 |
|
Topic started on 9-8-2004 @ 06:36 AM by FlyersFan
|
www.drudgereport.com...
Kerry testified that he was on a super secret mission, illegally going
into Cambodia on Christmas during his four months in Vietnam.
The truth - he was no where near Cambodia. He was 50 miles
away, writing in his journal during the time he was supposed
to be on the super secret illegal spy mission into Cambodia.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 9-8-2004 @ 08:01 AM by Mirthful Me
|
Just rolling out the "Red Carpet" for the John Kerry apologists, too bad all this vetting couldn't have occurred before Iowa, then maybe... never
mind... all the other candidates were "uniquely unqualified as well". Take solace in the fact that he is running against George Bush, imagine where
this campaign would be headed against a serious Republican incumbent. Time to get the "Hillary 2008" banners going.
Commence flame.
Sea Monkeys, not just for rip-off ads in the back of comic books anymore...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 9-8-2004 @ 08:33 AM by FredT
|
What I find interesting is that the vilification of the swift boat sailors who dare come out against Kerry is begining. Funny how the media will take
Kerry at his word about his Vietnam experience, but question integrity of the swift boat vets. Interesting that of all the vets on the boat, what like
one will actually vote for him?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 9-8-2004 @ 08:50 AM by curme
|
UNFIT OF COMMAND
Only $19.01 at
AMAZON

From the Publisher
Find out why John Kerry is Unfit for Command as told by the men who served with him
Unfit for Command reveals a John Kerry you don't know-the true John Kerry that his political image-makers are trying to hide. But the veterans who
served with him know better, and in Unfit for Command, they tell their story, including:
* How all three of John Kerry's Purple Hearts were for minor injuries, easily treated with band-aids, not requiring a single hour of
hospitalization
* How captured Americans were tortured in North Vietnamese prisons for not endorsing John Kerry's false testimony-before the United States
Senate-about alleged American war crimes
* How John Kerry carried a typewriter and an 8-mm home movie camera with him to Vietnam so he could record his own exaggerated version of his war
exploits and film staged reenactments of his "combat actions" to advance his political career
* Why John Kerry's photograph hangs in a place of honor in the Vietnamese communist "War Remnants Museum" in Saigon
Want to know the real John Kerry? Read Unfit for Command-and prepare to be shocked.
From the Inside Flap
John Kerry, War Hero? Guess again.
John O'Neill was the naval officer who took over John Kerry's swift boat in the muddy waters of Vietnam. What he learned convinced him-and convinced
the majority of veterans who served directly with Kerry-that John Kerry was and is unfit for command at the lowliest rank in the Navy, let alone as
commander in chief of the United States.
In this stunning new book, John O'Neill and his coauthor Dr. Jerome Corsi (an expert on the anti-Vietnam War movement) have interviewed dozens of
veterans who served with Kerry and have meticulously documented a shameful record of betrayal and deception on the part of John Kerry.
In Unfit for Command you'll learn:
* How two of John Kerry's three Purple Heart decorations resulted from self-inflicted wounds, not suffered under enemy fire
* Why John Kerry's third Purple Heart "fanny wound" was the highlight of his much touted "no man left behind" Bronze Star
* How John Kerry turned the tragic death of a father and small child in a Vietnamese fishing boat into an act of "heroism" by filing a false report
on the incident.
* How John Kerry entered an abandoned Vietnamese village and slaughtered the domestic animals owned by the civilians and burned down their homes with
his Zippo lighter
* How John Kerry's reckless behavior convinced his colleagues that he had to go-becoming the only swift boat veteran to serve only four-months in
Vietnam
* How as a leader of Vietnam Veterans Against the War, John Kerry attended a meeting where plans were discussed to assassinate prominent United States
Senators who supported the war
* How Kerry met secretly with communist delegates at the Paris Peace Conference during the Vietnam War, and why some believe he violated the Uniform
Code of Military Justice and federal law
Based on detailed interviews with Swift Boat veterans who served in Vietnam with John Kerry and on recently released FBI surveillance reports of John
Kerry's anti-war activities, Unfit for Command is a shocking indictment of a politician who slandered his fellow veterans, danced on the edge of
treason, and has shamelessly exaggerated his own war service for political ends
About the Author
John O'Neill served in Coastal Division 11 in Vietnam and took command of PCF 94, John Kerry's swift boat, after Kerry's departure. Outraged by
Kerry's anti-war slanders against his fellow veterans, O'Neill faced Kerry in a famous debate on the Dick Cavett Show in 1971 refuting Kerry's
accusations of rampant American war crimes in Vietnam. A graduate of the Naval Academy, and from a Navy family, O'Neill is a lawyer in private
practice in Houston.
