Your views on Outlaws and Vigilantes, page
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 3 times
Topic started on 12-6-2011 @ 09:59 AM by Wolvo
A couple nights ago i was watching a British film called "Outlaw". The plot is basically about a man who came back from the war in Afghanistan to a country he didn't even recognize no more. Drug dealers, Gangs, Pedophiles and so forth. So he gets a gang together and become outlaws, hunting down criminals through information given from a bent police officer.



This film got me thinking, almost every country in there history has had a famous vigilante or outlaws.

San Francisco Vigilantes of 1851 - Montana Vigilantes 1863 - The Skidmore Bully Case and the Unknown Vigilante 1980 - Bernhard Goetz, "The Subway Vigilante" 1981

And probably the most recent and infamous vigilante Jonathan "Jack" Idema, who after the 9/11 terror attacks went upon himself to go to Afghanistan and capture several men he believed to be terrorists.

Many outlaws and vigilantes come out of times of trouble and mounting pressure on societies which create a gap which in the eyes of some the law cant fill so they take it under there powers to be the judge and jury, and in some cases the executioner ( Judge Dredd )



So, my question to you ATS'ers is, What are your thoughts on rogue outlaws and vigilantes ? are they heroes or villains ? if a neighbor of yours went round killing, capturing rapists and kiddy fiddlers ? would you fear them or hail them ?

and one more question, if these people were captured, would you want them to have a reduced sentencing in the courts ?

My opinion, they would be heroes, and if caught to have a reduced sentencing, even gave a medal.


reply posted on 12-6-2011 @ 10:11 AM by Wolvo
reply to post by thecrow001



I agree Robin Hood is a good example, take from the rich to give to the poor. To be honest i think the morals of that story are a very good lesson for a kid.

I spose all vigilantes outlaws stick to that certain line, never to go over it, and like you say, to never forget what there doing.
edit on 12-6-2011 by Wolvo because: (no reason given)




reply posted on 12-6-2011 @ 10:12 AM by Poker
reply to post by Wolvo



For me it would depend on who they kill. Depending on whom they victimized Rapists, Pedophiles, Murders and Such, I'd support. Although Killing other types of criminals I'd be against.


reply posted on 12-6-2011 @ 10:30 AM by macman
Originally posted by Wolvo
reply to
post by thecrow001



I agree Robin Hood is a good example, take from the rich to give to the poor.


Actually, all the stories were about take from the Govt (King or de facto King) and give to the populace.
Basically the idea that the Govt's taxes were crushing the people, and thus taking the taxes back.
Not really the "Rich" in most regards.
edit on 12-6-2011 by macman because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 12-6-2011 @ 12:41 PM by Wolvo
reply to post by Aliensun



I agree, vigilante's are created by society themselves. And like a previous stated, what would the vigilante do once his agenda is complete? Would they just go back to normal living? If they commited murder, you would have to ask the question, has the vigilante only killed to enforce the punishment? Or commited murder because of his mental health? And justified the murder of a criminal with claiming vigilante?
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



The 51st State
  Posted 7 days ago with 3 member flags
America before the republican takeover
  Posted 18 days ago with 1 member flags
Now Europe is Going What is the UK\'s Plan
  Posted 3 days ago with 1 member flags