This morning June 18, 2011 I read an article on WOWT channel 6 NBC, Omaha, NE regarding the status of the Fort Calhoun Nuclear Plant. The article was called "OPPD Says Fort Calhoun Rumors Untrue". In the article Bannister addressed the recent concerns about flooding in the plant and the FAA No Fly Zone over the plant.

His comments about the flooding were that everything was fine and would not be a true disaster unless flood waters rose three to five more feet. Then it would be a real disaster. In the comments section of the article, there are comments from someone regarding a non-emergency call made from the plant indicating that there was flooding in the plant already. There was also a comment from someone that access is being controlled into the plant with employees taking a bus in and out. No parking available due to flooding. I have listed the articles and the sites because I don't know how to post links to threads. I'm So Sorry! Wish I knew more about computers!

On KPTM another local Omaha television station, an article about the "Flooding of the Missouri River" indicates that the river is expected to rise three to 5 feet MORE by the end of June which is basically within the next two weeks. This spells Disaster To Me!!!

Regarding the FAA "No Fly Zone" above the plant, Bannister says he ordered it because he did not want a plane to crash into the plant. Sounds to me more like he didn't want anyone getting close enough to get good pictures of what is really going on. The actual NOTAM "FDC 1/6523" indicates that the airspace is restricted due to "hazards" / flood relief efforts. No problem?????????????

It appears that rather than block the issue, it's to cover up the issue now.

Keep an eye on flooding articles for the Omaha area as well as comments to these articles, on Nebraska local stations. Good stuff! I suppose the comments will get restricted next if people say too much.
If this has already been posted, I'm sorry, but I did not see anything on this topic of deception.
You might also want to read the thread "Obama Orders News Black Out" a thread under natural disasters, as well. Thanks for looking! Be safe!!

Given the panic this story could cause if people get loose with the facts (not suggesting anyone has yet) I think it's important to note two major distinctions between this and Fukushima:

1. The Generators at Fort Calhoun are not at or below grade the way they were in Japan. These generators cannot be taken out of the picture by the flooding everyone has so far predicted. There also isn't a massive wall of water bringing pure destruction to everything it touches in this case. The Generators won't be wiped away as if they never existed, as we saw in Japan.

2. Fort Calhoun was taken off-line and brought down for scheduled refueling in April. Due to the potential for just this type of event, it was decided before the flood waters became an immediate crisis, that it would not be brought back online until after the flood season/issues had passed. As it is, that was one of the best decisions they've ever likely made. Talk about timing and luck, given the problems they may face now.

As one final difference, and this is a HUGE one....Fort Calhoun's issues are very localized in nature. That is, should there be a problem, the rest of the outside world can descend upon the plant and handle matters before they can ever reach an uncontrolled meltdown situation like Japan is dealing with.

Of course, this isn't to make light of what is a legitimate and declared emergency situation at a Nuclear Power Plant. We just need to keep our heads and keep it in perspective, IMHO.

Sounds like they're gearing-up for some serious damage control in the PR department.

Who's that lady with the horses face that says radiation is good for us? Coulter? If we see her long face commenting about this one---> We know to loot the shelves and head for the nearest what> coal mine?

Ya' know, why can I not have access to a satellite that shows things as they happen?

I'll continue waiting for the veil of deceit to be lifted...

I want to know the truth. I have been searching & searching and I get conflicting reports. I want to read the bottomline truth on what is going on at Fort Calhoun. I live in a neighboring state and would like to know if I should be concerned.

Last night (Sunday) from 11 to 12 midnight massive HAARP RINGS in the midwest again. In 24-48 hours the following locations will be hammered with the epicenter of the storm and/or tornado that will pass through the area. Windsor Kansas, Canton and Beresford South Dakota, Aurora Nebraska, Westfield and Packwaukee Wisconsin, Goshen and New Market Ohio, and possibly Sandwich and Hinckley Illinois (also possibly the hardest hit). When I named two towns it looked like the center was between the two towns. When one town was named, the center looked to be near the town, but not necessarily centered exactly on the town. It's hard to be that precise in most cases. These HAARP RINGS were still there at 4 AM. Could mean really massive storms.


Area west of St Helens Washington also with HAARP RINGS.

Today (daylight hours) I saw very little to no activity, regarding HAARP. It appears that most action is done at night, probably due to more people becomming aware of the governments hidden agenda and weather war. They are not relenting at all. I saw this comming more than a month ago as I saw the massive HAARP RINGS over Montanna almost every day for weeks in May and first of June. Climate Change/Global Warming is an ABSOLUTE FRAUD.

Watch those towns that I listed and you will see for yourselves.


Right now 7:17 PM Pacific Time, there are strange weather radar readings over California, Oregon, Washington and Canada. It looks like Oregon and Washigton will be in for some wild weather tonight. Seeing some Haarp Rings over Washington and Canada (west coast), barely visable though at this moment. This will effect in 24-48 hours though. Some weird "RAYS" over the Portland area also.This weather system is anything but normal, as it heads north up the coastline, instead of east-southeast across the states. WEATHER MODIFICATION no doubt.