It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Richard Gage Live on Irish TV3

page: 1
3
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 11 2011 @ 08:34 AM
link   
911blogger.com...
www.youtube.com...


Good interview on Irish TV, its about 10 minutes and the hosts ask the standard questions like who did this but Gage comes back and says he offers forensic evidence and wants a new investigation.

At the end one presenter says its a fascinating question before going to the adverts and before that Gage says gravity works downwards and yet 90 per cent or so of the building was ejected outwards.

Two people can look at the same evidence and come to different conclusions but it seems to me Gage is right and the OS theory of planes, gravity and fire damage would not explain all the evidence - but I would love to be wrong.

Peace

Edit to add
TV3 is a free-to-air commercial television network in the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland and is owned by a private equity group - which strikes me as mental for a news provider but could explain in part why Ireland is in such financial trouble.

So now we are getting our news provided by private equity companies and we are supposed to think

edit on 11-6-2011 by yyyyyyyyyy because: (no reason given)




posted on Jun, 11 2011 @ 11:29 AM
link   
reply to post by yyyyyyyyyy
 


Gage says that 1500 architects have their reputations and their licenses on the line. Are we aware of any licensed professional engineer that has put their stamp to anything with regard to 9/11? Of course not, just another lie.



posted on Jun, 11 2011 @ 12:04 PM
link   

Originally posted by hooper
reply to post by yyyyyyyyyy
 


Gage says that 1500 architects have their reputations and their licenses on the line. Are we aware of any licensed professional engineer that has put their stamp to anything with regard to 9/11? Of course not, just another lie.


Angry rant Rant, off topic.

What would you have those architects stamp? They want to be part of a proper investigation, to have something they can put their name to, although I dont quite see how saying the investigation might be faulty, puts your license as an architect at risk, if architects require such a thing. Then again you hear of strange cases revolving around that subject in America at least.

Now try to make your next post about the interview instead of calling people liars and nazis. Did you ever think about anger management? I think you would really benefit from it Hooper.

To the OP do you have a little bit of info about the interviewee?
edit on 11-6-2011 by Cassius666 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 11 2011 @ 01:04 PM
link   
It's the same stuff he has said before.

But this is totally ridiculous after almost TEN YEARS.

Neal DeGrasse Tyson says he saw what happened on 9/11 but he has a book Death by Black Hole.

www.youtube.com...

Now how can you write about Black Holes and not know something about gravity? If you know about gravity then how can you not have some understanding about what it takes for a skyscraper to hold itself up? He should know something about the conservation of momentum also. I wouldn't spend 5 seconds thinking about buying his book.

9/11 is a travesty of science.

It should have been determined within SIX MONTHS that airliners could not do that.

psik



posted on Jun, 11 2011 @ 01:40 PM
link   
reply to post by psikeyhackr
 


9/11 is a travesty of science. It should have been determined within SIX MONTHS that airliners could not do that

But it's a triumph in behavioral psychology. I never thought to question the OS but looking at it, the science is a mess but I am not clever enough to really present it in a compelling way but it's all about the take down on the buildings.

To Cassius66, er I think it's ae911truth.org which will provide links to Gage, I should have added it for anyone new to the topic, my bad cms.ae911truth.org...



posted on Jun, 11 2011 @ 01:41 PM
link   
reply to post by Cassius666
 



Angry rant Rant, off topic.

What would you have those architects stamp? They want to be part of a proper investigation, to have something they can put their name to, although I dont quite see how saying the investigation might be faulty, puts your license as an architect at risk, if architects require such a thing. Then again you hear of strange cases revolving around that subject in America at least.

Now try to make your next post about the interview instead of calling people liars and nazis. Did you ever think about anger management? I think you would really benefit from it Hooper.

To the OP do you have a little bit of info about the interviewee?

Uh, whats with you and nazis? Where did I mention nazis? Thats the second time you accused me of calling someone a nazi when I never have. The nazis are gone. Except for a few arrested adolescents playing hitler games, there are no nazis. There are more than the world's fair share of bigots and anit-Semites out there, but the nazis are long gone.

I said he is lying because he stated that 1500 professionals are putting their license at risk and that is not true and he knows it which makes him a liar.

Really, what's with the imagined nazi innuendo? Me thinks you doth protest too much.



posted on Jun, 11 2011 @ 01:45 PM
link   
reply to post by hooper
 


Off topic but you did not mention nazi's and I don't know why the other poster mentioned it in context to you but I've never seen you make any nazi comments - just for the record

Peace

edit on 11-6-2011 by yyyyyyyyyy because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 11 2011 @ 01:49 PM
link   

Originally posted by yyyyyyyyyy
reply to post by hooper
 


Off topic but you did not mention nazi's and I don't know why the other poster mentioned it in context to you but I've never seen you make any nazi comments - just for the record

Peace


Thank you, did not mean to derail but I don't understand the constant accusation.

Again, sorry for the derail.



posted on Jun, 11 2011 @ 01:51 PM
link   
reply to post by hooper
 


No, no, it was not you that was off-topic, it was me replying to you, as a poster you have every right to defend yourself and ATS should pride itself on intelligent debate and that.

It should be a case of no harm no foul but the Godwin theory gets proved again.

Godwin's law (also known as Godwin's Rule of Nazi Analogies or Godwin's Law of Nazi Analogies)[1][2] is a humorous observation made by Mike Godwin in 1990[2] which has become an Internet adage. It states: "As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 1 (100%)."[3][2] In other words, Godwin put forth the hyperbolic observation that, given enough time, in any online discussion—regardless of topic or scope—someone inevitably criticizes some point made in the discussion by comparing it to beliefs held by Hitler and the Nazis.


edit on 11-6-2011 by yyyyyyyyyy because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 11 2011 @ 01:55 PM
link   
reply to post by hooper
 


Just because you don't know doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Does all info pass through you first? When people spend their time trying to discredit things maybe one should try to not look so obvious. If your an architect or an engineer maybe you should evaluate the information. I highly doubt you know anything about the subject what so ever.



posted on Jun, 11 2011 @ 02:08 PM
link   
reply to post by redrose123
 



Just because you don't know doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

I take it you are refering to some paper, report, etc. wherein one of the alleged 1500 architects and engineers (there aren't by the way) has officially put his/her seal on some document thereby putting their personal license at risk. Have you seen any? I haven't. I've looked. So, to date, I am going to say that none exist. Perfectly reaonable.

Does all info pass through you first?

So pass some through me. Show me a signed and sealed document by one of these supposed architects and engineers.

When people spend their time trying to discredit things maybe one should try to not look so obvious.

Hey, so show me where I am wrong. I said I am not aware of any.

If your an architect or an engineer maybe you should evaluate the information.

What information? You mean that laundry list of incredulities? That's not information.

I highly doubt you know anything about the subject what so ever.

The subject is BS and I am a highly qualified detector.



posted on Jun, 11 2011 @ 02:18 PM
link   

Originally posted by yyyyyyyyyy
reply to post by hooper
 


No, no, it was not you that was off-topic, it was me replying to you, as a poster you have every right to defend yourself and ATS should pride itself on intelligent debate and that.

It should be a case of no harm no foul but the Godwin theory gets proved again.

Godwin's law (also known as Godwin's Rule of Nazi Analogies or Godwin's Law of Nazi Analogies)[1][2] is a humorous observation made by Mike Godwin in 1990[2] which has become an Internet adage. It states: "As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 1 (100%)."[3][2] In other words, Godwin put forth the hyperbolic observation that, given enough time, in any online discussion—regardless of topic or scope—someone inevitably criticizes some point made in the discussion by comparing it to beliefs held by Hitler and the Nazis.


edit on 11-6-2011 by yyyyyyyyyy because: (no reason given)


Yes I've heard that before and think it is often accurate, however, this is new twist - what do you call it when you are not accused of being[/] a nazi but when you are falsely accused of accusing someone else of being a nazi? It would appear to me that the poster I was responding to has been accused of being a nazi so often that he/she just assumes that you are accusing them. Which probably tells you a little bit about the poster.



posted on Jun, 11 2011 @ 02:26 PM
link   
reply to post by hooper
 


You are the only one making Nazi accusations. I have seen you doing it a lot. People can check your posting history and check for themselves. I have also noticed you are very very angry. Especially if people do not share your views it makes you really angry, to the point that you can no longer control yourself and say things that you SHOULD regret. Again people can look up your posting history. This is not mean in an accusatory way, just see it as good advice to get help with your problems. We are not your adversaries or even enemies. You seem to think you have adversaries or even enemies on this board. That would explain your paranoia, sense of persecution, not to mention unprovoked aggressions and transgressions, which do not help your credibility at all, quite the contrary.

To the OP good interview. Is it really true, that architects in America, who pursue 911 in any way, put themselves at risk?
edit on 11-6-2011 by Cassius666 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 11 2011 @ 04:14 PM
link   

Originally posted by Cassius666
reply to post by hooper
 


You are the only one making Nazi accusations. I have seen you doing it a lot. People can check your posting history and check for themselves. I have also noticed you are very very angry. Especially if people do not share your views it makes you really angry, to the point that you can no longer control yourself and say things that you SHOULD regret. Again people can look up your posting history. This is not mean in an accusatory way, just see it as good advice to get help with your problems. We are not your adversaries or even enemies. You seem to think you have adversaries or even enemies on this board. That would explain your paranoia, sense of persecution, not to mention unprovoked aggressions and transgressions, which do not help your credibility at all, quite the contrary.

To the OP good interview. Is it really true, that architects in America, who pursue 911 in any way, put themselves at risk?
edit on 11-6-2011 by Cassius666 because: (no reason given)


Please, check my posting history. Please point out wherein I accused anyone of being a nazi. All my post are there. Anti-Semitic, sure, nazi, no. Unless you, for whatever reason, automatically equivocate being accused of anti-Semitism with being a nazi. They are not the same thing. Anti-Semitism existed long before the reign of the national socialist party in Germany and has continued to exist long after it.

Angry? My heavens, no. Amused? Absolutely. Do I sense I am being persecuted, why should I?

As for the architects being put at risk, I don't think there are more than half a handful who have ever said anything so its really a moot point. I am sure there is a sprinkling of a few "inside jobbers" in some professions but the bottom line is there isn't enough in society as a whole to make even a ripple of difference.



posted on Jun, 11 2011 @ 04:25 PM
link   
reply to post by hooper
 


I can only repeat that I am not your enemy. If your behaviour causes somebody else on here to view you in that way I dont know. I can only repeat that there is no shame in seeking help if you think its appropriate, unfortunately I am not in a position to reach out to you. Your personal network and professionals in your area are in a better position to do so.


Originally posted by yyyyyyyyyy
911blogger.com...
www.youtube.com...




If somebody who knows his stuff along with an army of colleagues with an education in a related field, says a new investigation should be performed, we should take that seriously. He isnt the only one speaking out and it aint like he is an Afghani or an Irani. Is there evidence all those professionals have been payed off, by Iran or a similiar power?
edit on 11-6-2011 by Cassius666 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 11 2011 @ 04:58 PM
link   
reply to post by Cassius666
 



I can only repeat that I am not your enemy. If your behaviour causes somebody else on here to view you in that way I dont know. I can only repeat that there is no shame in seeking help if you think its appropriate, unfortunately I am not in a position to reach out to you. Your personal network and professionals in your area are in a better position to do so.

Did you find that post yet wherein I accused of being a nazi?

If somebody who knows his stuff along with an army of colleagues with an education in a related field, says a new investigation should be performed, we should take that seriously.

Yes we should, however, that hasn't happened yet.

He isnt the only one speaking out

Yeah, he pretty much is. Maybe a half a handful of others but no more than think that the moon is made of cheese or that there are secret unicorn farms.

and it aint like he is an Afghani or an Irani.

No it ain't!!

Is there evidence all those professionals have been payed off, by Iran or a similiar power

No there ain't! So based on that revelation we can now safely establish a new standard - if any so-called professional calls for anything we must accomodate that call as long as no evidence exist that the so-called professional in question has not taken money from Iran. Or Afghanistan. What about Israel? If a professional doesn't take money from Israel and calls for an investigation of all those that think 9/11 was inside job should we accomodate them with an investigation?



posted on Jun, 11 2011 @ 05:18 PM
link   

Originally posted by hooper
reply to post by yyyyyyyyyy
 


Gage says that 1500 architects have their reputations and their licenses on the line. Are we aware of any licensed professional engineer that has put their stamp to anything with regard to 9/11? Of course not, just another lie.



Here you go. Maybe you can start your own research on professionals who don't believe the Official Fairy Tale.
www2.ae911truth.org...

From - www.ae911truth.org...

What field are you in that relates to this topic? I will admit that I am not in a field that does, that is why I would look to the professionals. The independent professionals not the dupes the US Government supplies.

Oh the horror of a new investigation. Only those with something to hide wouldn't want this. No I don't mean you. But why don't you want a deeper investigation? Are you truly satisfied with what you've been spoon fed?
edit on 11-6-2011 by CourageousEyesoftheHeart because: (no reason given)

edit on 11-6-2011 by CourageousEyesoftheHeart because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 11 2011 @ 06:12 PM
link   
reply to post by CourageousEyesoftheHeart
 



Oh the horror of a new investigation. Only those with something to hide wouldn't want this. No I don't mean you. But why don't you want a deeper investigation? Are you truly satisfied with what you've been spoon fed?


Oh please tell me all about this new investigation. Who leads it? What is the scope? How is it funded? What powers does it have? Who are the investigators? What are you gonna do when the new investigation is all over and the conclusion is the same?



posted on Jun, 11 2011 @ 06:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by hooper
What are you gonna do when the new investigation is all over and the conclusion is the same?


Unless it comes to the conclusion that Bush, and/or the Jews did it, they will ignore it and push for another new investigation until they get the answer they want. That it was the Jews and/or Bush!



posted on Jun, 11 2011 @ 09:32 PM
link   

Originally posted by spoor

Originally posted by hooper
What are you gonna do when the new investigation is all over and the conclusion is the same?


Unless it comes to the conclusion that Bush, and/or the Jews did it, they will ignore it and push for another new investigation until they get the answer they want. That it was the Jews and/or Bush!


I think you are confused. Architects and engineers can only investigate what caused the collapse, as in what forces. Who carried it out is not their field of expertise. There is no way the result will turn out the same and the 911 deniers have a similar sentiment, else there wouldnt be such a strong sentiment from their part against an independent investigation.

Also if somebody names names and shows faces, he does just that. Nobody can help it if some of the implicated people are jewish. It does not mean the jews did it. When a jew is on trial, it does not mean all of jewentry is on trial.

Americans can implicate Americans or their secret service of misdeeds without being seen as anti-American.
Those who go out of their way to call people Nazis should look up who the Nazis were and what they did.
edit on 11-6-2011 by Cassius666 because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
3
<<   2 >>

log in

join