It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Antiquated1
Originally posted by fooks
she was asked/invited whatever for VP it wasn't her idea.
What does it matter whos idea it was? I never said it was anyone's idea. I just referred to her as having been up for the job in 2008, which she was.
do you understand the role of the VP?
Yes but that does not matter. She is not VP. She was in the running for it in 2008 when the emails that this thread is about were requested. You are trying too hard to find something to argue about that is not here.
POTUS don't kill me because this idiot will be POTUS.
lol!
your people were really freaked out, right?
I do not even know what you are saying.
Originally posted by Stormdancer777
May times members on this forum wonder which posters are plants or paid disinfo agents, I really can't think of another quite so obvious since I have been here, at least try and pretend once and a while.
It has been painfully obvious since I read your first few post.
Originally posted by centurion1211
Finally, my years on ATS have repeatedly shown me that when someone resorts to insults and deflections, it is almost always a signal that they have nothing left to debate with. Intellectually they are done.
Originally posted by fooks
i'm not the one who gives a rats.
you people deal with her.
i don't have a prob.
and you will loose.
if not for her,
the left would wither and die on the vine.
you should thank your lucky stars she is in your life.
i would of said god but ya'll might have misinterppertaed it.
Originally posted by Stormdancer777
reply to post by fooks
post removed by staff
Originally posted by Antiquated1
C
Now if either of you ever decided to discuss the topic of this thread, be sure and use that number.Jon Stewart slams media for Palin email coverage
Just a friendly reminder since the last and only person to mention the topic in a while has been me.
Originally posted by neo96
lamestream media indeed anticipation of non important stuff.
anything to paint the gop in a negative light and deflect from weiner and obama.
"when we dont have any news fit to print we make our own"
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
I missed this show so I'll have to watch it now.
I remember when the emails first surfaced and people were poring over them, looking for some dirt and they came up with.... VERY little if anything at all. I mentioned to my husband that that this is the strategy of the left this year (in preparation for the election): Slam each and every Republican candidate with everything we've got! Not that it's any different than the strategy employed by either party any particular year, but this one is really important and the rhetoric is going to steadily crank up until Nov 2012.
There was nothing in the Palin emails. They tried to find something but it wasn't there. It doesn't mean Sarah is a saint or good for politics, but they didn't find what they were looking for.
Birthers didn't find what they were looking for, either. I wonder if there's a crazy movement to declare the Palin emails as "fake"...
.edit on 6/15/2011 by Benevolent Heretic because: (no reason given)
Lawyers went through every page to redact sensitive government information, and 2,275 pages were withheld for reasons including attorney-client, work product or executive privilege; an additional 140 pages were deemed to be “non-records,” or unrelated to state business.
www.thestar.com...
Originally posted by centurion1211
Just when I thought an election couldn't be any more contentious than 2008, looks like 2012 will be worse. I'm really afraid that the net result of all this will be to drive more an more people from the election process. Could doing that actually be part of the plan?
And I'm glad you also got the point I was making earlier about the people participating in the "PMail feeding frenzy" basically using the same thought processes as the birthers. So, what is next, people screaming to see the REAL emails ad nauseum?
Originally posted by centurion1211
The real truth is that it is a "fact" to you simply because that's what you want to believe. And no doubt you want to believe your version because it ends up being much simpler than having to deal with how you could have been duped so badly into supporting a fraud.
Originally posted by masqua
I guess the redacted Pmails are an unimportant aspect:
Lawyers went through every page to redact sensitive government information, and 2,275 pages were withheld for reasons including attorney-client, work product or executive privilege; an additional 140 pages were deemed to be “non-records,” or unrelated to state business.
www.thestar.com...
Jon Stewart is a comedian who is just a tad biased. Big Whoop on that one.