It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Is that really a fact? If we don't know those secret trinkets, how can we know that they are 50 years (and how do we measure 50 years in development? Does that mean that we are using cell phones from the 60s?) ahead of what we use?
Originally posted by NoRegretsEver
The little trinkets that are given to us is about 50 years behind. This should be a well know fact!
No, not Russia, the Soviet Union.
There was a very real threat between the US and other countries, especially Russia.
A photo or a document are a fact. If they represent the truth or not is a different matter, but they are facts.
No photo, No document, NO person, can truly give facts, only speculation. Whether it be Beter, or even me, or you.
I would only add to that, "always".
Keep an open mind.
We can't, but as we have photos of those areas, why not look at them?
Originally posted by newcovenant
We can't see secreted doors carved out of mountains on Earth that we know are there and part of military DUMB programs so how can we see a door covered with sand on the moon which might be all that appears of a base if there were one?
Google doesn't have any cameras taking photos of the Moon or Mars, the photos they have are publicly available.
Originally posted by newcovenant
Maybe the moon has visitors who are very transient and they stick a piece of gum on the google earth cameras?
No, but I think nothing will ever be good enough, we will always have that (natural) doubt of someone that wasn't there.
Originally posted by Exuberant1
I don't think that is good enough.
Originally posted by ArMaP
Google doesn't have any cameras taking photos of the Moon or Mars, the photos they have are publicly available.
Originally posted by newcovenant
Maybe the moon has visitors who are very transient and they stick a piece of gum on the google earth cameras?
In fact, there are many publicly available photos that Google doesn't use, it looks like they getting slower and slower at updating their photos database.
Originally posted by Kandinsky
When someone makes claims that are so far beyond 'extraordinary' that they've gone into the realm of bad fiction, only a 'moron' would take them seriously. To continue to take Beter's words on faith is to accept that in the 70s, the world was run by robot presidents, that all UFOs are Bolshevik particle-beam ships and that it's easier to shoot particle beams from 250 000 miles away rather than from 60 000 ft above the Earth!?
Originally posted by Pimander FIRST TWO SENTENCES OF OP
I was just alerted to the existence of a conspiracy "theorist", called Peter Beter, by this OP by NoRegretsEver.. I can't say i have read his work but on one site he is claiming there are/were at least 10 Russian bases on the moon.
Originally posted by ArMaP
Is that really a fact? If we don't know those secret trinkets, how can we know that they are 50 years (and how do we measure 50 years in development? Does that mean that we are using cell phones from the 60s?) ahead of what we use?
Originally posted by NoRegretsEver
The little trinkets that are given to us is about 50 years behind. This should be a well know fact!
No, not Russia, the Soviet Union.
There was a very real threat between the US and other countries, especially Russia.
A photo or a document are a fact. If they represent the truth or not is a different matter, but they are facts.
No photo, No document, NO person, can truly give facts, only speculation. Whether it be Beter, or even me, or you.
I would only add to that, "always".
Keep an open mind.
Is that really a fact? If we don't know those secret trinkets, how can we know that they are 50 years (and how do we measure 50 years in development? Does that mean that we are using cell phones from the 60s?) ahead of what we use?
The little trinkets that are given to us is about 50 years behind. This should be a well know fact!
Armonk, NY - 03 Feb 2009: The Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration has selected Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory as the development site for two new supercomputers--Sequoia and Dawn—and IBM as the computer’s designer and builder. These systems will allow for smarter simulation and negate the need for real-world weapon testing.
Under terms of the contract, Sequoia will be based on future IBM BlueGene technology, exceed 20 petaflops (quadrillion floating operations per second) and will be delivered in 2011 with operational deployment in 2012. Dawn, an initial delivery system to lay the applications foundation for multi-petaflop computing, will be based on BlueGene/P technology, reach speeds of 500 teraflops (trillion floating operations per second) and is scheduled for operational deployment in early 2009.
Sequoia will represent a significant leap forward in compute power. With top speeds of 20 petflops Sequoia will be approximately 15 times faster than today’s most powerful supercomputer and offers more processing power than the entire list of Top500 supercomputers running today.
