posted on Jun, 29 2011 @ 06:41 PM
Inside the earth, there is a nuclear oven ... whatever the workings of it, it is the cause of the inner movement that causes the magnetic field.
Whatever the workings of it, or whatever sort of nuclear fission or fusion occurs, a hypothesis. What cannot be ignored, is that space is not a
vaccuum. Space is full of matter, dust, particles ... that bombard the planet. Our plants take up energy from the sun, to build molecules and
bindings, that eventually build up the mold we walk on, and plant our crops in. Subduction of this matter, creates fuel for the inner mechanism, and
eventually creates new sediment within the cracks of the outer crust.
The expansion of the earth, is obvious ... without it, there would be no planet. The planet must have been created from particles from the Big Bang,
within the space. However note, that the space we live in, is equal to the dot of the original plasma, before the Big Bang. The material is
equivalent, only the densitiy within this droplet that collects as water driplets on glass that collects in places, creating space in between.
Material from other driplets, collecting into making the earth ... a process, that must be an ongoing process ...
The gravity of the earth is increasing, this is why our ancestors could build stonehenge with their bare hands and stoneage tools. This is why the
Pyramids could be built, and why the dynosaurs were larger. The fact, we can see this, and the fact we wrote the hystory, and this happened in our
ancestors memory. Suggests that our "aging" of these things is wrong.
However the earth expansion theory, exagerates the size of the globe in the beginning. It does not take into account, that mountains need to be
flattened out and the mantle need to be evened out. If this is taken into account, you would get a much more "reasonable" globe size, and the
theory woul start to fit more with reality. However, to be noted, is that the expansion occurring is an event that started after the mantle cooled
enough to make a crust ... suggesting a recent change in the inner core.
What is more interresting in my opinion, is the effect the magnetic field has on a falling "ice cube". This ice cube, would fall on the north or
south pole, depending on the direction of the magnetic field (i.e. wether the magnetic south, is south or north as it is today). If such an "ice
cube" (comet part, or asteroid) falls on the poles ... the ice would make an instant icing ... which explains why the mammuts froze while eating. It
also explains why there are "several" ice ages. And the global warming is therefore a natural phenomenon, between these there is a normal warming
Everything we see, has a natural explanation ... the mechanism in the earth will always be hypothesized, until we can fully recreate it ourselves, or
see it for ourselves ... but it is, non the less, there ...
We can thank our luck, that we are not walking on continental plates that float on hot lava and may sink if we tip it too far :-)