
link   

edit on 23-6-2011 by LadySkadi because: run, run away!



posted on Jun, 22 2011 @ 11:31 PM
link   
WHo cares about the cache
The new 404 pic is awesome



posted on Jun, 22 2011 @ 11:35 PM
link   

edit on 23-6-2011 by LadySkadi because: run, run away!



posted on Jun, 22 2011 @ 11:50 PM
link   
The guy mentioned "he might not be like"?
I understood fast enough when he stated that he support the government for not telling the truth about stuff like BP oil spill.
I mean its clearly a support for ignorance and a good thing he got spot early.
Anyway, i expect alot of weird stuff this summer.



posted on Jun, 23 2011 @ 12:22 AM
link   
Some of the female MODS had requested a better representation in the new 404 image in another thread discussing the new 404 so I coaxed out a female for them




edit on 23-6-2011 by SLAYER69 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 23 2011 @ 02:15 AM
link   
reply to post by Advantage
 


Cool, looks like ATS are on the ball for the 2012 elections..
We don't need forums full of lies and propaganda..



posted on Jun, 23 2011 @ 02:37 AM
link   
When I was a mod SkepticOverlord made us wear black suits and only appear in conveniently concealing silhouette situations. It's some kind of CIA tactic.



posted on Jun, 23 2011 @ 03:30 AM
link   
reply to post by projectvxn
 


Nah. Apparently SO spent so much of ATS' money on those black suits we couldn't afford to pay the power bill...so the lack of lighting isn't intentional at all...it got cut off until we set up some sort of payment schedule...





posted on Jun, 23 2011 @ 03:40 AM
link   
reply to post by alien
 


What about the sunglasses?
Them designer shades cost more than most suits.



posted on Jun, 23 2011 @ 06:34 AM
link   
They might want to check the grammar- shouldn't it be "have removed", not "has"?.........



posted on Jun, 23 2011 @ 08:51 AM
link   
reply to post by Skippy1138
 


No, because it's really only one guy.



posted on Jun, 23 2011 @ 09:06 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jun, 23 2011 @ 01:30 PM
link   


So....

Finally the TRUTH comes out



posted on Jun, 23 2011 @ 02:08 PM
link   
reply to post by yeahright
 


One guy? What does that even mean?

Police is plural. Unless it clearly isn't. (An example of singular "police" is rare in common usage. Like when you are comparing categories, ie, police and military, etc. You need to use the word "force" or something like it, like "department", to make it singular--it is not implied without strong context)

Just say it without the qualifiers..."police has removed..." Does that not sound wrong? That's because it is. Put it in present tense to amplify---"police is removing..."


We always use a plural verb with police: • The police have arrested a friend of mine, (not 'The police has') • Do you think the police are well-paid? Note that a person in the police is 'a policeman / a policewoman / a police officer' (not 'a police').

www.tolearnenglish.com...

I thought it was just the OP when I clicked it...c'mon folks.

Deny the ignorance of bad grammar!



posted on Jun, 23 2011 @ 02:12 PM
link   

Originally posted by joechip
(An example of singular "police" is rare in common usage. Like when you are comparing categories, ie, police and military, etc. You need to use the word "force" or something like it, like "department", to make it singular--it is not implied without strong context)


The ATS Thought Police is a department, so it's singular.




posted on Jun, 23 2011 @ 02:14 PM
link   
reply to post by SLAYER69
 


yes better represenation - props to YOU....but what is up with the looooooong skirt

Not that I would want a mini on there....but but



posted on Jun, 23 2011 @ 02:17 PM
link   
reply to post by greeneyedleo
 


Yes, do tell us more about your taste in skirts.


Is the tight-fitting mid-thigh variety more appropriate for your thought policing? It must be, because that is the only thing I can think about now. Oh no.....it is working! Get out of my head.



posted on Jun, 23 2011 @ 02:19 PM
link   

Originally posted by getreadyalready
reply to post by greeneyedleo
 


Yes, do tell us more about your taste in skirts.


Is the tight-fitting mid-thigh variety more appropriate for your thought policing? It must be, because that is the only thing I can think about now. Oh no.....it is working! Get out of my head.



Just looks very old and matronly
Even a nice pant suit would work


No offense to Slayer...he improved it for sure




top topics



 
7
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join