It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Carseller4
How many people worked in the WTC?
Nobody noticed anything unusual?
Originally posted by hdutton
For those who believe -- no explaination is necessary.
For those who do not believe -- no explaination will surfice.
Your own examples actually show that the WTC collapses were *not* controlled demolitions. The examples of legitimate CD you provide show that the collapse begins at the base of the building, while every video of the collapse of WTC 1 and 2 show the collapse began at the upper areas, at the precise location where the planes impacted the structures.
"[T]here was just an explosion [in the south tower]. It seemed like on television [when] they blow up these buildings. It seemed like it was going all the way around like a belt, all these explosions."--Firefighter Richard Banaciski
"I saw a flash flash flash [at] the lower level of the building. You know like when they demolish a building?"
--Assistant Fire Commissioner Stephen Gregory
"[I]t was [like a] professional demolition where they set the charges on certain floors and then you hear 'Pop, pop, pop, pop, pop'."
--Paramedic Daniel Rivera
It isn't your gut that's telling you there was a controlled demolitions. It's those damned fool conspiracy web sites deliberately instigating abject paranoia that telling you it was a controlled demolitions. Case in point- Take a look at your video again showing the collapse of WTC 7, and then look at the raw video of the collapse as it looked before they got their hands on it:
Originally posted by AshleyD
That is a good observation. Thanks for bringing that up. Does any of the following testimony about explosions at the base of the building refute that?
But there does seem to be others who vouch for explosions at the base. Is that possible? I know there is a lot of convolution when it comes to 9/11 'fact' so I just want the truth.
This is something that has gnawed at me for years- I've just been too intimidated by the whole heated nature of the 9/11 debates to ever ask.
Originally posted by Chrisfishenstein
reply to post by AshleyD
Everyone do me a favor....Take an empty toilet paper roll or paper towell roll and stand it up. Start a fire on the top and witness with your own eyes how fire works.....For a fire to burn 40 stories up in the air and cause a building to fall directly down is not only improbable but impossible.....There is nothing that can fall directly to the ground like that without first attacking the base of the structure....Look at the buildings around it also, they had fires and debris falling all over them and the other buildings didn't "crumble" to the ground.....I try to use logic and not listen to what anyone says.....
Forget absolutely everything you have ever heard about 9/11 and watch a video of the building collapsing, then make your judgement ON YOUR OWN!!!! Forget what people say and MSM and government and everyone else and make your own conclusions.....I feel you will believe the same thing I do....A FIRE WOULD NEVER AND COULD NEVER COLLAPSE A BUILDING STRAIGHT TO THE GROUND!!!
Originally posted by andy1972
It could be considered by some rather fishy that the only three steel framed buildings in the history of construction to collapse due to fire are WTC 1, WTC2 and WTC7. The Windsor hotel in Madrid burned intensely for 48 hours and it did'nt fall.
Originally posted by boondock-saint
Ashley, be rest assured
we WILL find out the truth
whether it be in this life time
or the next And they will
be judged at some time
in the future by the almighty.