Sequoia will primarily be used to ensure the safety and reliability of the nation’s nuclear weapons stockpile. It will also be used for research into astronomy, energy, human genome science and climate change.
A photo or a document are a fact. If they represent the truth or not is a different matter, but they are facts.
No photo, No document, NO person, can truly give facts, only speculation. Whether it be Beter, or even me, or you.
I would only add to that, "always".
Keep an open mind.
Originally posted by ArMaP
A photo or a document are a fact. If they represent the truth or not is a different matter, but they are facts.
That technology is not 50 years in advance of what we use in our homes, it's just a slight evolution of what we have in our homes, done in large scale.
Originally posted by NoRegretsEver
Are you serious? Just in case your not, I meant that the tech that "they" have and what we have they are about 50 years in advance.
For example the Sequoia.
Source
Sequoia will be of Blue Gene/Q design, building off previous Blue Gene designs. It will consist of 98,304 compute nodes comprising 1.6 million processor cores and 1.6 PB memory in 96 racks covering an area of about 3,000 square feet (280 m2). The processors are to be 16- or 8-core Power Architecture processors built on a 45 nm fabrication process.
Yes, even if it's fake, as it exists and can be see and/or read by other people, it's a fact.
Documents can be made by anyone (cooltext.com...) with this link and a Kinko's account I can make almost any "valid" document.
If I make it... does that not make it fact?
Originally posted by Kandinsky
The ISS is out there as a cutting edge technology.
Originally posted by ArMaP
reply to post by Pimander
See above.
The document is always a fact, although it may not represent a fact.
A piece of paper is different from what is written on it, and a faked document may be used latter as a proof that there was someone faking it.
That technology is not 50 years in advance of what we use in our homes, it's just a slight evolution of what we have in our homes, done in large scale.
Sequoia will be of Blue Gene/Q design, building off previous Blue Gene designs. It will consist of 98,304 compute nodes comprising 1.6 million processor cores and 1.6 PB memory in 96 racks covering an area of about 3,000 square feet (280 m2). The processors are to be 16- or 8-core Power Architecture processors built on a 45 nm fabrication process.
Originally posted by ArMaP
If I fake a photo and post it on ATS (as I once did, to ask if anyone could see what was faked), that faked photo exists, and you can make copies of it, because it's existence is a fact, so the photo is also a fact.
Yes.
Originally posted by NoRegretsEver
So what your saying is, I have a piece of paper... FACT...
It may be, it may not be, but the piece of paper still exists, with or without it's content being true or not. The Lord of the Rings, for example, is a fact, it exists, but the story is not (as far as I know).
Whats on it?... LIES....
That I don't understand.
And if someone really wanted to get technical about a document, it can also NOT be there.
No, the 1000 documents still exist, obviously, it has nothing to do with people believing in them or not.
You can have 1,000 documents and if not one person believes or puts value on it, it doesn't exist, and has no meaning, except that you wasted paper.
Although I do not have any of those, anyone that owns a PlayStation 3, a Xbox 360 or a Wii has in his/her home a processor that uses the same technology (Power Architecture) used by IBM to build Sequoia.
Then either you live on a satellite, or close to the moon and are not telling, there are people out there that can only get dial up, WHO'S home are you talking about?
Originally posted by zorgon
Of what use is finding the Truth... if no one will believe you?
Originally posted by Exuberant1
Cha-ching. Good old Military Industrial Complex - it's a growth area.
Originally posted by zorgon
Maybe I should cash in my meteorites
Originally posted by Kandinsky
You've hurt my feelings and insulted the ISS crew.
Shame on you.
"The Lego Company, being active in the non space area, in co-operation with Intospace, a space industry service provider, developed a space education project aimed at developing, launching and operating a Lego Robot on the Space Station. This series is a highly sophisticated assembly set with programmable microchips and advanced reaction systems such as light-, touch or rotational sensors. The space environment of the ISS was perceived as the right scenario for this hi-tech project."