It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Subsequent scientific anaysis of the photgraphs concluded that both objects were between 3 and 5 miles away from the camera, and that the jet was moving quickly, whilst the disk was moving relatively slowly or not at all.
Originally posted by DarkSide
the pics are fake,just look at the plane and then at the disc,it looks like the disc was put on the photo after they were taken
also that site shows the adamski ufo so it's just not credible
Originally posted by DarkSide
what are US F-14's doing in puerto rico?
Originally posted by kronos11
Ill just come back to this and give it a good bump up. I beckon all of you with your noses in the air and your eyes closed (debunkers) please come and explain to us how fake the photos are or how solid eyewitnesses are NEVER to believed. that is the one thing that bugs me about these kids who claim to deny ignorance... whenever a story like this pops it's head up on this site everyone is noticeably silent. (sound of crickets chirping here)
I can give you a number of ways to fake those pictures with a film camera, including repeat exposures, models, and messing during development. With scanned-in images the options for digital manipulation are numerous.
However, in a case like this the pictures are so poor, and the information so third-hand, that there's very little point in me commenting on it. It says the pictures were analysed by experts - in which case who? What did they find?
If there's a silence from 'debunkers' it's because it's very difficult to prove something or disprove something on the basis of poor evidence. All we can do is say what we think is probable given the available evidence.