posted on Jun, 18 2011 @ 10:18 AM
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
reply to post by boondock-saint
it seems entirely unfair to continue to say that you have some intellectual superiority, and reference a thread that you authored which has been
404'd as your evidence.
Think you might be able to recreate the meat of your claims here, so that the information that the ATS censors have thrown out can be viewed?
On the contrary, you are 100% incorrect. The onus of proof of deletion and content, does not rest with the poster. Poster has mentioned the
owner/runner. Therefore, which one has the delete button??? Which one empowers the loss of text??? You are playing defense.
"Entirely unfair" to whom? The owners/runners of some domain? Fine, then play defense, but Boondock Saint doesn't have the delete button, so
throwing the burden of proof on him, is a defense tactic.
Only one party has access to the delete button where words and links are thrown into the abyss. FACT. They do not email the content back to you, so
that you can repost it, and that describes their indifference to the contributions/analysis of the posting community.
Therefore the ultimate solution is that Boondock Saint should probably have used notepad to save his content to throw back at apes. Because though he
doesn't have the delete button, he does have the ability to post his words anywhere on the IP gamespace where such words about hacking and
billion-dollar crimes, are allowed to be posted. Which is of course, only on sites that discuss chupacabra and Serpro type events as well. It's a