It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Police Arrest Woman For Videotaping Them From Her Front Yard: (Wait till you see this tape!)

page: 30
143
<< 27  28  29    31  32  33 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 23 2011 @ 01:16 PM
link   

Originally posted by 3xil3

Originally posted by shauny

Originally posted by 3xil3
WAIT so this chick decides she wants to be a douche just for #s and giggles and videotapes cops while they are doing their job and from the video.... doing nothing wrong to person of interest
THEN they have a point WTF is this crazy chick doing... i would be the same way then she is deliberately pushing their buttons and IMO interfering with them doing their JOB.

THen she gets her ass in trouble the plays the victim and starts crying and doesn't under stand whats going on im sorry but she is attention whore who wanted to be cool to post on youtube
she got what was coming


I'm not sticking up for cops i agree cops videos latly are showing cops over using and over stepping their boundaries but but definitely not sticking up for some attention seeking weirdo
edit on 23-6-2011 by 3xil3 because: (no reason given)


I think the woman was just standing up for her rights.


yea with a camera she knew exactly what she was doing and what the consequences are when you interferer with police doing there job im sorry like i said before there are videos that show cops up to know good this is not one of them this is more like premeditated setup

karma is a bitch i hope she is in desperate need of police assistance one day
edit on 23-6-2011 by 3xil3 because: (no reason given)


But she was standing up for her rights, and commiting NO crime.
Is there a law in the US saying you cant film the police from your own land?
Tell me there is, and I will end this discussion.




posted on Jun, 23 2011 @ 01:29 PM
link   
reply to post by shauny
 


They didnt stop the filming, it continued after she was arrested. They just stopped her. Once again, whats the back story? There has got to be more going on then meets the eye.



posted on Jun, 23 2011 @ 01:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by coop039
reply to post by shauny
 


They didnt stop the filming, it continued after she was arrested. They just stopped her. Once again, whats the back story? There has got to be more going on then meets the eye.


You would think so. I couldnt believe they took her and let someone else carry on filming.
Maybe just a pi((ed of policeman making up rules as he goes?



posted on Jun, 23 2011 @ 01:54 PM
link   
I would have felt unsafe too..that lady had a camera in her hand and you know how dangerous they are.

Next they'll be trying to pass a camera ban lol.

I still don't get why he felt unsafe.And he was the only one that felt unsafe.The other cops didn't say nothing.As a matter a fact they look like they looking at the cop like "are you serious"?



posted on Jun, 23 2011 @ 01:59 PM
link   
Haven't read ALL the comments, but people keep mentioning the "false report" every other thread it seems. Has it occurred to anyone here that maybe the individual seen in the video could have been the third temporarily detained? Maybe the other two were detained before the camera came on. Is that a remote possibility? If it is, then the perjury argument is void.



posted on Jun, 23 2011 @ 02:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by GodIsPissed
I would have felt unsafe too..that lady had a camera in her hand and you know how dangerous they are.

Next they'll be trying to pass a camera ban lol.

I still don't get why he felt unsafe.And he was the only one that felt unsafe.The other cops didn't say nothing.As a matter a fact they look like they looking at the cop like "are you serious"?




Actually you're getting pretty close to what will be installed soon. Pretty soon it will go before the Supreme Court and there will be legislation passed making filming of police....no that would be too slap in the face....they'll probably broaden it to include all public servants.



posted on Jun, 23 2011 @ 02:12 PM
link   
reply to post by EmeraldGreen
 


as usual for the defenders of these brutes

we are supposed to empathize,

they, on the other hand mostly being sociopaths if not outright psychopaths are under no such obligation.

[like that "poor, misunderstood" she-cop who uploaded her homemade kiddie porn of her beating her naked and bound children to a fetish site.]Cop tied naked children to desk and beat them with various sex toys while filming it



news flash in order for us to be able to empathize with socio- and psycho-paths we would have to be socio- and psycho-paths ourselves.

or severely lacking upstairs.


but don't worry:

Memo to the Victims: You Yourselves Will Pay for the Crimes of the Ruling Class


Focus on the critical sentence: "Yet, when a victim explodes or acts out in unacceptable ways, these same officials are shocked and indignant."

What exactly are these "unacceptable ways" of exploding or acting out? Who decided they were "unacceptable"? Why is it that "reluctant school officials" will not "take definitive action" against the bullies -- thus tacitly conceding that the bullying itself is not all that "unacceptable" -- while the same officials are "shocked and indignant" when the victim protests too strongly?

This pattern, and certain of its origins, will be found throughout history, in every culture around the world. The pattern is a simple and deadly one: the oppressor -- that is, those who are in the superior position, whether they are parents, school officials, or the government, or in a superior position merely by virtue of physical strength -- may inflict bodily harm and/or grievous, lifelong emotional and psychological injury, but the victim may only protest within the limits set by the oppressor himself. The oppressor will determine those forms of protest by the victim that are "acceptable."

You see this pattern with regard to many helpless, lonely children in addition to Billy Wolfe...
The oppressor may inflict unimaginable cruelties on innocent victims -- but the victims may only protest in ways which the oppressor deems "acceptable." The profound injustice is obvious, but not in itself remarkable or unexpected: this is how oppression operates. But ask yourself about the deeper reason for the prohibition. This is of the greatest importance: the victims may only protest within a constricted range of "permissible" behavior because, when they exceed the prescribed limits, they make the oppressors too uncomfortable. They force the oppressors to confront the nature of what they, the oppressors, have done in ways that the oppressors do not choose to face.

