It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by JR MacBeth
reply to post by Version100
It has nothing to do with not "allowing" people to see live specimens with an SEM, it just isn't possible...
"If" the Rife microscope could see "live" organisms the size of viruses (irrespective of the above poster who thinks using the word "live", and "virus" is somehow silly), then what "might" we see? (Suspend the thought that alternate ideas are automatically "impossible" for a moment.)
Could an organism "morph" into something "different"? This is the point, and this is what Rife found, and the implications are staggering. We generally accept that science "knows" about this sort of thing, and yet, how much could they know, if they are not able to observe an entire living process? Is an "amoeba", always an amoeba?
Sure, it's a lot of speculation at this late date, but if we allow that Rife was able to observe living processes with his microscope, that modern equipment can't seem to do today, then maybe we can leave the door open a bit.
OR, is there a new microscope that can see very small living samples now? If not, why? I'm not saying we need to get down to individual atoms, but how far down can we go, without requiring death? Was Rife's machine finding something controversial? Could this be why the government supposedly has 4 of the 6 machines?
Sounds a lot like what we hear about Tesla, and how the government confiscated a lot of his material. Maybe we should just "trust" that they have our best interests at heart, and were just protecting us from wanton discoveries?