It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Maslo
Whats wrong with single payer system? We have single payer system here, and its working well. Its the most logical form of healthcare possible.
Seems like you want mutually impossible thing Neo - to provide quality healthcare for those poor who cant afford it, without taking money from others.
- stealing money through taxes to pay for poor peoples healthcare
- poor people dying from treateble ilnesses
Pick lesser evil, Neo. There is simply no third option.
Originally posted by neo96
no kidding it is the step that will lead to it destroying the current system so that it will be needed.
the question i want to be answered in this thread:
would you want a single entity( oil company) setting the price of gasoline in this country ??
yes or no ?
they use to call that a monopoly guess its lost its meaning.
edit on 10-6-2011 by neo96 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by TheWalkingFox
Originally posted by neo96
So i am sitting here thinking to myself of the stupidity of a single payer system for healthcare.
Does that explain the noise? I thought that was the wind howling through an empty cave!
Obama Care aka the care act
The care act is actually something you would probably support - it's an effort to federally deregulate alcohol, and place that regulation in states' hands (HR 1161). You want the Affordable Care Act. Moving on.
is exactly designed to do one thing to make healthcare so expensive and to break the system that the all knowing all powerful all benevolent entity known as the federal government come to the rescue to a problem for which it already created.
Know what the irony is? Corporations doing this is exactly why there needed to be such federal action.
Private Healthcare is the best in this country and no one can deny that fact for we the people altho one could argue our us congressmans healthcare is substantial better than private care.
Private health care is currently hte only health care in this country, barring the VA. Even congresspeople don't get state care - they simply have their private care covered by federal monies. And the VA isn't doing too hot because its funding keeps getting cut
See, here's the trick.
1) Corporations want to buy out hte public sector. They hire lobbyists to convince politicians that hte public system "doesn't work"
2) Those politicians, not wanting to spend money on stuff that doesn't work, vote to cut funding for the public systems
3) The system in question, lacking money to cover its needs, begins to fail
4) Voters like you, having about all the brains of your average lizard, see the failing system and demand that it be thrown away, rather than re-funded.
5) Politicians sell the system to private corporations at a loss (that is, at great profit for the corporations).
6) Quality does not improve, user costs go up, but hey, it's now the only game in town.
private healthcare works for the simply fact that is is profit driven and it makes it money counting on the health of younger people who can goes 10 or 20 years without using it and they finance those who do use it and the biggest reason it works it people pay for it so what i will call it is you pay for it care.
The profit motive is actually exactly WHY privatized health care doesn't work.
See, there's more money to be made in substandard care, medicines that treat symptoms rather than cure diseases, and denying insurance claims, than there is to be had in keeping the customer healthy, addressing the disease when needed, and honoring your insurance claims.
A corporation is beholden to the bottom line, not the well-being of its customers, as I'm sure you understand. When translated into the arena of health care, this is an enormous problem.
medicare is designed for those disabled and older people who do use their care on a daily basis which has strict government guidelines and rules and regulations and is non profit and they also pay for it with a clear difference between private care aka you pay for it care is that there is everyone using it unlike the period of time that most people do not use private healthcare.
Clearly punctuation is a socialist plot that shell not be tolerated.
medicaid is designed for those who cant afford healthcare and receive substantial less quality care than private healthcare and somewhat on par with medicare with exception those receiving it isnt paying for it those other people are.
Yup, substandard care is what happens when a program like this is regularly underfunded.
So what we have here is:
private healthcare
medicare
medicaid
then comes along obama and his wonderful wisdom of obama care making people in the first time in this nations history buy a good or service.
many people who couldnt afford healthcare are now mandated to buy something they couldnt afford to buy in the first place so what will end up happening are two things.
No they're not. I encourage you to read the actual law, rather than simply what someone else tells you about it. There is no mandate to purchase insurance; however, if you do not purchase private insurance, you will be given a few for your automatic coverage under an applicable government insurance program.
While i myself find this provision questionable (it's basically a giveaway to private insurers who are already ripping off their clients) it's not actually what you're saying it is.
people will be footing the bill agian for more than they previously were and the skyrocketing cost of healthcare that was already skyrocketing.
