Originally posted by Corruption Exposed
Since when were factual observations immature content. Don't blame me if you don't like the way I deliver the real deal. Do you expect me to sugar
coat it for your obvious sensitivity to this issue?
MY obvious sensitivity? Lol, need I remind you that I could live on with the status quo for ever? It is not me who is sending silly ships only to have
them forced to turn around and end up in either casualties or a major waste of fuel and time wasted for nothing but pitiful attempts at making a bad
Once again, who are you to decide who gets aid and how it is delivered?
"I" am not one to decide, it's what my government does.
Also, who put you in the position to decide whether or not a method of delivering aid is "idiotic"?
I'm really not the one deciding that. The fact remains that none of the aid got through in any of these idiotic flotilla adventures that only ended up
in either a casualties disaster or a financial one. Yes it is idiotic, no I am not the one that decides it is, it is common sense that does it.
So once again you indirectly imply that these "innocent" people deserve to get "executed" due to their "idiotic" method of delivering aid just
because Israel does not condone their method, yet most of the world does.
Most of the world does? So why does most of the world choose the method of delivering aid through Israeli inspections? You can't honestly claim that
Israel has more say in this than most of the world, do you?
May I also ask what makes you properly informed on their prime priority.
The fact that they bring photographing equipment that equals or passes the worth of the so called aid?
The fact that they already know the IDF won't let them pass through yet they still insist on choosing this route?
The fact that people like you, eg; supporters of this idiocy, cheer and LOL at the fact that Israel is going to get bad PR over this more than the
fact that some people will get their aid?
Their prime priority is clearly to deliver aid.
No, if it was, they would choose to dock at Ashdod, and if the Israeli inspections are too much for them they could easily dock at Egypt and have
everything they want through. Why don't they do that? Oh yeah, actually delivering aid is not one of their priorities. Their top priority is to try to
make bad PR to Israel.
To assume that they are probably wanting to smuggle arms and or similar materials or any other type of foolishness is evidence that you are
brainwashed by the Zionist propaganda machine and that there is really no point discussing this matter with you, yet I will continue.
Not even once have I claimed that. These pansy activists probably don't have enough balls to carry around one pound of explosives on their ships.. As
I said, their goal is to try and catch Israeli soldiers "violently" forcing them back.
First of all, are you even aware of the UN aid that has been delivered into Gaza over the last few years?
A member left a link of allowed materials earlier in this thread. I suggest you view their link.
Oh yes I am perfectly aware of that. Maybe this will help you understand thing in a better way:
Hamas steals UN aid: UN source
Hamas steals UN aid: Washington post
I guess it's pretty hard to comprehend that after you allow some materials in, in order to build hospitals as you say, only to have it stolen by Hamas
to serve their malicious needs, you are not only forced to stop transferring the specific materials by the threatened country (Israel in this case),
you also refuse do to so yourself, just like the UN did.
UN aid to Gaza must first be analyzed by Israel which means most of it does not make it through.
Stated above just why.
We're talking building supplies to rebuild much needed infrastructure such as plumbing, electricity grid, schools and
"Minimal" aid into Gaza: Wikipedia
Regrettably I do not know exactly how much aid has been allowed through these crossings, but the reports have been very evident that the amount
of aid is minimal.
If this is what you call minimal - Hahahahahaha!
And this is just between 2008 and 2009. Heh.
A flotilla of 10 well equipped boats would easily be capable of delivering more aid than a few truck loads crossing the other available land
crossings via Israeli inspection.
Sure they would, if they only docked at Ashdod or Egypt. But no, they still insist on trying to break a well armed naval blockade only to prove a
Your request to compare the amount of aid from the Egyptian and Israeli crossing versus those of flotillas is plain stupid. There has been
virtually no aid allowed into Gaza via these flotillas due to Israeli interference. I can't believe you even asked me that question. I am beginning to
lose my patience with your lack of logical thought.
How is my logical thinking flawed? Just because you are ashamed to prove yourself wrong?
Even if the amount of aid that reached Gaza from Israel and Egypt would be 1 or 2 tonnes, it would still be 100% more than the aid reached via
flotillas. Why? because 0 kg has passed via flotillas.
This is the simplest logic ever and you are insisting it's flawed.
Oh well don't lose your patience just yet.
That's the second time you have called me immature in one post, you're on a roll buddy
You're going to have to forgive me for calling a boy by it's name.
As for you defending IDF navy ships committing piracy in international waters, I will let that one be and let you wallow in your own
What embarrassment? I'd be damn embarrassed if Israel let even one of those ships get through it's blockade. As long as we keep sending these pansy
hippies home from wherever they came from, I'm perfectly good.
It's you who is pissed about this situation buddy, not me.
I will admit that the government in Gaza is not the top model of a perfect government, but they were elected by their people.
Elected by the people.. what a joke. You try saying that when there's a guard with an armed AK47 standing in your voting booth, hinting you to vote
Hamas or die.
I would not call the Israeli government's actions "sane" either. The Israel government has been the root cause of most conflict in that region
for well over 60 years now.
That's very rich coming from you.
So let's not get off topic and start pointing fingers at which government has more skeletons in their closet, if we were to play that game
Israel would surely come out the loser.
The only one going off topic here is you. If there was a sane government in Gaza, they'd be independent. And if they will be independent, nobody in
Israel will tell them who or what can dock at their ports. Until that happens get ready for lots and lots of whining about Israeli ships forcing "aid"
BTW I was telling the government of Israel to go suck and egg, and for you to counter that and tell me to go suck an egg, tells me you are a
member or supporter of the Israeli government which leaves me no choice but to question your moral values and many other things. Good day sir
I was saying it is illogical to say that to the government that stops the ships you so eagerly want in Israel. Hello? We are in power here remember?
It's you who wants something to change?
The right thing to say, if anyone even wanted to use the go suck an egg thingy, was "if the activists don't like being forced back all the time they
can go suck a rotten egg".
I'm simply explaining you the flawed logic behind your immature bashing. Don't mistake me for someone who would ever say this stupid line to
Also, just for the sake of comparing both methods of delivering aid, here is a partial list of the aid that got through using the NORMAL method:
Now if you could provide a link that shows that these pathetic "peace flotillas" have brought even quarter of this amount into Gaza I will swallow my
own words and admit my logic is incredibly flawed.
I doubt you'd be able to do that tho, since flotillas haven't even managed to reach Gaza, let alone have any aid in there.
edit on 14-6-2011 by
IsraeliGuy because: (no reason given)