Prestigious doctor: US nuclear 'Baby valley of death,' Millions to die, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 139 times


reply posted on 20-6-2011 @ 02:39 PM by adeclerk
reply to post by Mdv2



I totally and completely trust this site, where any member may post any unsubstantiated rubbish that they would like.

You have to evaluate your sources, man.


reply posted on 20-6-2011 @ 02:43 PM by Aeons
Originally posted by adeclerk
reply to
post by Mdv2



I totally and completely trust this site, where any member may post any unsubstantiated rubbish that they would like.

You have to evaluate your sources, man.


Sources matter.

Sometimes a questionable source is your best source, because all the other good sources are BLOCKADING good information. Sometimes a questionable source is the only point where the information can get out.

Question your questionable sources. But qustion your good sources too. When the good sources are all owned by people who have masive stock in the companies pulling this crap, the credible sources motives make them far less credible.


reply posted on 20-6-2011 @ 02:44 PM by boncho
reply to post by boncho



Or is today April Fools?

The prestigious, honorable Dr. Sircus

Dr. Sircus Ac., OMD, is director of International Medical Veritas Association (IMVA) www.imva.info... He was trained in acupuncture and oriental medicine at Institute of Traditional Medicine in Sante Fe, N.M., and at the School of Traditional Medicine of New England in Boston.



reply posted on 20-6-2011 @ 02:45 PM by Jordan River
Originally posted by boncho
reply to
post by boncho



Or is today April Fools?

The prestigious, honorable Dr. Sircus

Dr. Sircus Ac., OMD, is director of International Medical Veritas Association (IMVA) www.imva.info... He was trained in acupuncture and oriental medicine at Institute of Traditional Medicine in Sante Fe, N.M., and at the School of Traditional Medicine of New England in Boston.



shows over folks



reply posted on 20-6-2011 @ 02:47 PM by boncho
reply to post by boncho



Let's not forget to take some advice Dr. Sircus!



(From his website, where he is the director)

Claudia - IMVA Staff said: Dear Jennifer, We have seen research stating that sodium bicarbonate does not increase blood pressure, contrary to allopathic thinking, but you should always monitor bp when using it to be sure. You need a consultation with Dr. Sircus to learn the specific dosages needed for your father in his particular circumstances….but yes, sodium bicarbonate can help his cancer. Or you can start out by reading the book on sodium bicarbonate and cancer treatment: sodiumbicarbonate.imva.info...



reply posted on 20-6-2011 @ 02:51 PM by boncho
reply to post by boncho



No wonder they want everyone to get cancer... They found the cure!




Now refer back to my first post.

Who flags this poop?


reply posted on 20-6-2011 @ 02:51 PM by getreadyalready
reply to post by adeclerk



Actually, I hold ATS to be a valuable and reliable source, and we have broken some major stories here on ATS first, and we have been featured and sourced in MSM.......while at the same time, it would be very simple to show some of our most outrageous headlines and claims and discredit us as a source.

In other words, sometimes a source can be correct and valuable and easy to discredit all at the same time.


reply posted on 20-6-2011 @ 02:53 PM by Aeons
reply to post by adeclerk



I don't care about the doctor, nor the examiner.

The essential information remains true. The goal posts for radiation exposure have been altered, and it has been done because the minimum levels are now useless for the next 10,000 years.

You can hide real information by associating it with the uncredible.

The information remains true. And the tactical advantage of having it associated with the ridiculous so that people discount is just too awesome.
edit on 2011/6/20 by Aeons because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 20-6-2011 @ 02:54 PM by adeclerk
Originally posted by getreadyalready
reply to
post by adeclerk



Actually, I hold ATS to be a valuable and reliable source, and we have broken some major stories here on ATS first, and we have been featured and sourced in MSM.......while at the same time, it would be very simple to show some of our most outrageous headlines and claims and discredit us as a source.

In other words, sometimes a source can be correct and valuable and easy to discredit all at the same time.

Oh really, I'd love to read the articles if you have some links handy.


reply posted on 20-6-2011 @ 02:55 PM by adeclerk
Originally posted by Aeons
reply to
post by adeclerk



I don't care about the doctor, nor the examiner.

The essential information remains true. The goal posts for radiation exposure have been altered, and it has been done because the minimum levels are now useless for the next 10,000 years.

You can hide real information by associating it with the uncredible.

The information remains true. And the tactical advantage of having it associated with the ridiculous so that people discount is just too awesome.
edit on 2011/6/20 by Aeons because: (no reason given)

Do you have a source for any of this information? Because it's sounding like unsubstantiated bullocks to me.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



Iranian sailors chase off pirates attacking U.S. ship
  Posted 4 days ago with 94 member flags
Congressmen Seek To Lift Propaganda Ban
  Posted 8 days ago with 73 member flags
Man Loses $22,000 In New \'Policing For Profit\' Case
  Posted 6 days ago with 63 member flags
Bin Laden died of natural causes: Former CIA agent
  Posted 8 days ago with 58 member flags
3 NATO Protesters Face Terror Conspiracy Charges
  Posted 9 days ago with 46 member flags