It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Snippy23
Well, I followed your 'ebtx' link and found that it led me to a wide selection of material with deeply anti-Jewish and Holocaust-revisionist content.
Could it be that you don't really care about what's on the surface of Mars, so long as that content leads people to the hate hidden behind it? After all, it worked well for Ernst Zundel and his invention of Nazi UFOs.
Originally posted by madjetxe
There is atmosphere on moon and mars,there are mining machines there ,human colonies on moon and mars.The lie they don't need those suits.We have been lied too for many years, millennium..The evidence is everywhere,the
powers to be are preparing insurance policy(plausible deniability)WHEN AND IF THEY FAIL COMPLETING N.W.O.
'
Originally posted by paperface
The tubes are beyond odd yes,of all the pics of Mars I have seen I think the smoking gun is the so called "statue" photo.It resembles a being of some kind sitting on a rock.
When put to infared 2 round circles appear where the eyes would be.I also believe life on Mars has the abbility to camaflage itself.edit on 12-6-2011 by paperface because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by charlyv
My problem with the 'tubes' is that they directly mimic what sand dunes look like from space on the earth. Also, most of the 'tube' images are cropped out of a larger field that shows that when they open up in to large fields of sand, the fields have the same ripple shapes, albeit much longer and random. Another problem is the 'rings' which i think are just adjacent dunes that are arcing towards each other, creating the illusion of a ring.
The clincher for me is the areas of that have no 'rings' and those that have fragmented areas of arcs that seem randomly placed. What kind of architecture is that? - I would think that if they were artificial, they would be in much more of a perfected topographic arrangement. IMHO ----- As much as I would really like them to be non-natural, the evidence seems to weigh in to an affect that wind has on sand.
edit on 12-6-2011 by charlyv because: carity
Originally posted by watchZEITGEISTnow
Thanks op - looks the goods - remote viewing has been around for ages ala advanced meditation and astro traveling.
1956! Woah eh?! Wonder if the author has reincarnated into this era and posts at ATS ?
makes you wonder eh!?
S&F
Originally posted by thetiler
Originally posted by watchZEITGEISTnow
Thanks op - looks the goods - remote viewing has been around for ages ala advanced meditation and astro traveling.
1956! Woah eh?! Wonder if the author has reincarnated into this era and posts at ATS ?
makes you wonder eh!?
S&F
I wonder how he (Ernest Norman) new of tunnels going in and out of the mars surface when there were no close up photos of mars in the 1950's.But in the book he really gets into something out of a fiction book writing of mutant ants with intelligences of humans etc. At least I think that is what it read
Then I really get spooked out when i viewed a "Gonefishing" video (username on youtube) how he said he spotted creatures around caves and rocks and displayed them in a mars nasa photo.
And the strange thing is that this Nur El said that their are mutant ants on mars and they live in caves and rocks. At least that is what Ernest Norman stated. True or total fictions, I just don't know really!
Another strange thing is how this Nur El stated that there is growth in (either the north or south pole of mars. And that it grows in the seasons. That it is an algae like substance for food. Then you can see those pics in nasa photos, you can spot em on youtube or skippers site. Just google "skipper" you'll see it. Something like Anomalies Research etc. not sure the exact name. Just speculation! Sorry if I seem to go overboard on all this.