It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Sarah Palin Film to get Nationwide Release

page: 2
4
<< 1    3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 10 2011 @ 10:46 AM
link   

Originally posted by beezzer

Originally posted by lifeissacred
There's a strange cult of personality around that woman, all the more dangerous if she actually runs for president.


Funny. I've written the identical thing about Obama.

___________________________________________________________________________

To everyone else.

Don't like Palin?
Don't vote for her!


---------------------------
They will be voting for her as the U.S. economy goes off a cliff.
When the unemployment rate hits 11% Obama might just resign.
----------------------
America tried on a socialist suit and it did not fit.

The American people will demand change.
- Capitalism -




posted on Jun, 10 2011 @ 10:48 AM
link   
reply to post by beezzer
 


LOL It's interesting you should say that, Beezer, my friend. I have said the same thing all along.

A thread of mine from 3 years ago:

Sarah Palin is the GOP's Obama


Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
So, the GOP decided they needed an "Obama" of their very own and they hand-picked Sarah Palin! She's exciting, unifying, somewhat intelligent and motivating! She's inspiring, fantastic, and gives a GREAT speech!

"She's their Goddess", her critics say. "She's without experience or real substance"... but man! She can get the Republicans excited!


Now, I hope the Obama Bashers can understand what people see in Obama. It's the EXACT SAME THING!!!

You LOVE her and that's OK. You relate to her. But she's no savior. She's a politician. Just as Obama is a politician.



posted on Jun, 10 2011 @ 10:58 AM
link   
reply to post by Benevolent Heretic
 


Ouch! Zing-Pow!
Well done.
While their level of experience may be the same, their fan base attached with the same fervor, Palin espouses capitalism with the same level of attention that Obama does with Keynesian/social justice/economics.

So, hopefully there is a difference. But really, nice riposte'.



posted on Jun, 10 2011 @ 11:24 AM
link   
reply to post by Eurisko2012
 


Obama is not stupid. He has to know that what he is doing will ruin our country. If he doesn't know, then he really is that dumb.

Evil or stupid.

Obamas' campaign slogan for 2012.



posted on Jun, 10 2011 @ 11:24 AM
link   
reply to post by beezzer
 


Well, they got the movie website up and running.
It looks like they spent $1 million making this documentary.

- America Has A New Rising Star -
National Review got an early screening.
The movie needs a few bleeps added over all the F bombs dropped by the foul mouthed
liberals. The producers are looking for a PG-13 rating.



posted on Jun, 10 2011 @ 11:26 AM
link   
reply to post by Eurisko2012
 


Obama had actually done alot to repair America's reputation abroad, especially in Europe. He tried to offer alternatives to the US's ailing healthcare system which was looked at as a sign of progress by Europeans since we're used to having a decent healthcare system.

Also, his defeat of the previous regime was welcomed throughout the world as America rolling back it's imperialist adventures. Though Obama is a let down on both of the issues I previously mentioned, Palin in office would actually be a set back as she'll be viewed by most of the world as 'Bush part 2'. If you're looking for someone to do maximum good for the USA and the world then you should be supporting Ron Paul, not Palin.



posted on Jun, 10 2011 @ 11:32 AM
link   
reply to post by lifeissacred
 


President Sarah Palin or bust!
-------------------
Ron Paul can't win.
He reminds me of a Ross Perot on '___'.
------------------
All we need now is a great V.P. for Sarah.



posted on Jun, 10 2011 @ 11:54 AM
link   
Ive said it before.. when Palin first came on the scene.. being a woman I was pretty happy
I started looking at old youtubes and video of her previous to running with McCain and being in the spotlight. She was sharp, professional, and seemed a pretty good pick. Then I saw her more and more in the debates, interviews, campaigning, and etc.. her whole persona was different right down to her mannerisms while running with McCain. She went from competent and professional to winky, blinky, and had this "down home aww shucks" fake affect that was disgusting. How can one turn from her true self in previous video to this whole new " say it aint so joe" and "joe sixpack" persona? WHY would she? I dont tend to trust fakes and this woman has taken her supporters who didnt bother to watch her previous stuff and compare it to her current persona for a ride.

THAT is why I do not support her nor do I even consider her a viable candidate. I dont think she even believes what she is spouting these days and is simply pandering to a disgusted American public to get consideration or a vote. If she had stuck to her original and true personality, sure.. Id have considered her. This flip-flop fakeness is pretty damning IMO. In fact, I can go the rest of my life not hearing the term "joe sixpack" again...



posted on Jun, 10 2011 @ 12:04 PM
link   
reply to post by Advantage
 


Shouldn't her stance on specific issues count more towards her electability than whether she looks/sounds consistant on Youtube?



posted on Jun, 10 2011 @ 12:11 PM
link   
reply to post by Advantage
 


Maybe you will change your mind after you see the 2 hour long documentary about her.
--------------------
With the economy in bad shape and getting worse - Look at the DJIA today - there will
be a HUGE protest vote against Obama and George Soros.
His economic plan has failed miserably. It's over.
Blaming Bush won't work anymore.
-------------------------------
Do you hear Obama articulating solutions to this economic mess??? No.

He did however start up just another job training program.
The federal government already has 30 of them. Now we have 31.

This academic in the White House is in way over his head.



posted on Jun, 10 2011 @ 12:15 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jun, 10 2011 @ 12:25 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jun, 10 2011 @ 12:26 PM
link   
The Undefeated...

Is the title supposed to be ironic?

I mean, wouldn't the 2008 election be chalked up as a defeat? How about her dipping out on her constituents in Alaska? Jury's still out on that one I guess?



posted on Jun, 10 2011 @ 12:30 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jun, 10 2011 @ 12:31 PM
link   

Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by Advantage
 


Shouldn't her stance on specific issues count more towards her electability than whether she looks/sounds consistant on Youtube?


Thats exactly what the youtubes were concerning. I thought that would be clear.. consistent in her professionalism and stance. These werent back yard BBQ youtubes, but how she conducted herself and the stance she took in her career. She changed drastically and I guess you havent sought them out to view either.



posted on Jun, 10 2011 @ 12:31 PM
link   
reply to post by drwizardphd
 


They tried "The Quitter who Lied too Much" but it was rejected in demographic studies.



posted on Jun, 10 2011 @ 12:34 PM
link   

Originally posted by Eurisko2012
post removed by staff


LOL!! Think what you wish, but consider not making little assumptions about others you do not know just because they disagree with who you are so enthralled with. I WANTED to support Palin, but she fell short with her flip flopping. How you can turn that into jealousy must be a man thing.

edit on Fri Jun 10 2011 by DontTreadOnMe because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 10 2011 @ 12:38 PM
link   
reply to post by Advantage
 


Maybe you will change your mind after the first presidential debate.
There is a good reason why the media goes to DefCon 1 whenever Gov. Sarah Palin
is on the move. She is compelling.
The other candidates are not compelling.



posted on Jun, 10 2011 @ 12:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by Advantage

Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by Advantage
 


Shouldn't her stance on specific issues count more towards her electability than whether she looks/sounds consistant on Youtube?


Thats exactly what the youtubes were concerning. I thought that would be clear.. consistent in her professionalism and stance. These werent back yard BBQ youtubes, but how she conducted herself and the stance she took in her career. She changed drastically and I guess you havent sought them out to view either.


To be honest, I haven't watched her Youtube vids. I read her opinions on tax reform, domestic oil production, and economic recovery. The vids, the interviews are always slanted one way or another. So I eschew them all.

Same with Obama, though. WHAT he says is much more important than HOW he is saying it.




top topics



 
4
<< 1    3  4 >>

log in

join