It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by nixie_nox
reply to post by christine76
You *knew* you were going to an airport. You *knew* there would be agents there doing searches. You know that a federal agency is running security there. You WILLINGLY went. No one stripped your rights honey, you walked right into it.
this is nothing but a flag and star generating thread. Like claiming that the agent looked upset giving you a pat down. She has done that a hundred times to other dramatic mothers like you, she could care less.
As for your rights being trampled on, they are not. There are fourth amendment rights that protect you against unreasonable search and seizures, but they also give the government the the right to search if they are suspcious.
You are given ample warning of these searches when you buy the ticket and get the information about your flight.
The government also has a duty to not discriminate, which means you don't have to wear a burka to be considered a threat as a woman. And if you think terrorists wouldn't use children, you got another think coming, because soldiers from any war could tell you they do.
You are not the only person getting on that plane, they have to ensure the safety of everyone getting on that plane. There would be no point to circumventing safety measures simply because you have a toddler with you. Your privacy rights of the fourth amendment are against the safety of everyone on that plane.
As for people saying that these agents have never caught a terrorist, they catch people every single day trying to circumvent the security. Trying to smuggle things on they shouldn't, are being hassled. And people constantly ignoring warnings.
So whose to say how many nutjobs they have kept from stabbing the guy next to him with a pen knife, or even accidently.
You have bought tickets to a private company. Yet when people walk into department stores, they don't balk at the security tags or the alarms at every instance because it is for product theft, and it is a private entity.
Airports are the only exception to the fourth amendment. The second you step into an airport, you are giving permission for a random search and seizure.
These laws have been in effect long before 911, for forty years now in fact. And they have held up all 40 years. So no, 911 was not an excuse to strip liberties at airports, the searches were always there for the same reasons. It just amped up the technology to do so.
When you choose to buy an airline ticket, you are consenting to any search in the secured area of the airport.
For future reference, once you place your items on the table to be screened, you no longer have the right to refuse the screening and search.
Freedom of Speech is also reduced in an airport. Which is why you can't say anything you want. Though maintained by the taxpayers, airports are not considered public property and therefore are not subject to the same rights.
Originally posted by christine76
reply to post by Ryanp5555
How can I sue the TSA? Is my account enough? I don't have pictures. Of course, I suppose there are security cameras at the airport that may have recorded the incident. I am not entirely against the idea of a lawsuit..
Originally posted by christine76
Originally posted by Fatgoblin
Originally posted by gentledissident
BTW, why would you doubt you'd be attracted to Christine?
Apart from the melodrama and paranoia maybe I would be attracted to her. Hey Christine, got any pics?
Here you go, me on vacation. I tried to make it smaller, but oh well...
Originally posted by JibbyJedi
Where does this end? Home searches and video monitoring, or basically the worst parts of China coming to the USA & UK.
Originally posted by sacecowboy
reply to post by christine76
I would like to ask one simple question, and it is not rhetorical. I would like an answer to the question of, how on earth did you ever give birth to those two boys? that must have been the most humiliating thing to have endured, with all those people touching you and looking at your naked lady parts. I guess that gynecologist probably only go to school to look at naked women too? As has been stated over and over in this thread, it is not a right to fly. Flying with a commercial air line is a choice, and privilege. If you do not like the steps one must take to board the craft, then you have the choice of not flying. I await my answer.
Originally posted by Esotericizm
reply to post by christine76
I've read every post in this topic and not once in your op does it mention that they were "Silent Tears". Matter of fact you make it sound like you were in hysterics. I also dont understand what your getting at. If you had of either asked your 9 year old to look after your 21 month old or reassured them both that it was okay, then i bet it would have been over a whole lot quicker. I dont think im any better than you or anyone else on this forum, but i do know that you handled the situation wrongly and now your after attention. You were told what was going to happen if you came in contact with another person but you let it happen anyway (granted it was a small child and ill give you some leeway there), I honestly think you handled it badly and i really would suggest some valium or xannax next time you think about travelling.
Originally posted by Ryanp5555
Originally posted by nixie_nox
reply to post by christine76
The government also has a duty to not discriminate, which means you don't have to wear a burka to be considered a threat as a woman. And if you think terrorists wouldn't use children, you got another think coming, because soldiers from any war could tell you they do.
First of all, the use of children is speculation by you. I have not once heard of a single story about children being used as terrorist tools and I've talked to many people about their experiences in Iraq and Afghanistan.
In the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Palestinian militant groups have recruited minors to attack Israeli targets, both military and civilian, especially during the Second Intifada. In some cases these attacks have been suicidal in nature. This deliberate involvement of children in armed conflict has been condemned by international organisations and certain Palestinian groups.
source:
en.wikipedia.org...
2nd article;
KAMPALA, Uganda -(Dow Jones)- Somalia's al Qaeda-inspired al
Shabab militants have in recent weeks resorted to abducting
children to serve as fighters and suicide bombers, an African
Union military spokesman said Thursday.
Major Barigye Ba-Hoku, a spokesman for the union's peacekeeping
mission in Somalia, said al Shabab militants were "desperate"
after a failed offensive during the Islamic holy month of
Ramadan. During the fighting in August and September, AU-backed
government forces regained control of many key positions, he
said.
"To compensate for their current weakness and lack of support
from the local communities, whom they have brutalized, the
militants have resorted to abducting and brainwashing children to
serve as fighters and suicide bombers. This is against all
civilized norms and international conventions," Ba-Hoku said in a
statement.
grendelreport.posterous.com...
edit on 23-6-2011 by works4dhs because: (no reason given)edit on 23-6-2011 by works4dhs because: (no reason given)edit on 23-6-2011 by works4dhs because: (no reason given)