It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

To prove NASAs' biggest coverup - What did they find out on the moon?

page: 2
4
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 18 2011 @ 09:37 PM
link   
I doubt it highly enough to say no, it is not possible. There would have to be a reason, as well as a detailed explanation for something like this to even become worthy of looking in to. There would have to
be a mechanism that caused landmasses to duplicate on different bodies in space, and no part of cosmology even remotely suggests that what you are proposing could be true. You basically say that all things are possible, but that does not, logically, infer any type of truth to this idea. There is just too much evidence to the contrary, as well as zero supporting evidence. The similarity between the two pics is not great, and it is a simple case of matrixing, basically seeing something that isn't really there.




posted on Jun, 18 2011 @ 09:40 PM
link   
I'm astounding by such latitude in your thinking, and then there is the longitude also to consider.
Right?



posted on Jun, 18 2011 @ 10:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by JiggyPotamus
I doubt it highly enough to say no, it is not possible. There would have to be a reason, as well as a detailed explanation for something like this to even become worthy of looking in to. There would have to
be a mechanism that caused landmasses to duplicate on different bodies in space, and no part of cosmology even remotely suggests that what you are proposing could be true. You basically say that all things are possible, but that does not, logically, infer any type of truth to this idea. There is just too much evidence to the contrary, as well as zero supporting evidence. The similarity between the two pics is not great, and it is a simple case of matrixing, basically seeing something that isn't really there.



Well the all things are possible is my belief (not actuality) of a creator allowing all things to exist, a neutral perception. Although the intention was not necessarily metaphysics, but more inclined at possibility - even that of psychology with that.

Question perhaps, IF time travel and alternate realities were possible, and somehow LHC allowed that ability, to go as far past and future as possible, that JFK recognized that the first timeline where he was not killed created a reality of pure disaster, still alive, and able to go back in time and stopped Lee Harvey Oswald from yelling "Duck" taking the rifle and shooting himself - whilst de-materialising, would that be logical in a said world - or perhaps just a good movie plot.

Perhaps UKs' "Red Dwarf" instigates too much lateral thinking


Thanks everyone for the responses, much appreciated

edit on 11/6/18 by Im a Marty because: Added shooting oneself JFK - more accurate description of Red Dwarf First Episode Season 7



posted on Jun, 19 2011 @ 09:34 AM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 


You are pointing at two very different latitudes and longitudes on Earth and the Moon.

Really, Phage. Have you never heard of continental drift?

I think this theory makes perfect sense. The only question worth asking is, where did all that water go?

Who stole our water?

I think we should be told.



posted on Jun, 19 2011 @ 10:45 AM
link   

Originally posted by Astyanax
reply to post by Phage
 


You are pointing at two very different latitudes and longitudes on Earth and the Moon.

Really, Phage. Have you never heard of continental drift?

I think this theory makes perfect sense. The only question worth asking is, where did all that water go?

Who stole our water?

I think we should be told.


Actually that makes more sense than my theory - could our moon and earth actually be twin planets? Water was sucked off the moon, similar shaped 'continents', could they somehow physically be similar.




posted on Jun, 19 2011 @ 12:17 PM
link   
reply to post by AllUrChips
 


If we haven't been to the moon who put the mirror on it's surface that Astronomers can shine a laser at and record the moon's distance from earth by measuring how long it takes for it to bounce off and return?
edit on 19-6-2011 by TupacShakur because: To edit my post



posted on Jun, 19 2011 @ 12:30 PM
link   
I actually agree with your thinking... even though it may not be the truth... its still a good thought process... not very many people out here besides us here on ats can do that...
So thank you for giving me information I can ponder on and put away for future reference.. everyone has ideas and its good for all of us to take everyones Opinion in consideration... for us to be completely open...



posted on Jun, 19 2011 @ 01:04 PM
link   

Originally posted by Im a Marty

Originally posted by freedom12
reply to post by Im a Marty
 
I believe I have found some footage that may help answer your questions about the moon sir.






Hope that helps!!