Take some time to appreciate the unfathomable cruelty of this pattern. You may be grievously harmed and even permanently damaged by the actions of those who hold unanswerable power -- but you may only speak about this evil and its effects within the very narrow limits set by those who would destroy you. If you are killed, the identical prohibitions apply to those who still manage to survive and who would protest the unforgivable crime committed against you. In this manner, the complacency and comfort of those who possess immense power and wealth are underwritten by the silence forced upon their victims. The victims may speak and even protest, but only within severely circumscribed limits, and only so long as their rulers are not made to feel too uncomfortable, or too guilty. Anything which approaches too close to the truth is strictly forbidden.



posted on Jun, 23 2011 @ 02:21 PM
link   
The whole thing was stupid.... thats all, nothing here, move along..



posted on Jun, 23 2011 @ 02:25 PM
link   
People, you need to avoid the police when you have the chance to do so. They're other citizens doing their jobs, although they have different psychological characteristics while on duty. Police know that most of society feels negatively towards them, and as long as they are pestered, they will bite back. Some not as much as others, but they will.
The woman in this video was in her rights, but because she was so stubborn with her actions in persisting to film the officers, it was her own fault she got handcuffed. When you get the opportunity to remove your presence from a police officer, do so.

They aren't your friends.



posted on Jun, 23 2011 @ 02:29 PM
link   

Originally posted by FactOrFaked21
People, you need to avoid the police when you have the chance to do so. They're other citizens doing their jobs, although they have different psychological characteristics while on duty. Police know that most of society feels negatively towards them, and as long as they are pestered, they will bite back. Some not as much as others, but they will.
The woman in this video was in her rights, but because she was so stubborn with her actions in persisting to film the officers, it was her own fault she got handcuffed. When you get the opportunity to remove your presence from a police officer, do so.

They aren't your friends.


Do you live in a developed country?

Because you have no idea what rights are if you want people to shut up, stop using them, and go away and hide.



posted on Jun, 23 2011 @ 02:52 PM
link   
reply to post by kro32
 


you and anyone else making this argument are being intentionally obtuse

a cop is a public servant accountable to the public, some one eating at a restaurant is a private citizen enjoying his/her privacy

as for a fast food joint well they are filming you too.

but then cops, and those who worship them, aren't exactly known for their intelligence. in fact standards of intelligence have been continually lowered for quite awhile.

utter fail



posted on Jun, 23 2011 @ 03:12 PM
link   
reply to post by Xcathdra
 


simple YOU ARE NOT THE LAW.

you are merely an agent.



posted on Jun, 23 2011 @ 03:17 PM
link   
reply to post by Zanti Misfit
 


ahhhh!!!!


copied

breoopp!!!!


saved

and starred



posted on Jun, 23 2011 @ 03:37 PM
link   

Originally posted by DerepentLEstranger
reply to post by kro32
 


you and anyone else making this argument are being intentionally obtuse

a cop is a public servant accountable to the public, some one eating at a restaurant is a private citizen enjoying his/her privacy

as for a fast food joint well they are filming you too.

but then cops, and those who worship them, aren't exactly known for their intelligence. in fact standards of intelligence have been continually lowered for quite awhile.

utter fail


By grouping all cops, and the people that support law enforcement into one group, and insulting their intelligence........



You just proved your own.........



posted on Jun, 23 2011 @ 03:57 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jun, 23 2011 @ 03:58 PM
link   
reply to post by Thunder heart woman
 


had to stop watching at :46 this kind of video seriously angers me

rest assured if i ever have the misfortune of witnessing something like this

the offending officers will be educated in the true meaning of the words:

Police Action




posted on Jun, 23 2011 @ 04:04 PM
link   
reply to post by Xcathdra
 



and people should understand that the Us Supreme Court has ruled many times now that an officer is not here to protect the individual, but society as a whole.


society is an abstraction, you may have well have said:

''an officer is not here to protect the individual, but an illusion''

mental masturbation IMO
edit on 23-6-2011 by DerepentLEstranger because: added edit & important additional comment



posted on Jun, 23 2011 @ 04:08 PM
link   
reply to post by ManBehindTheMask
 




you are mincing words, go check my threads,


"you are dismissed"



posted on Jun, 23 2011 @ 04:15 PM
link   
reply to post by EmeraldGreen
 

Are you on medication?
Are you even seeing the same tape we are?
This lady couldnt have been LESS 'threatening if she was his own mother, Rage Against The Machine ?
Gues what America...you are F U C % # E D! You wont wake up and get all Che Guevara, there isnt going to be some sort of half arsed Mad Max retribution on these guys, its a done deal and you werent even at the card table!



posted on Jun, 23 2011 @ 04:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by Kitilani

Originally posted by Manhater
Didn't know there was 4 people in the car, that situation could of gotten ugly very quickly, all from this lady.


Now there were 4 people in the car? When did that happen? Even the police only claimed 3. Apparently no one saw the other two. But you raised it to 4? Do you need to defend this cop that badly that you have to make up stuff too now?



Excuse me, I thought you said 3 were in the car and 1, was in cuffs with the police. Pardon me. Still could of gotten out of hand because she wanted and chose to be stupid. I only saw 3 cops there in the video. I'm not perfect..



new topics

top topics



 
143
<< 27  28  29    31  32  33 >>

log in

join