Jerome Corsi received his Ph.D. from Harvard University and is an expert on political violence and the anti-war movement in the United States. The
author of many articles and books, he lives in. 
Save us a post everytime Matt Drudge reads a new chapter, just read the whole book.
EDIT: Typo.
[edit on 9-8-2004 by curme]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 9-8-2004 @ 08:56 AM by thematrix
|
I think its funny how before all this election stuff started, alot of people were in concensus that both Kerry and Bush were unfit as decent
presidential candidates.
Now you got people defending bush and people defending kerry again.
Wake up and smell the roses people, they are both equaly bad and should never be put into the white house, not even as genators!!
The US election this year is a choice between the better of 2 evils. The US Presidential election system has failed utterly and totaly.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 9-8-2004 @ 08:56 AM by FlyersFan
|
Originally posted by FredT
What I find interesting is that the vilification of the swift boat sailors who dare come out against Kerry is begining 
Yes, it is interesting. Kerry has begun his shakedown of the veterans.
humaneventsonline.com.edgesuite.net...
www.conservativeunderground.com...
[edit on 8/9/2004 by FlyersFan]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 9-8-2004 @ 09:00 AM by FredT
|
Thats just amazing. Its an outright attempt at censorship and bullying by his and the DNC's attorneys. As our Governator famously said: Where there
is smoke, there is Fiahr........
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 9-8-2004 @ 09:02 AM by Affirmative Reaction
|
Originally posted by thematrix
The US Presidential election system has failed utterly and totaly. 
It has actually worked exactly as designed. Those that the people have voted for are running for office. He who gets the most votes, wins.
Just because someone, from another country that just happens to be a constitutional monarchy, doesn't happen to like the choices made by the people
of the country to be governed, doesn’t mean the system has failed. It is quite to the contrary....
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 9-8-2004 @ 09:03 AM by FlyersFan
|
Originally posted by FredT censorship and bullying 
Censorship + bullying + threat of law suit against free speech = SHAKEDOWN
[edit on 8/9/2004 by FlyersFan]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 9-8-2004 @ 09:07 AM by FlyersFan
|
Originally posted by thematrix
The US Presidential election system has failed utterly and totaly. 
Nope. It's working exactly as it should be.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 9-8-2004 @ 09:45 AM by sminkeypinkey
|
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 9-8-2004 @ 09:49 AM by sminkeypinkey
|
Originally posted by Affirmative Reaction
Those that the people have voted for are running for office. He who gets the most votes, wins. 
Yeah right, and Gore's 500 000 more votes than Bush got in 2000 are just a technicality, right?
Jeb's tactics, the dodgy voting machines and daddy's SC judges won it for Bush, not a majority of the public vote, and the whole world knows it.
George Bush a selected President not a duly elected President.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 9-8-2004 @ 09:50 AM by FredT
|
Now Sminkey, Kerry is the one touting his Great War record, not the otehr way around. Its actually kind of a reveral of sorts. If he is going to push
a particular area of his charecter he should have made sure that he cleared out the Skelitons in his closet. He pushed the issue not it may come back
to bite him on the ass.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 9-8-2004 @ 10:00 AM by FlyersFan
|
Originally posted by sminkeypinkey
Does he eat live first born too - 
I don't know. But he is very open about the hypocritical
fact that he attends a Catholic church, and says he's a
'good Catholic', when in fact he believes mothers should
be allowed to murder their pre-born children. I don't know
if he advocates eatting them too, but considering it's Kerry,
you never know what he'd approve of just to get a vote.
[edit on 8/9/2004 by FlyersFan]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 9-8-2004 @ 10:06 AM by FlyersFan
|
Oh ... I understand ... it's a painful thing to see the
truth about this guy. Buck up pilgrim. Having the
truth about Kerry come out isn't desperate ... it's
just ... the truth. Take a deep breath and try to
relax. There are still 2 1/2 months left until he goes
down in flames and there will be a whole lot more
truth about him coming out. When it's all done and
you see him for what he is, you may have feelings of
guilt or remorse for having supported him. If you
start de-toxing from him now, you may be able to
ease those feelings, or even be rid of them altogether.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 9-8-2004 @ 10:12 AM by curme
|
What is pre-born? Born before they are born? Is that anything like pre-boarding?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 9-8-2004 @ 10:30 AM by Mirthful Me
|
Satan? Naw, Satan would imply that there was unified, coherent plan... John Kerry flip flops too much to be worthy of a Satan comparison *pictures
John Kerry in Hell, "leading" minions*... "Today we take Paradise, unless anyone thinks that’s a bad idea... what do the polls say"?... "Everyone
wants ice water"?... "Hmmm, this is a toughie, invade Heaven, or get some bottled water"?... Think, think, think... (40 minutes later)... still
trying to think... *light bulb appears over head* "Eureka, I'll do just what Michael Moore would do..." *picks up phone* orders 300 supreme pizzas
and charges it to the "Hollywood Elite"...
