It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by earthdude
One could say that he was charged with child abuse. No money goes to the kids, they don't get to eat. Calling him just a debtor is wrong. He protested getting punished for being a child abuser. This is wrong. Suicide is the main wrong, especially when other suffer from your suicide, like his kids.
* 63% of youth suicides are from fatherless homes
Originally posted by daddio
reply to post by civilchallenger
IF people would just wake the hell up!!!!!!!
You CAN NOT pay a public debt, believe it or not it is illegal to pay a public debt per HJR-192 of June 5th 1933.
loveforlife.com.au...
The Promissory Note To Pay Our Debts
HJR-192 of June 5, 1933 is the promissory note (the promise of Abraham) the
government issued to balance the exchange to credit the people. The Promissory note is on
the debit side of the United States Governments ledger, which was a debited from their
credit, created by the Executive Order of April 5, 1933 when they took the gold out of
circulation. Public Policy is rooted in HJR-192 and is Grace that creates our exemption.
This is your temporal saving grace. Under grace, the law falls away to create a more perfect
contract. Public Policy removed the people's liability to make all payments by making a
contract null if it required the payment to be in substance, because the people didn't have
any money to pay with. All that must be done now is to discharge the liability. Pay and
discharge are similar words but the principles are as different as Old and New Testaments.
The word "pay" is equated with gold and silver, or something of substance like a first-born
lamb, which requires tangible work to be invested in it to remove the liability because an
execution must occur. The word "Discharge" is equated with paper, or even more basic,
simple credits and debits, that exist on paper only, like the slate held by the agents/angels
of heaven that get swiped clean. You cannot pay a bill with a bill and you cannot pay a debt
with a debt. What HJR-192 did was, remove the liability of an obligor (someone obligated to
pay a debt) by making it against Public Policy to pay debts. All that needs to be done now is
discharge the debit with an appropriate credit "dollar for dollar." Debt must be discharged
dollar for dollar in the same sense, as sin was discharged on the Cross. The moment a debt
exists, it must be written off. The catch is, we can't write off the debt because we are not in
possession of the account in deficit; our fiduciary agent is in possession of the account so
we must provide him with the tax return (by the return of the original offer) so the fiduciary
can discharge the liability through their internal revenue service (the bookkeeper). Most feel
that when the money was taken out of society, the people became the slaves, this is not
true, the people were freed from every obligation that society could create thus freeing the
people from any obligation which they may incur simply because we cannot pay a debt. Ask
yourself the question, What are you charging me with? And how do you expect Me to pay?
Simply said, there is no money, plain and simple for me to make the payment with and on
top of that, if I were to pay, who is paying Me to pay that guy and who's paying that guy and
so on... Public Policy is the supercedious bond because it limits our liability to pay. It is the
more perfect contract because it operates on grace to pay our debts after we have done all
that we can. We go as far as we can to fulfill the obligation (acceptance and tax return) and
after we have done all we can, mercy and grace kick in being our exemption to make the
payment. Grace creates our exemption in the industrial society so long as we accept the
charge.
This IS the accepted for value and return for discharge that ALL "Americans" should be using, This REMOVES the power FROM the government and returns it to the people where it belongs, but most people are too busy stuffing their faces with fast food, gambling or sitting on a chair or on the couch watch balls sports instead of paying attention to WHO runs the show.
Is it too much to ask people to pay goddamn attention?edit on 19-6-2011 by daddio because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by sonnny1
Question, Do you think FATHERS cant raise children? Seems the courts agree with that premise,as MOTHERS get the majority of PRIMARY PLACEMENT.edit on 19-6-2011 by sonnny1 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Forevever
Originally posted by sonnny1
Question, Do you think FATHERS cant raise children? Seems the courts agree with that premise,as MOTHERS get the majority of PRIMARY PLACEMENT.edit on 19-6-2011 by sonnny1 because: (no reason given)
see above I was impatient
I do NOT think Fathers can't raise children. On the contrary, my scenario above goes both ways.
When the ex was here, I always said he was a better mother than I was
he was a neat freak - chronic cleaning, doing laundry, cooking... he was crazy like that (a good kinda way)
He made his choice, I respect it - even if I do think it was an idiot choice - his loss.
Originally posted by TheImmaculateD1
reply to post by civilchallenger
The reason why males are banned from Battered Women's Shelters is so that the person who beat her to a pulp day in and day out cannot harras or stalk them there, also to prevent someone from turning up dead. They are a safe haven for women who feel like that they have no way out.edit on 19-6-2011 by TheImmaculateD1 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Forevever
I am absolutely positive this man was mentally ill - it was an ongoing longterm illness that would have culminated in his suicide no matter what pushed him over the edge, and ended up being mentioned in his suicide note.
That being said, I'm real glad he decided to leave such a detailed note. I don't think he was whining. And so what if he was - When someone decides to die, they either don't leave a note at all (and thats pretty rare), or they want to use their death to make a statement. Whining or not, he managed to get us talking, so wtg dude. This is obviously something he felt very strongly about, whether we agree or not, we're paying attention.
I also have strong feelings but they all come down to taking responsibility. I don't expect that everyone can, but those who are able should. Just for example, a lot of the details could have been prevented just by using a contraceptive
SOME people should stop having kids as a way to permanently attach themselves to other people.
