It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by bdn12
About the Concorde going M2.2 for thousands of miles: Yes, it cruised at supersonic speeds for thousands of miles, but not Mach 2.2. The fastest Atlantic crossing for the Concorde was around 2 hours and 53 minutes. The distance from New York to London is 3463 miles. If we do simple math, that averages out to a speed of ~1200 mph, which isn't Mach 2.2. Some other aircraft which could probably keep up with the Concorde are the TSR.2, B-58, and Mirage IV. Plus, those aircraft have aerial refueling, so in anything beyond about 4000 miles, the Concorde would be toast. The other obvious aircraft are the SR-71 and XB-70. SR-71 combines M3 speed with refueling. Even though the XB-70 didn't have aerial refueling, it could go Mach 3 for over 6000 miles.
Originally posted by Stoo
Guys, the thread is long dead - it got bumped from 2004.. You'll be arguing with ghosts
Originally posted by Stoo
Guys, the thread is long dead - it got bumped from 2004.. You'll be arguing with ghosts
Originally posted by WestPoint23
Some of us "ghosts" are still here though...
Originally posted by WestPoint23
As I've said before the Raptor's top speed is the speed at which the airframe starts to critically fail. It has enough thrust and low enough drag to cripple the airframe.
Originally posted by intelgurl
BOO!!!!!
Sorry, I couldn't help it...
Originally posted by jfj123
To put it in perspective, during mach tests, aurora reached mach 6+ as evidenced by quick sequential micro tremors registered by local richter scales near the nevada lake beds.
Originally posted by jfj123
I believe I read when in prototype stage the max speed was mach 3.0
To put it in perspective, during mach tests, aurora reached mach 6+ as evidenced by quick sequential micro tremors registered by local richter scales near the nevada lake beds.
My point being that your 2.84 approximation is probably sound for max speed with no headwind.
Originally posted by jfj123
headwind pushes at plane as plane goes into wind. Wind resistance could lower max capable speed.
Originally posted by jfj123
headwind is a limiting factor in max air speed. Thats the way it is. If it's a limiting factor on the ground in 2 dimensions, it's a limiting factor in the air in 3 dimensions.