Freedom12 - I was more inline to thinking of Apollo 18 (horror movie to be released)


Looking at the teaser for the Transformer movie I think it's absolutely clear that its referring to the rumoured Apollo 20 footage which has been discussed on here many times. The footage of Buss and Neil entering the craft through a breach in its hull looks exactly like some footage posted on youtube by "moonwalker 1966 delta, who left clues to his identity, and if true, would actually be John Young. Check it out. The similarity is astonishing...



posted on Jun, 19 2011 @ 01:28 PM
link   
I'm a newbie and don't yet know how to embed video so I've just provided the link. Hope I haven't caused any problems by doing this? Compare the youtube video from the 38 second mark on with the Transformers teaser... The similarity can't be accidental.
www.youtube.com...



posted on Jun, 19 2011 @ 02:15 PM
link   
We might ad this, its fake, and think it was also proven fake (not sure dough)

edit on 19-6-2011 by Grifter.be because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 19 2011 @ 04:54 PM
link   


Iron Sky - Nazis' went to the Dark Side of the Moon in 1945.

Thanks to JohnnyAnonymous for the heads up



posted on Jun, 28 2011 @ 04:28 PM
link   

Originally posted by Astyanax
reply to post by Phage
 


You are pointing at two very different latitudes and longitudes on Earth and the Moon.

Really, Phage. Have you never heard of continental drift?

I think this theory makes perfect sense. The only question worth asking is, where did all that water go?

Who stole our water?

I think we should be told.


How do you know the moon has continental drift? or continents at all?



posted on Jul, 19 2011 @ 01:27 PM
link   
reply to post by TupacShakur
 


The moon itself is a mirror - every time you see it glowing in the sky it is reflecting light from the sun.
But also we have been to the moon. If you want to talk about the government lying to us about stuff like that, this is the wrong section... (second sentence directed at someone different than the first).

OT: Sorry, I don't see too much similarity in the first two pictures, nor do I understand how life could hop from planet to planet/the moon could be the Earth in the past. Many scientists actually theorize that when the Earth was still young and forming (molten rock, etc) it was struck by a meteor which broke off a chunk of rock. That chunk of rock was caught by the gravity of Earth and is now known as our moon.

Rock samples from the moon exactly match the type of rocks found within the Earths crust. I suppose that could support your idea, depending on how you interpret that information.
edit on 19-7-2011 by Denali because: clarification



posted on Jul, 24 2011 @ 06:13 PM
link   
MARTY'S
QUOTE
"For example, the moon, relative in size, is not that big correct? So if we're trying to compare the Earth to the Moon, how much difference would there be in size if we remove all of Earths' water - leaving just the land? Would the earth be similar in size?"
UNQUOTE

MARTY,you must understand that all the Earth waters if we take average depth of 5000 mts and if we transfer that depth to 100 cm globe would not be even 0.5 mm.Therefor the Earth diameter would be reduced without water for mere 0.05 pct



posted on Jul, 24 2011 @ 06:15 PM
link   

Originally posted by Argyll

Originally posted by AllUrChips
reply to post by Im a Marty
 


no because the atmosphere would not support human life there. Plus we havent even been to the moon was all a lie.


Care to expand?


And expand you will without a pressure suit.



posted on Jul, 24 2011 @ 06:41 PM
link   
The Moon we know is Earth's satellite but there is something very strange with that satellite.So strange that it ought to be artificially placed there.
You may demand,why artificial.I shall not enter here in recent findings that it rings like a bell after the strike by explosive or that its craters are too shallow.
What is very strange is that its size and distance from Earth are correct to cover exactly all the Sun and Earth,s shade covers exactly all the Moon.Would the Moon be slightly bigger or smaller or slightly further or closer to the Earth nothing will correspond any more.Would it be that exactly that values are needed to have the life on the surface of our planet.



posted on Jul, 24 2011 @ 06:53 PM
link   
What is the reason we never went back to the moon?
The answer could well be that there is a superior civilization there which does not allow us.



posted on Jul, 24 2011 @ 08:02 PM
link   
good thought
thinking about it if mars is the next stage
mars appears destroyed...







 
4
<< 1   >>

log in

join