It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by BigJoninTexas
Stupid people feeling entitled, that's the US.
Originally posted by BigJoninTexas
I live in Texas and I think this is a good thing. The federal gov't. and state gov't have no business funding education. It is the responsibility of the parents. I went over my property taxes a few weeks ago and found that I paid over three thousand dollars to my local school district. I also send my son to private school which costs about five thousand a year, so basically I'm paying three thousand a year to send someone elses child to school. This is ridiculous. Every person needs to man up and take care of their own responsibilities. The system is broke. I'm thirty so assuming I stay in my house for the next 40 years and taxes won't go up (yeah right) that means I will pay 120,000 dollars to support other peoples' kids. Every parent should be taxed for their kids, not just the property owners that busted their butts in order to become successful. Stupid people feeling entitled, that's the US.
Originally posted by dolphinfan
reply to post by LexiconRiot
The fools are the folks who think that there is such a thing as "education" in the public sector to begin with. Today, education has little to do with instruction. Education is a social engineering labratory where all manner of social ills are sought to be corrected.
Free meals, social engineering instruction such as minority and gay studies, money for programs like student support groups and the rest of the rubbish that is done within the confines of "education".
Most of what happens within the context of "education" has absolutely nothing to do with teaching kids the things they need to learn to be successful upon graduating.
There is absolutely no way that presented with a $4bn cut and given the goal of providing students with the proper level of instruction in the priorities of English, math, history, science and civics that the school system would not be able to do that, no way.
Every day in the private sector executives are brought in and told to cut resources and guess what they do? They figure out what their critical functions are, how to do those as cheaply as possible at an acceptable level of quality and then priority rank the other stuff and, yes, some of that stuff gets cut.
This notion that has been fueled by the media, unions and political class that the monolithic beast of education provides a suite of functions that are both all necessary and all of equal priority is absolutely nonsense and defies logic.
Private firms don't run that way, private schools don't run that way, many government agencies don't run that way, families don't run that way, but somehow it is anti-social and harmful to our nation- our very democracy to consider that the poorly performing education establishent has to run that way,
It is illogical, foolish and does not serve the clients of the public education system - the tax payers.
If anything, cutting a massive amount of money from education would force the establishment to take a hard look at themselves, pair out the non-critical functions and would likely improve instruction.
Ideally cutting the funds would expose who the competent executives and leaders are within the system and weed out the poor ones.edit on 18-6-2011 by dolphinfan because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by sdcigarpig
reply to post by TheWalkingFox
Unlike the general public, and some here on ATS, I have worked for a school district and got to see first hand the inner works of how a school is ran.
It was appaling at best, horrifying would be the word.
Children failing to be controled,
teachers who thought that the sun rose and set on them,
and a school board that tried to get what they want, when they wanted things without considering the costs of such. Oh yeah that is a wonderful place to be. Mention budget cuts, and you get a good view of what congress looks like during the base closure debates, as every teacher did not want to see their department cut at all.
And during my time, this is what I learned about the public school system, they could never come in under costs. That is right, if they had an operating budget of say 300K, they would have to operate as if they had a budget of 500K, and care to guess why? If they put in a budget of 300K, and operated and came in under budget, the city, county, state and federal government would punish the school, and the district, by giving them less money. So if their budget was 300K, and they submitted the expense report stating they only spend 240K, then the next year they would get only 200K to run the school.
And that is not all, not only would they loose funding, but at the same time, they could lose their accrediation.
It is not about the equipment, it is the quality of teachers, which by the way, in New York, are almost impossible to fire. In New York City alone, they have teachers sitting around doing NOTHING, and getting paid for it, that is right the unions prevent a teacher from getting terminated. A teacher gets accused, but not convicted, of any crime and they pretty much get paid to do nothing. So how is that helping the problem.
And if there is a teacher whose class is not perfoming, but is at average standards, well they have a guaranteed job. The only way that those running a school have any options to get results is to fire the lot, if the school fails to make the grade, and that is the poorest schools.
Originally posted by sdcigarpig
4) Yes it is the schools job to educate, and as far as I can see, all that is required is a blackboard, chalk, paper, books and a teacher. That is it. Let the parents fund for a new computer, if they want their child to have a computer, not the school districts. It is really sad when the basics are ignored in favor of what is new. Pretty sad when a school district has to cut, say busses, cause they wanted to ensure that every student has a laptop.
Originally posted by Vitchilo
As many say, more money ain't the solution. But this bill still ain't fixing anything.edit on 17-6-2011 by Vitchilo because: (no reason given)