It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by deesul69
reply to post by incrediblelousminds
Yes, and that is the only point that I agree with the anti-gun advocates.
Identification should be required to purchase a firearm to verify a person is who they say they are, and avoid a deadly weapon getting in the wrong hands legally, just as a person should verify their identity to vote to ensure that a vote does not get into the wrong hands.
It's not a hard concept.
And I DO beleive in a strict enterpretation of the constitution. But apply common sense as well. DUH!!
Originally posted by mishigas
reply to post by deesul69
Don't be tricked - he will use the argument that a voter ID requirement is nowhere in the Constitution. Well, that doesn't mean it can't b implemented; there are many things not written into the Constitution that are laws.edit on 11-6-2011 by mishigas because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by incrediblelousminds
Originally posted by mishigas
reply to post by deesul69
Don't be tricked - he will use the argument that a voter ID requirement is nowhere in the Constitution. Well, that doesn't mean it can't b implemented; there are many things not written into the Constitution that are laws.edit on 11-6-2011 by mishigas because: (no reason given)
And yet many of the same people saying there should be a BIG GOVERNMENT requirement for photo ID for voting are the very same people who reject various laws as being 'unconstitutional'.
I guess we see they are not actually interested in preserving the Constitution, but merely use that as a talking point when it suits their political goals.
Originally posted by mishigas
reply to post by deesul69
Don't be tricked - he will use the argument that a voter ID requirement is nowhere in the Constitution. Well, that doesn't mean it can't b implemented; there are many things not written into the Constitution that are laws.edit on 11-6-2011 by mishigas because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by deesul69
This should be such a non-issue!! Every time I vote, I ask if they'd like to see ID, and I'm appauled by the fact that you don't need ID to vote. It should be a requirement to show a photo ID to vote.
Are you kidding me? This is the 21st century. What legal, functioning citizen doesn't have a photo ID?
Just as an example, how many of you posting on this thread do not have a valid photo ID?
And don't give me that crap that it goes against the poor. You mean to tell me that somebody can't afford the $10 to get an ID? I bust my ass for over 60 hours/week to provide a good life for my family!! Maybe they should get off their ass and WORK!! Then they can afford an ID!!
I'll tell you what. If it's required to show a photo ID to purchase a firearm, it should definitely be required to verify your identity, which is way higher up on the list than voting (2nd amendment vs 12th). The 2nd amendment gets stepped on all the time, and just because somebody makes a law (which shouldn't be anything new) about simply verifying you are who you say you are in order to vote, all the bleeding heart liberals get their panties in a bunch!!
List of things you need an ID for:
1- firearms purchase
2- driving
3- buying alcohol
4- buying cigarettes
5- getting a job
6- requesting certified copies of documents (birth/death/marriage certificates, etc.)
7- receiving welfare
8- shipping/receiving certain types of packages
9- receiving health care
Among many others!!
If you do not have a photo ID, you obviously are not enough of a functioning member of society (probably a crackhead) to decide who should be running the show, anyway, and we're better off without your vote.
I am absolutely not racist, and beleive that every citizen has the right to vote, and definitely should exercise it!! But you should be required to prove your identity to do so. There are 3 year old children that have state ID's. Let's get real here, people, and use some common sense.edit on 11-6-2011 by deesul69 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by wasco2
Originally posted by DZAG Wright
The issue in Florida was, Republicans were using voter intimidation and trickery. Such things as telling minorities the polls were closed while allowing people they assumed to be Repubs (white) in.
A proven lie.
www.blueeyedtex.com...
www.davidstuff.com...
edit on 11-6-2011 by wasco2 because: include link
Originally posted by vor78
Originally posted by DZAG Wright
Either you're for freedom or you're not...can't pick and choose.
I suppose in a simplistic world with simplistic viewpoints, that may be. In reality, however, there are two types of rights that must be considered. One is the individual right to vote. The other is the collective right of the entire citizenry to a free and fair election. The question is, if there is reason to believe that rampant vote fraud occuring, at what point does an individual's right to vote with minimal government intrusion infringe upon the public's right to a free and fair election?
