posted on Jul, 29 2011 @ 10:49 AM
Originally posted by ShaunHatfield
reply to post by MrWendal
We saw the impact.. to answer the poster above..
I have typed out my description of the day 10 different times under 2 different names here on ATS. I do not have any plans to get into a pecker
measuring contest over facts and theories. Believe me or don't, I dont give 2 flips, just know that all of you with these facts, are like me showing
you the bible as proof of god.. complete BS!!!
no, but if you're gonna come to a discussion board and tell a story that supports the OS, you better be prepared to answer questions and give more
details without attitude or defensiveness.
So no doubt if you "SAW" the impact, you should be able to corroborate the SAME basic details that others had ESPECIALLY Mike the reporter.
you should also be able to give a detailed POV which so far i haven't seen yet.
be able to address Lloyds obvious contradictions and virtual confession
be able to address the hole before the collapse and fact the plane didn't fit.
be able to address the contradictory testimony of witnesses
why the lawn was virtually untouched
show exactly how and where CIT's presentation and argument is wrong on about the NOC flight path.
explain how the punch out hole was created
and where your witness account was recorded and if not, why.
If your'e a legitimate witness, these basic issues should be very easy to do