It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I didn't say anything about the dynamic in nature of masculine/feminine. I totally believe that. You know nothing about me, yet continue to spout ignorance about me. Again, you are wrong. You don't know me.
Being gay does not preclude a person from being able to procreate, it simply makes them less likely to procreate (and that is only if we revert to the strict biological definition of procreation. Which is about as reasonable in the 21st century as believing that you can fall off the edge of the Earth if you sail to far East or West!).
And I am sorry, but no matter how much Tradition, or East/West spitiuality you fall back on, you're just making the same old tired arguement: MY belief system is older/more popular/more "whatever" than yours and so I must be right and you must be wrong!
Originally posted by dontreally
reply to post by Thoriumisbest
Well, im not wrong.
I dont mean to offend anyone.
But the fact is: Desires CAN be changed. This is a basic fact, known since time immemorial, but due to propaganda/social factors, can be difficult to understand.
You being a gay man (i assume) i can understand your reservation. Youve probably already come to terms with this. But, as i said in the beginning: mystics, philosophers and metaphysicians know full well the truth of what i say.
If you want to justify homosexuality, it cannot by definition be justified as a "law" of ones physical constitution, but as a moral preference. It is a moral decision at the end of the day.
And this is why i dont bring it up to my cousin. He can do what he wants - his moral life is in his hands.
All that i have ever explained to him is this. That the mind is plastic; that desire, feelings, etc, can be changed. Thats all ive said.
I havent preached to him about doing what G-d wants you to do, or what is in tune with the dynamics of creation (he wouldnt appreciate such an argument anyways). So, i just let him know how things are.
Whether he agrees/disagree is irrelevant. Its as clear as day to anyone with self knowledge.
Originally posted by dontreally
reply to post by Bhadhidar
Being gay does not preclude a person from being able to procreate, it simply makes them less likely to procreate (and that is only if we revert to the strict biological definition of procreation. Which is about as reasonable in the 21st century as believing that you can fall off the edge of the Earth if you sail to far East or West!).
HUH? So now its primitive and outdated to procreate biologically? Wow. Your mind is straight out of Brave New World.
And I am sorry, but no matter how much Tradition, or East/West spitiuality you fall back on, you're just making the same old tired arguement: MY belief system is older/more popular/more "whatever" than yours and so I must be right and you must be wrong!
I havent made that argument. No where did i make that argument. In fact - the point of this thread was to challenge the myth and propaganda duping people into believing that homosexuality is an irreversible state of being.
However, since this has turned into a moral question.
Morally, as i explained elsewhere (but of course will be uninteresting to an "enlightened" person such as yourself) the ideal - the morality we should live up to - is present in the natural dynamic in creation. Between the feminine and masculine. These two are meant to unite in total equanimity. A man with a man is not a reflection of this spiritual dynamic, but infact goes completely against it. Thus, it is 'immoral' to not follow G-ds will, present throughout the physical creation. Us superior creatures with the ability to reason should use that G-d given reason to do what is right; to follow the creators will.
HUH? Im not a christian. Have you even be reading my posts? What do you think is meant by "metaphysical"? The bible is allegory. It is a Metaphysical philosophy cloaked in symbolic narratives.
Im a Bible believer, and you know that. The Torah explicitly says "a male shall not lay with another male". Metaphysically this makes total sense.
And secondly, any person remotely understanding of Judaism understands how incredibly honored woman are by men
Originally posted by dontreally
Anyways. I have no problem with my cousin. I love him and will love him regardless of his decision towards his homosexual impulses. That being said, i do not - for religious reasons - approve of his homosexuality. I dont think its right that hes in a relationship with a man, and i especially disapprove of anal sex/oral sex etc.
I'll get to my reasoning for this later, but for now, i will endeavor to explain something completely known and understood to mystics/philosophers and those acquainted with the subject of metaphysics, which is: Feelings are not permanant - and this includes the lower, raw, foundation feeling of ones sexual predilection.
In Kabbalistic thought, the sephira (archetype) representing the sexual drive is Yesod - which literally means "foundation". In other words, all emotional energy is centered in ones sexuality or "libido" (an appropriate idea).
Now, im in no way saying that everyone who attempts to correct or align their consciousness - which is dominantly feminine(in the case of a male)- with their physical body - which is masculine - will always suceed. Their might be cases where it might not ever happen. But nonetheless, fundamentally speaking, one CAN change his desires - for anything, it just takes an understanding of the nature of the psyche.
.
