Originally posted by SocietysKillSwitch
Ok guys I will start by saying personally I support anon BUT in this instance im for the first time a bit wary of them. The reason is that they have pretty much setup a web-site in which they say you register for and be part of forums to help out and such. Well this is a double edged sword irdear........ They could be setting up possibly revealing every IP address that visited the site and possible future resistance members, to any government agency that either A) Raids and steals the info... B) Hacks the info.... C) Moles the info out (AKA a rat).

Im for securing the future and I think compromising the people in this world that have the balls to really stand up and fight is a bad idea. Also before I head out I would like to point out that im very aware how "good" they are at what they do networking wise but as the old saying goes.... Theres always going to be someone whos better.....

Im just waiting and seeing where this goes before my piece becomes part of the board.

You do have a good point, why would anonymous want us to register, when they stay anonymous. I myself am an Oath Keeper, and have no intentions on hiding my alliance, or my beliefs, ever. You all can stand by me in the revolution, I sure won't be anonymous, I'm almost positive, I'm already flagged anyways, so lets get this fight on!!!!!!!!!!!!

Remeber all it takes is one person. If you stand up against something others will follow.

I agree with everything that Anonymous is saying but im starting to get slightly suspicious of their intentions. I am now finding myself thinking is Anonymous a false flag operation ?

Their demands are far to unrealistic, there is no way they are going to overthrow the rich elite through repeated attacks over the Internet. As far as i can see the end result of their actions will be a complete lockdown of the Internet and an end to the free flow of information. This is exactly what the rich elite have been wanting for years. Up until now the government have not been able to lock down the net because everything that goes on is down to individual users but this could all change if an organized group started making serious trouble for everyone. Im saying "lock down" and "not shut down" theres no way the powers that be could turn off the Net without the whole world going crazy but they could be forced into seriously regulating what people do and how they do it.

With "Anonymous" making serious waves then anyone who seeks to be anonymous on the web will be instantly demonized. It is a classic false flag technique that has been used for 1000's of years dating right to back to Roman times when Nero demonized the Christians . The clever thing about sophisticated false flag operations is that most of the people taking part in them don't understand the true motives behind the groups actions.

Think about it , you were the government and wanted to shut down the free flow of info on the net how would you do it?

- Start up a group of hackers.
- Give the group a name so that everyone associated with it would be demonized by membership alone.
- Make that group famous.
- Start with low level attacks that make the group popular to gain support and membership so that 99.9 % of the people who are a part of it realy think they are working for the good of the people.
- Publicize future attacks so the world knows who to blame when they happen.
- Start to scale up the attacks to the point where the government HAS to do something about it once and forall.

As far as i can see this is standard false flag procedure. I dont want to stop them but i am worried we are all being very short sighted here. History has a lot of valuable lessons to teach us , we all have to understand the logical conclusions of these actions. I really hope i am totaly wrong but as intelligent people these are questions we need to be asking.

HHHmmmmmm

There is saying " never try and blagg a blagga "

and this is exactly what this is trying to do......
Come and join our group?..... yeah right.

let me just try and have a glimpse at a possible outcome .....

I join....
My I.P. is then flagged ( even more than it prob is already ) ( i love the piratebay!! )
When or if a cyber attack occurs again then said flagged I.P.'s are located and little men with blue lights and nice hats knock on my door.....
The group is portrayed in the media as a nasty terrorist group who is costing Jo Bloggs X amount of money in cyber security
For the safety of Jo Bloggs money and security of nations and banks the interweb is restricted
All freedom of speech which we have open to us now is extremly limited as web sites will have to pay for this extra security
Websites shutdown and people can not access valuable information and a more rounded view of current events

the revolution dies and people will eat the news the msm gives them..... because there is no other voice......
People then go back to buying the value deal at mcdonalds and watching X-factor on ice.....

thanks..... but no thanks.

This may be a bit far fetched?
but if it is possible?..................

Then i think it best to take a pass.....

don't try and blagg a blagga r kid......

If they'd just stayed " Anonymous " ......... then my spidey sense wouldn't be tingling .....

what next?

A subscription fee??....lol

As an ancestor of mine said (William Wallace) You may take my life, but you'll never take my FREEEEDDDOOOMMM!!!!!

Don't think our government has'nt been monitoring the MiddleEast uprisings and how the communications went through the internet to talk to each other.

They probably have a whole wing at the pentagon dissecting options and protocols.

The U.S. legal Department already knows what verbage must be used to justify a "shutdown."

Terrorists ,Act Of War... You know...THOSE kind of words.

Oh..They're already starting... hmmmmmm......

Is this the beginning of the end of free speech...AND? We can blame Anonymous and Wikileaks?

How convienient....... Same Bu**shi* another angle to take away rights...

Originally posted by Sri Oracle
Well that would make a dual declaration from both parties... TPTB just stated, under the US, inc. pseudonym, that cyber attacks are an act of WAR.

Well, the government would call eating cherry pie an act of war if it got in the way of their plans.

Gutless cowards take a stand, somewhere .....if not there then here do something besides talk.

As I read the entire thread I came up with 2 thoughts

1. The best place to hide is in plain sight.
2. If I wanted to get the sheeples attention, I'd find a way to shut down their internet.

In trying to do my part, I've shared a lot of the invaluable information obtained through ATS (and other places) and attempted to put it into undeniable form (cause most people I know, will only believe it if it comes from CNN or Fox or Wiki...)

But I can't force people to read it or pay attention.

If people losing their "freedom" online, makes them wake up and go "WTF!!"
Mission accomplished.