If you want a child, before you go having one, you should be emotionally and financially ready to support that child ALONE. Anything you get on top of that (stable relationship, family and friends support, free grandma babysitter) should be a bonus - not an entitlement.
I am absolutely positive this man was mentally ill
Originally posted by sonnny1
No man or women for that matter should be held responsible for child support. Its "common sense" to be able to pay for your children's upbringing. Ive said this before,Everyone has made mistakes.
Originally posted by earthdude
Originally posted by sonnny1
No man or women for that matter should be held responsible for child support. Its "common sense" to be able to pay for your children's upbringing. Ive said this before,Everyone has made mistakes.
So abandoning a child is acceptable? I guess you mean if it does not die in a dumpster or is given to another. You make babies, the law says you gotta feed them or go to jail. I am OK with that law. You can't say that not providing for your offspring should not have any legal consequences.
The (Feminists) Impact on our Children....
The Impact on our Children
Inter-spousal violence perpetrated by men is only a small aspect of family violence. False abuse allegations are only a small tile in the mosaic of vilifying the men in our society. They serve well in successful attempts to remove fathers from the lives of our children. Here are some statistics resulting from that which show more of the whole picture.
79.6% of custodial mothers receive a support award
29.9% of custodial fathers receive a support award.
46.9% of non-custodial mothers totally default on support.
26.9% of non-custodial fathers totally default on support.
20.0% of non-custodial mothers pay support at some level
61.0% of non-custodial fathers pay support at some level
66.2% of single custodial mothers work less than full time.
10.2% of single custodial fathers work less than full time.
7.0% of single custodial mothers work more than 44 hours weekly.
24.5% of single custodial fathers work more that 44 hours weekly.
46.2% of single custodial mothers receive public assistance.
20.8% of single custodial fathers receive public assistance.
[Technical Analysis Paper No. 42 - U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services - Office of Income Security Policy]
40% of mothers reported that they had interfered with the fathers visitation to punish their ex-spouse.
["Frequency of Visitation" by Sanford Braver, American Journal of Orthopsychiatry]
50% of mothers see no value in the fathers continued contact with his children.
["Surviving the Breakup" by Joan Berlin Kelly]
90.2% of fathers with joint custody pay the support due.
79.1% of fathers with visitation privileges pay the support due.
44.5% of fathers with no visitation pay the support due.
37.9% of fathers are denied any visitation.
66% of all support not paid by non-custodial fathers is due to the inability to pay.
[1988 Census "Child Support and Alimony: 1989 Series" P-60, No. 173 p.6-7, and "U.S. General Accounting Office Report" GAO/HRD-92-39FS January 1992]
63% of youth suicides are from fatherless homes.
[U. S. D.H.H.S. Bureau of the Census]
90% of all homeless and runaway children are from fatherless homes.
85% of all children that exhibit behavioral disorders come from fatherless homes.
[Center for Disease Control]
80% of rapists motivated with displaced anger come from fatherless homes.
[Criminal Justice and Behavior, Vol. 14 p. 403-26]
71% of all high school dropouts come from fatherless homes.
[National Principals Association Report on the State of High Schools]
70% of juveniles in state operated institutions come from fatherless homes
[U.S. Dept. of Justice, Special Report, Sept., 1988]
85% of all youths sitting in prisons grew up in a fatherless home.
[Fulton County Georgia Jail Populations and Texas Dept. of Corrections, 1992]
Nearly 2 of every 5 children in America do not live with their fathers.
[US News and World Report, February 27, 1995, p.39]
There are:
11,268,000 total custodial mothers
2,907,000 total custodial fathers
[Current Populations Reports, US Bureau of the Census, Series P-20, No. 458, 1991]
What does this mean? Children from fatherless homes are:
4.6 times more likely to commit suicide,
6.6 times to become teenaged mothers (if they are girls, of course),
24.3 times more likely to run away,
15.3 times more likely to have behavioral disorders,
6.3 times more likely to be in a state-operated institutions,
10.8 times more likely to commit rape,
6.6 times more likely to drop out of school,
15.3 times more likely to end up in prison while a teenager.
(The calculation of the relative risks shown in the preceding list is based on 27% of children being in the care of single mothers.)
and — compared to children who are in the care of two biological, married parents — children who are in the care of single mothers are:
33 times more likely to be seriously abused (so that they will require medical attention), and
73 times more likely to be killed.
Originally posted by sonnny1
reply to post by Frira
What a horrible situation you have been put in by the Gender-Biased Judicial system. To play within the rules,only to be shattered at EVERY step. I feel for you,brother. Have you considered a fathers advocacy group? Like minded individuals,going through the same thing. I was there at one time. Not anymore. There is a light at the end of the tunnel. I implore you! Just keep fighting! They cant take your dignity away..........................
A person I suspect was an Angel came to me in a visit, asking, "You believe you are cursed?" We talk about that.
He said, "Your children do not believe you love them, because they do not see all the suffering you have done for them-- they do not know how your heart is agony."
I said, "Yes."
"Your love is real, whether they know it or not."
"Yes."
"You have a Father in Heaven who loves you whether you see it or not-- Who agonizes as He sees what you endure."
"Yes."
"Then you know that your love, unseen, has very real power."
Originally posted by Phenomium
I am absolutely positive this man was driven mentally ill, by his ex-wife....most men are driven crazy and into the poor-house by their wives, who almost always end up ex-wives [wonder why? Free money? Nah, couldn't be that.]