From what i have learned about myself, if one wants to overcome something deemed 'negative', he/she has to first accept it. He has to accept that if it manifests, or comes, he must not be afraid of it. Thus, acceptance is how one overcomes the original fear. If one fears that which he doesnt want, he will only draw it toward him. This is a fundamental fact of psychology. With this explained, for one to overcome his sexual impulses, he has to first accept that this is how he currently feels. If the feelings manifest, he must accept that they exist - not permanantly - but at that particular moment in time
Whats also needed is a bit of imagination. You have to desire the opposite - and the most important thing in stressing this point is: DO NOT FEAR OR ASSUME YOU ARE UNABLE TO BE ATTRACTED TO THE OTHER SEX. Homosexuals have from the earliest age, or time when theyve discovered that their sexual impulses were wrong, or unnatural, that they are unable to feel an attraction to the other sex. In other words, there is a deep emotional complex attached to their sexual feelings. The inability to arouse the desire to them is a depressing and painful feeling; and because this is so, it prevents them from ever cultivating such feelings. How then do you overcome this conundrum? In my experience, to accept that you might not always succeed. And - that you HAVE THE ABILITY - FUNDAMENTALLY SPEAKING - to change your desires. Thus, the great cure lies in BELIEF - and only through belief can the seemingly impossible be achieved.
Freud said all men/women are bi-sexual. I think this statement is misleading - as if all people naturally feel an equal attraction to both sexes. I would change this and say: All people can potentially become sexually aroused by ANYTHING. Men, women or animals and all fetishes in between. ALL Things any wild imagination can conjure up, can potentially serve as a point of attraction. The key is to become attuned to a particular spirit or energy or in jungian terms, 'archetype' which lies beyond the subjects current frame of awarness. This is where imagination and visualization comes into play.
Now, with all this explained. Why then is it so difficult for so many gays and lesbians to overcome their feelings? What is standing in their way - between how they feel, and how they want to feel?
Enter into the equation: the social consciousness. We are all conditioned by our environment whether we like it or not. How the 'environment' thinks, we will also think, or at the very least be influenced by its dynamics of thought. If my environment says homosexuality is natural, and that "fundamentally", ones sexual feelings are "hardwired" into their constitution, they will be confronted by an ENORMOUS energy and thus a belief that how they feel is natural - but at the same time, for religious reasons, or social reasons, or moral reasons, they cannot come to proper terms with it.
This society we live in has an agenda. And this agenda lies in Liberalism. The word Liberal (and i like to mention this) comes from the latin word "liber", who was the Roman Dionysus. Thus, the ideal of being 'liberal', and accepting of all things, is really a return to the worship of Liber/Dionysus/Bacchus. This is all it is, and that is precisely why philologists resurrected this word to signify the Hellenistic/pagan prerogative. Liber/Dionysus is beyond all bounds. Being the god of wine - he is inherently unstable, unbalanced, in a "stupor" so to speak. He can not appreciate "one thing from another" - as alcohol causes one to feel. The god of wine destroys all inhibition, and it is this inhibition which the social architects - pagans - seek to purge from society.
So why cant homosexuals overcome their feelings? Because the beliefs of others creates in them doubts. The 'god' society - a collective energy/psychological template', has become the major obstacle to their understanding that their feelings can be overcome. But because they are so encompassed by doubters - and Gay pride movements, and others who think the complete opposite, they cannot help but ponder that how they feel might be permanent. That what others say is true; it cannot be changed.
This is why in the CNN promo which seeks to TERRIFY gays and us - non gays - into accepting the reality the conditioners want us to accept - that homosexuality CANNOT be reversed. That to think otherwise is evil, and indeed, judging by the tone of this documentary, criminal, presents several examples of men who grew up gay, went through therapy to reverse their feelings, only to kill themselves in the end. This is a form of moral terrorism.
Im not going to judge or moralize to my cousin. I dont think he is philosophical, or reasonable enough to not be offended by my opinions, and because i love him, and respect him, i dont want to cause him confusion, anxiety or jeapordize our relationship. I believe G-d puts us in our situations for a reason. If youre born gay - its not to remain gay - but to overcome the challenge. If due to his current circumstances i feel hes not in a position to respond ammenably to my help, then i have no choice but to tolerate this.
Originally posted by dontreally
Morally, as i explained elsewhere (but of course will be uninteresting to an "enlightened" person such as yourself) the ideal - the morality we should live up to - is present in the natural dynamic in creation. Between the feminine and masculine. These two are meant to unite in total equanimity. A man with a man is not a reflection of this spiritual dynamic, but infact goes completely against it. Thus, it is 'immoral' to not follow G-ds will, present throughout the physical creation. Us superior creatures with the ability to reason should use that G-d given reason to do what is right; to follow the creators will.