It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Should be just butt out of the rest of the world? Should we monitor Iraq and Afghanistan elections?
Originally posted by dgtempe
We invade countries- we kill and maime people- We have our noses in every country of the world and then when something like this happens you people go berzerk! IF Bush has nothing to hide, then it should be no problem.
This is not going to be a practice every 4 years. They are just going to check election process and since frankly the process DOES stink with the Bush administration, at least 62% of the population would be more at ease with their prescence.
***If Republicans have nothing to hide THIS election this should not be a problem at all***
SUPPOSE Bush did tell this group to come observe elections: This smells even worse- makes me think plans are NOT to have elections due to some "terrorist" (wink wink) attack, but invitation would serve as cover up.
Everything this administration does it does and who benefits? yup. The government benefits.
Originally posted by dgtempe
How can I argue with the supreme court? Republicans? Yes, I do think Bush pushed and forced his way into the presidency- so dont a lot of other people.
So dont single me out as crazy. The majority is with me on this.
Originally posted by drfunk
ofc he was elected legally, if it was illegal by law he wouldnt be there. But he is still morally illegitimate president because they exploited and cheated the system in a way that wasnt breaking the law, but was still morally incorrect for someone to do.
just because the ineffectiveness and corruption of your supreme court allowed him to have the presidency, thanks to his dad .
If they counted all the votes, Gore would of won. You cant deny that.
And he would of been much better than Bush.