posted on Jun, 27 2011 @ 09:13 PM
Originally posted by userid1
I never made the statement as you implied in an earlier comment - the Washington Post did, and it would be hard for me to claim it's "my"
article with the Washington Post attribution embedded in it. I claimed it to be the external source posting I submitted to the thread as a counter to
the external source post you presented - nothing more. Do you not understand the difference or do you think I am the Washington Post?
Now your talking semantics.
But I suppose that is all you can practice after you dare me in front of all these people here
to show where you brought the term 'exclusion'
into this discussion.
Again....for EVERYONE to see, it's right here.
I understood perfectly and have been saying EXACTLY that from the start. YOU'RE the one that kept hanging on to the myth that the FBI never
provided DNA evidence from the flight #77 hijackers to Military Mortuary Affairs based on the external quote you provided - which we now (apparently)
both agree was a bogus claim.
OMG. Why do I have conversations with imbeciles? Since comprehension is not your forte, I will not ask nor assume that you are capable of going back
to first few I posts I made within this thread, and reread them. It wouldnt do any good....for that I feel bad for you.
Am I right in guessing that English is not your first language?
This coming from someone who makes a post and then denies he ever made it. Then when proven to him...well....I might as well speak Farcy. This
discussion will go just as far.