Obviously this was all in jest, I mean who could picture John Kerry leading anything? After all, he is "Unfit For Command".
p.s. I haven’t been “deperate” since the National Wildlife Organization’s Primate Interbreeding Program started back in the Eighties.
p.p.s. Baby consumption is the purview of the Reptilian Freemason Overlords in "Secret Societies", please refer any remarks concerning this activity
to the kindly gents there.
Zoo Monkeys, not just for tossing “poo” anymore…
[edit on 9/8/2004 by Mirthful Me]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 9-8-2004 @ 10:33 AM by Affirmative Reaction
|
Originally posted by sminkeypinkey
Yeah right, and Gore's 500 000 more votes than Bush got in 2000 are just a technicality, right?
Jeb's tactics, the dodgy voting machines and daddy's SC judges won it for Bush, not a majority of the public vote, and the whole world knows it.
George Bush a selected President not a duly elected President. 
We were speaking of the CURRENT election, not the last. But since you brought it up, the actual results were Bush - 271, Gore - 266.
You say you are from "planet Earth", but it must not be here in the USA, because you obviously have no idea how the electoral system works in this
country, and that tired old line about the popular vote is just that. Tired. Whatever your feelings about the Electoral College are, it's the law of
the land, and Bush won. Gore was the one who called for the recount, but ONLY IN COUNTIES HE THOUGHT HE COULD SWING THE VOTE IN! The so called
"recount" was such a travesty, what with the Democrat controlled election commissions in those counties simply IGNORING the Republican and
independent observer’s objections when they pulled their shameless hanky panky with the "hanging chads", it's no wonder the Supreme Court followed
THE LAW and called it off.
And since you STILL have a sore spot for the "SORE - LOOSERMAN" ticket's defeat, remember that the independent post election recounts still showed
that Bush won.
Of course, even if Bush wins by a landslide, you apologists will be claiming fraud every time from now on. The lies of the left are now so shameless
they will never cease.
Get off it, get over it, its old news....
[edit on 9-8-2004 by Affirmative Reaction]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 9-8-2004 @ 10:39 AM by donguillermo
|
Originally posted by FlyersFan
www.drudgereport.com...
Kerry testified that he was on a super secret mission, illegally going
into Cambodia on Christmas during his four months in Vietnam. 
Please document that Kerry ever testified to this. I don't see anything in the Drudge article about Kerry testifying about this matter. I don't
recall anything in Kerry's Senate testimony about a secret mission to Cambodia. Can you please refresh my memory on this?
 The truth - he was no where near Cambodia. He was 50 miles
away, writing in his journal during the time he was supposed
to be on the super secret illegal spy mission into Cambodia. 
The truth is, we don't know what actually happened at this point. The Drudge article quotes John O'Neill as saying Kerry's statements are complete
lies. How would he know? He was never in Viet Nam at the same time as Kerry.
The Drudge article states that all of Kerry's commanders deny he was ever ordered to Cambodia. Well, duh! Have you ever heard of plausible
deniablity? If Kerry did indeed go on a secret mission to Cambodia, it would have been in direct violation of U.S. military orders of the Viet Nam
command. Notice Kerry's commanders say Kerry would have been disciplined or court-martialed if he had gone to Cambodia. If they admit to ordering
or having knowledge of such a secret mission, they would be guilty of court-martial offenses themselves.
Finally, we are told that three of Kerry's crew deny they were ever in Cambodia. Why aren't we presented with affidavits, or at least quotes, from
these crewmen? All we have is the word of John O'Neill, the lead author of the book, that these crewmen have made these denials.
At this point, the case that John Kerry lied about his secret mission to Cambodia is far from proven.
[edit on 8/9/2004 by donguillermo]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 9-8-2004 @ 10:51 AM by FlyersFan
|
Originally posted by donguillermo
At this point, the case that John Kerry lied about his secret mission to Cambodia is far from proven. 
John Kerry on his 'secret' mission to Cambodia - 'hmmm where will I set up my typewriter? On this rock, no .. on this one .. no I think this one
.. no, the first one ... no ... (forty minutes later), will some F'n #($*$&$#^ tell me which rock to set my typwriter on!'
He lied. He always lies. He lies and then forgets that he lied
and then lies some more. Then he flip flops his lies and lies
some more. Check the transcripts of the senate hearings.
I posted some info about three postings from here on the next page.
More is coming ....
[edit on 8/9/2004 by FlyersFan]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |