It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by nataylor
I would think "faking" everything in such a consistent manner would actually be the far more complicated solution, compared to actually doing it.
Originally posted by pshea38
Fair enough. I was fooled by camera fakery and humbly eat my words.
In all the moon voyages, no-one thought it would be worthwhile to capture,
for posterity, images from the moon, of the moon with the firmament in all its
glorious nakedness in the backround? I won't believe that they didn't have the
necessary technology and they certainly would have had the desire. It's just that they didn't
have the opportunity. So they faked everything. It's the simplest solution to the
multitude of physical obstacles and beyond suspicious photographic evidence presented.
As for the radiation, it's a much larger problem to permanently-manned bases and multi-month trips to Mars, but it's simply not insurmountable for a couple-week trip to the moon and back.
Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by pshea38
If you're going to claim that the "crater fields are identical," the least you can do is superimpose the images over one another so we can compare them properly. It's perfectly obvious from the side-by-side comparison that they are not identical.
Originally posted by PsykoOps
They aren't the same and why must you spout these lies that have all been debunked about a million times here and other places? Could you just come up with something original?
It is perfectly obvious that the above and below screenshot comparisons are way too close
for any comfort whatsoever.
Originally posted by Anunakki
And a telescope picture and you are quick to live in a bliss, i understand...