It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Truthers NEVER watch videos debunking their theories, because if they realized the whole time that they were SO wrong SO silly it would be an UNBEARABLE blow to the ego due to the emotional investment in the truth movement.
Originally posted by SkepticAndBeliever
Truthers NEVER watch videos debunking their theories, because if they realized the whole time that they were SO wrong SO silly it would be an UNBEARABLE blow to the ego due to the emotional investment in the truth movement. Imagine if you spent years believing 911 was an inside job just to be disproven easily by scientists? that's unbearable to the mind beyond believe! The human brain actually protects you from feeling like that , therefor inciting truthers to NEVER buy the debunking, because if they did, their whole world would shatter. I's been proven that only weak minds believe huge conspiracy theories. the truth movement is all physiological and their emotional investment protects them from the facts, which is why dumb people STILL believe there was a conspiracy to this day.edit on 20-6-2011 by SkepticAndBeliever because: (no reason given)
I's been proven that only weak minds believe huge conspiracy theories. the truth movement is all physiological and their emotional investment protects them from the facts, which is why dumb people STILL believe there was a conspiracy to this day.
"Smart people believe weird things because they are skilled at defending beliefs they arrived at for non-smart reasons."
Originally posted by ExPostFacto
reply to post by Immortalgemini527
You still need to overcome the many pilots that have stated a jet liner flying that close to the ground could not have maintained the steady path just feet above the ground, especially when piloted by inexperienced pilots.
Explain to me why plane wings do not break when hitting poles, yet the wings cannot break a window near where they should have hit the building.
If you actually look at the damage it is not consistence with something going through, you can see columns pushed outwards. IF a missile entered the building and exploded on the inside that is how it would look. The damage is too low for the wings to have done it, the plane would have to have been actually on the ground with the engines digging into the grass, yet there wasn't any damage to the lawn at all. Does that tell you anything?
Originally posted by AlexKintner
reply to post by SkepticAndBeliever
So in the time I added a quote you read the segment of the article and responded twice? Must be trollin'.
Originally posted by Darth_Prime
If i Created a 'Computer Animated' Picture of a Missile Hitting the Pentagon wold that be 'conclusive Evidence' and Sway your mind?
The 911 pentagon conspiracy is finally over with.
Originally posted by ANOK
How does that vid prove anything?
Where is the explanation of the physics that allows the carbon-fiber nose of the plane to punch though reinforced concrete, but not the engines and wing spars, and are not to found in front of the pentagon?
What physics allowed the plane to punch through, but then disintegrate on the inside where there was nothing but columns and empty space.
Did that vid even address these points?
Originally posted by R3N3G4D3
Originally posted by Immortalgemini527
A missile would not have hit so many objects going towards the pentagon if it was a missile.
Now this statement I figured was reasonable as I thought, yeah that's true enough. You almost had me. Until BIRDS! Birds fly into airplane engines and have the power to bring them down, but metal poles are just sheared in half? I don't buy that.
We won't find out the truth about 9/11 until someone steps forward because how likely the perpetrators would keep evidence?