The skyrocketing costs of health care are due to extensive privatization. Remember, profits to be made? And since health care really isn't a competitive market (what, are you going to shop around for hte best emergency room fees?) there's no adequate "check" for the price gouging on the market, nor is there actual incentive for providers to undercut one another; it's a situation of collusion and price fixing.
for those who think its a great thing think agian obama care is designed to crash the system it will kill off competition to the point that something will have to be done "never letting a crisis" go to waste obama and the powers that be will impliment a single payer system.
Good. A system where everyone pays in a small amount to cover those who need it, is a better and more sustainable system than one where those who need it are obligated to spend themselves flat broke.
now for the big oil part
As it stands right now there are only a handful of oil companies competing to bring oil to the market exactly like
only a few companies offering healthcare.
we see the rising cost of both products and services reaching alarming proportions and both are squeezing americans like never before.
so people would you support a single payer big oil system? if not why sould you support a single healthcare option.
Actually yes, if what you're asking is would I support a nationalization of the United States' energy production industries. Absolutely I would support this. For exactly the reason you offered; private companies have a vested interest in reducing supply while increasing prices. They have the ability to bottleneck, and doing so gives them enormous profits; this gives them all the reason in the world to throttle supply against demand.
A nationalized system has no such incentive, as its obligation is not to the bottom line or profit. You may express doubt that such a system is obligated to the needs of the populace, but it's closer to the truth than saying it's obligated to profit.
there is no competition for either market more people competing to bring those goods and services to market would drastically reduce cost to us.
There already is no competition. It's a market defined by collusion and monopolization. When attatched to a profit motive, this is a killer situation.
I suppose an alternative to nationalization would be massive break-ups of the oil comoanies and higher regulations that prevent them from buying each other up again. Thirty companies would probably compete better than four, and that might work out. But curently, I think nationalization would be the better ticket.
the insanity in this country must stop.
I agree, the sooner we stop this insane drive towards privatization of everything under hte sun, the better.
thoughts? and please people its not the greed of big insurance its the greed of big goverment control that has created this situtation big government has squeezed the little guy out of both areas.
You really shouldn't talk about stuff you know nothing about.
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by neo96
I'm with you on Michael Moore. He is a neo progressive who struck it rich while promoting Cuban Communism. Disgustingly hypocritical. Not to mention that only the wealthy cronies and tourists in Cuba go to the nice hospitals, while the ordinary folk have to bring their own linens to clinics with the most filthy, degrading conditions. I read in the last couple years that Cuba had a problem with a toilet paper shortage. No toilet paper on the shelves. This is the cadillac health care Moore pretends doesn't exist. It wasn't in his film.edit on 10-6-2011 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by lifeissacred
reply to post by armtx
Because the government don't run it. They just pay for it. The doctors are the same, the nurses are the same, the medicines and the treatments are the same. The only difference is they're payed via taxes instead of straight out of your pocket.
Originally posted by armtx
reply to post by Janky Red
I want to agree with you on this one, but it gets down to the simple fact that we all die, we all get sick and until big pharm and medical professionals step up to the plate and start curing people for the sake of humanity and just not keep them alive, this will never change my mind that Americans, have a sense of entitlement on healthcare.
At the end of the day, people abuse their bodies with the garbage they put in it and expect ME, the taxpayer to take care of them after they spent decades doing the wrong thing.
Originally posted by Janky Red
Originally posted by armtx
reply to post by Janky Red
I want to agree with you on this one, but it gets down to the simple fact that we all die, we all get sick and until big pharm and medical professionals step up to the plate and start curing people for the sake of humanity and just not keep them alive, this will never change my mind that Americans, have a sense of entitlement on healthcare.
At the end of the day, people abuse their bodies with the garbage they put in it and expect ME, the taxpayer to take care of them after they spent decades doing the wrong thing.
I know how think and feel, I really think it is wrong... We built this whole place to take control of our
eviroment,healthcare is a luxury becaue it is what we have been conditioned to think...Yes everyone
dies, I can't tell you how many people say this, I don't get it though, it is the poorest argument of
all social and political arguments. One could better apply the same standard to murder or even taxes
with just as much validity. If ALL americans are paying for it, you are completely included, think
about toilets in the public parks and roads they expect YOU to pay, but I doubt you would be here sit here
and type, "well, we all crap our pants sometimes". I am right on this, go to an emergency room at a county hospital and talk to those people, there is no way around the biology of humanity,just because everyone
dies, does not mean people should die due to money, that is a human imposition, not a real barrier.
edit on 10-6-2011 by Janky Red because: (no reason given)