It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by freakjive
reply to post by XxRagingxPandaxX
I wonder if he's already been killed in one of their recent bombings? This is just their way of not having to admit he was already targeted. It may sound far fetched to some, but warrants the notion to recognize it.
Originally posted by rstregooski
There's also a couple angles that we're in there because of Gadhafi's pursuit of changing the gold standard situation or something like that, I don't recall.
Originally posted by SpeachM1litant
reply to post by kro32
Care to elaborate on how Gaddafi, the man who has been one of America's best allies in the War on Terror
is a threat to the United States.
I must say I oppose any military action against him and any attempts to target him, which is illegal in accordance with international law.
Originally posted by kro32
About time..He's one of many we should be actively removing as he's a threat to the United States, or possible threat anyways.
Lockerbie, 20 years on: Behind the frame up of Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al Megrahi
Libyan Appeals Frame-up By U.S. & England For Lockerbie Bombing
Why Only Silence Over The Lockerbie Frame-up
But in 2003, a retired CIA officer gave a statement to the lawyers of a Libyan convicted and jailed for the bombing, admitting that evidence had been planted. This was later corroborated by the former Scottish police chief, who was a member of the Association of Chief Police Officers Scotland. The Zionist press had also been quick to blame Syria and Iran for Lockerbie; Israel is the prime beneficiary of conflict between the West and Islamic nations.
Originally posted by kro32
About time..He's one of many we should be actively removing as he's a threat to the United States, or possible threat anyways.
Originally posted by Vicky32
Originally posted by kro32
About time..He's one of many we should be actively removing as he's a threat to the United States, or possible threat anyways.
Give me a break! Your own law (supposedly) forbids assassinating the heads of state of other countries.
May you suffer the same calamity that you wish on others. Instant karma, man!
If your military kill Ghaddafi, may some other military kill Obama, and Bush! (You're all so racist, you'd celebrate Obama's death)
V
NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen said Wednesday it is time to start planning for what to do in Libya after Gadhafi's departure "because Gadhafi's reign of terror is coming to an end."
In statement broadcast on state media, Gadhafi vowed a day before that "we will not surrender," even as NATO airstrikes bombarded his compound in Tripoli.
NATO recently announced its decision to extend its mission in Libya by 90 days.
Originally posted by kro32
anywhere in the world we have even the slightest interest we should be camping on their doorstep. I know alot of people would rather we bury our heads in the sand and just hope that whatever the world does works out for the best for us but history shows that when America has followed an isolationist approach that the world has gone to hell in a handbasket.
He is a mass murderer. I'm not sure I can see a reason to object. I