Again, this all goes back to the principle of 'reasonable restrictions' on your constitutional rights as an individual. We can argue all day about what constitutes reasonable, but it is an undeniable fact that the government can limit certain individual freedoms in order to protect the rights of others. You cannot yell fire in a crowded theater, for instance. You can't slander someone without legal repercussions. You can't set up a few empty beer cans and have a target practice session in the middle of the street in NYC. All these are reasonable restrictions on your individual rights placed in order to protect collective rights. And maybe, just maybe, you need to be able to conclusively prove your identity in order to ensure a fair electoral process for the public as a whole. That's the question here.
edit on 11-6-2011 by vor78 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Antiquated1
Originally posted by daddyroo45
Could you give a good reason why someone that is a citizen of this country,would not have some form of identification ? I mean if they will take the time to vote,why not take the time to get a proper id.
Can you explain to me why someone that is a citizen of this country would have a photo ID? This is about photo ID. Not a SS card or birth certificate. PHOTO ID. Why would a citizen have a photo ID?
A recent national survey sponsored by the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law reveals that millions of American citizens do not have readily available documentary proof of citizenship. Many more – primarily women – do not have proof of citizenship with their current name. The survey also showed that millions of American citizens do not have government-issued photo identification, such as a driver’s license or passport. Finally, the survey demonstrated that certain groups – primarily poor, elderly, and minority citizens – are less likely to possess these forms of documentation than the general population.
As many as 11 percent of United States citizens – more than 21 million individuals – do not have government-issued photo identification.
Elderly citizens are less likely to possess government-issued photo identification.
Minority citizens are less likely to possess government-issued photo identification.
Citizens with comparatively low incomes are less likely to possess photo identification.
Read moreedit on 10-6-2011 by Antiquated1 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by mishigas
reply to post by DZAG Wright
I'm conservative and have never tried to hide it. You, however, are a screaming lib who is ashamed to admit it. You employ typical lib tactics of casting insults when your 'logic' fails you.
That word "logic" is the problem. Use common sense. I know many many people, even criminals and I have NEVER EVER come across someone committing voter fraud in that manner! No one cares that much except you Conservatives!
Originally posted by deesul69
reply to post by incrediblelousminds
Maybe you can start a campaign to add the:
28th Amendment- Allowing illegals, felons, and liars to fraudlently vote. Ratified 7-4-2011
1.The right of the illegal immigrants to vote fraudulently without proper identification shall not be infringed.
2. The right of felons not allowed to vote legally to defraud the polling system by not verifying their identification shall not be infringed.
3. Anybody who is not a functioning member of society shall be able to use somebody else's name to cast a vote for the official of their choice, no matter how illegal it may be.
4. Photo identification shall be outlawed from this day forward, for all purposes, and our country can be flushed down the toilet completely.
Then you're argument would be preserving the constitution, and I could no longer stick to a strict interpretation of it!!
reply to post by mishigas
You get a star, my friend.
Unfortunately some do not realize that the Constitution has nothing to do with this discussion.
The US constitution only deals with the Electors, and amendments 15,19,24, and 26, which apply to race, sex, poll tax, and age. None of it grants you the right to vote without ID.
Your votes are what cause the elector for your state decide who they will cast their vote for.
I can possibly see it going against certain state's constitutions, I may be wrong. I'm sure I'm not. Just figured I'd let this argument roll on.
And I DO beleive in a STRICT interpretation of the constitution!!
Just like STATES control gun purchases and ownership. You can privately transfer a firearm without ID in many states. It shouldn't be that way, but it is, and has nothing to do with the constitution, maybe the 14th amendment?
Originally posted by mishigas
reply to post by DZAG Wright
I'm conservative and have never tried to hide it. You, however, are a screaming lib who is ashamed to admit it. You employ typical lib tactics of casting insults when your 'logic' fails you.
That word "logic" is the problem. Use common sense. I know many many people, even criminals and I have NEVER EVER come across someone committing voter fraud in that manner! No one cares that much except you Conservatives!
If no one can find a case of this type of voter fraud to show me after like 4 people asked and this many pages, then why can't anyone at least admit they have no problem being afraid of something that does not exist. It is one or the other and the first one has not come to pass yet.
Originally posted by DZAG Wright
See how STUPID some peoples are?
Originally posted by incrediblelousminds
And yet many of the same people saying there should be a BIG GOVERNMENT requirement for photo ID for voting are the very same people who reject various laws as being 'unconstitutional'.