reply to post by boondock-saint
Oh PLEASE don't be ridiculous
1/4 of "Anonymous" on 4ch alone
is at least 5-10x more people than what the FBI and CIA have
COMBINED, depending on what time of year it is. As I said, the biggest problem is that you, like most others, mis-identify Anonymous. It's like when
you want to refer to a certain species of elephants, you instead say "mammal" which is correct since elephants are mammals, but you fail to bring your
point across because instead of narrowing the possible group you are referring to, you broaden them.
There isnt much to infiltrate. That type of anonymous groups you are referring to have virtually NO leadership structure as I stated before. Anonymous
shares one aspect with for example the mythical Al-Qaida- they "both" operate in cells with no real knowledge over other cells/cores. To gain that
kind of knowledge, you must have been there when it branched off into thousands of different directions and started expanding over the net.
It originated on the internet in the 90's and expanded rapidly when 4chan was created in late 2003 by "m00t".
When m00t sold out to TPTB at around 2006, anon spread to other places over the Internet and started growing exponentially (to this day).
Continuing with this "kind of anon" you are referring to (It's almost like a new species so forgive me for using weird or confusing terminology.):
Each cell/core is different. Each cell acts/reacts differently and has different ways of "protesting" or fighting.
Some are extremely chaotic and do DDOS attacks on random sites like Mastercard, Visa and Sarah Palin's, with not much positive result. Others hack
secure servers and leak highly classified documents (Read 2 extremely interesting ones involving Lockheed Skunk-works + unknown, extremely advanced
tech back in the days when I was active).
Other cells are more sophisticated and carry out counter psy-ops but these are usually very small groups of highly skilled hackers who are talented in
a certain area. I don't have much knowledge on "that kind of anon" since it's dangerous to affiliate yourself with them but I have seen some of their
work and it wouldn't surprise me if they were active/ex CIA/NSA who have seen to much nasty # to remain passive (Maybe Assange? I don't know, he fits
the bill). Others yet are idiots who accept a leadership structure in their own cell and forfeit the ONLY strength anonymous has over TPTB which is
that there is no leadership structure to hijack or destroy. These anon are referred to as "cancer" by groups of anon that are on the same level and
who also share the same goals. These are also usually
the "Newfags" (inside terminology) that do it for "teh lulz".
I haven't even scratched the surface yet. All I can say is that it's an extremely sophisticated group of individuals varying from murderers to
military officers to Intelligence analysts to housewives who have something in common:
They KNOW something is wrong with the world, something some of them can't quite figure out but they can feel it and they are just FED UP of how we are
being treated by the elite.
REAL CHANGE- be it good or bad. That's anons' trademark if I had to give it one.
Originally posted by FTD Brat
reply to post by boondock-saint
Wow, I've never even heard of that before. Very interesting stuff.
That is the beauty of anonymous though. They are everyone while also being no one.
Exactly! You, my friend, get it!
edit on 13-6-2011 by edog11 because: (no reason given)