It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by sheepslayer247
reply to post by backinblack
Believe me, if this was a rant the mods would have moves it rather quickly.
to promote liberal democracy in other countries.
Originally posted by jibeho
Actually, as a conservative I feel just the opposite shift in ATS over the course of the past several months. ATS seems like a new home for wayward Occupiers looking for meaning and purpose as they echo the daily talking points.
Much different now than when I joined 3 years ago and I would expect another shift as the 2012 election begins to heat up.
I'll still be here though...
I never made that statement.... At all. I hope you will put it into its proper context.
to promote liberal democracy in other countries.
but doing it under cover of groups like Anon, ACORN, SEIU, and other unions and assorted nefarious organizations, mostly supported by George Soros.
If I had to guess, I'd guess you were, are, or are considering going into politics.
Or a 13 year old who can't find a date on a Friday night, but I welcome your viewpoint anyway.
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by Misoir
I just cannot get on board with people who want to fundamentally transform our Republic into a direct democracy socialist State.
Originally posted by LadyGreenEyes
So....the plain is foiled! Must radio the mothership, right away...
Seriously, are opposing ideas THAT big of a threat? Where would anyone get the idea that one can't oppose certain things unless they are a liberal? Utter nonsense. Conservatives are SMALL government, less corruption. I think you are confused about what the right stands for.
In this theory, which has been proven counter-effective in most modern practice, management assumes employees are inherently lazy and will avoid work if they can and that they inherently dislike work. As a result of this, management believes that workers need to be closely supervised and comprehensive systems of controls developed. A hierarchical structure is needed with narrow span of control at each and every level. According to this theory, employees will show little ambition without an enticing incentive program and will avoid responsibility whenever they can. According to Michael J. Papa, if the organizational goals are to be met, theory X managers rely heavily on threat and coercion to gain their employee's compliance. Beliefs of this theory lead to mistrust, highly restrictive supervision, and a punitive atmosphere. The Theory X manager tends to believe that everything must end in blaming someone. He or she thinks all prospective employees are only out for themselves. Usually these managers feel the sole purpose of the employee's interest in the job is money. They will blame the person first in most situations, without questioning whether it may be the system, policy, or lack of training that deserves the blame. A Theory X manager believes that his or her employees do not really want to work, that they would rather avoid responsibility and that it is the manager's job to structure the work and energize the employee. One major flaw of this management style is it is much more likely to cause Diseconomies of Scale in large businesses.
...yet they send our family members over to foreign nations to kill masses of people in the name of "democracy" and send our loved ones to die themselves...