It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Court: Dad can paste daughter's face on porn photo

page: 37
39
<< 34  35  36    38  39  40 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 11 2011 @ 01:03 PM
link   
My daughter is the tallest in the class of girls. She's taller than most boys. She'll probably always be taller.

She's also amoungst the least mature. A factor I'm sure that some men of a lesser caliber would ignore because they are merely looking for an EXCUSE to make their desires okay. And any EXCUSE will do.
edit on 2011/6/11 by Aeons because: (no reason given)




posted on Jun, 11 2011 @ 01:33 PM
link   
reply to post by Aeons
 





Teenage girls are more likely to DIE from childbirth, to suffer from all sorts of pregnancy related medical issues such as HELPP and preeclampsia. Their babies are more likely to die in childbirth, as are the teenage girls giving birth. Their vaginal canal is more likely to sustain maiming damage.


This does not change the fact that when secondary sexual traits are developed, normal healthy men can find them attractive, even at 13 years old. It is a simple biological fact. Nature does not wait till 18.



posted on Jun, 11 2011 @ 01:42 PM
link   
I would think we all should be asking is why a father superimposed his daughters face to sexy photographs, also why he gave her drugs and asked her to undress.

This isn't about a man getting off on seeing a young girl, this is a father who obviously sees his daughter in a sexual conatation.

If someone has a thing about older women would they paste a picture of their mothers head to a young womans photo which was sexually graphic? No different exept the roles are reversed.

There is imho no excuse for a man who obviously sees his daughter as a sexual object.



posted on Jun, 11 2011 @ 01:54 PM
link   

Originally posted by Aeons
"Reproductively Mature?" Like the non-menstruating models mentioned earlier as an example.

You're harping this point thinking that it is the weak spot on people with normal human morality about this issue. It isn't. This is just people hoping that screaming over and over "but she's got boobies" will sow confusion.


If you want to turn a blind eye to reality that's fine with me, fact remains that there is nothing unnatural, perverted etc. etc. about a man being attracted to a reproductively mature female (or for a woman to be attracted to a reproductively mature male).


Originally posted by Aeons
Teenage girls are more likely to DIE from childbirth, to suffer from all sorts of pregnancy related medical issues such as HELPP and preeclampsia. Their babies are more likely to die in childbirth, as are the teenage girls giving birth. Their vaginal canal is more likely to sustain maiming damage.


You're completely missing the point. I'm not arguing that in this day and age it's a good idea for very young women to get pregnant (even if they're reproductively mature). I'm saying that it's natural for people to be sexually attracted to reproductively mature members of the opposite gender.

edit on 11-6-2011 by SevenBeans because: (no reason given)

edit on 11-6-2011 by SevenBeans because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 11 2011 @ 01:59 PM
link   

Originally posted by Morningglory
Your example of "A" girl who is the tallest in the class shows growth rates differ considerably. Playing it safe and leaving pregnancy to full grown women is what's best for modern women.


I agree, my very simple point obviously went way over head.


Originally posted by Morningglory
My great-grandmother died in childbirth at 28 with her 5th child. This was around 1912. My great-grandfather lived until the ripe old age of 84. Modern women are living longer partly because of better medical care during pregnancy. I read somewhere pregnancy is the most dangerous time even for a fully mature woman. So many unforeseen things can happen.


And? See above.



posted on Jun, 11 2011 @ 03:49 PM
link   

Originally posted by savannah

Originally posted by Partygirl
How can the court system let this go unpunished?


It isn't illegal to have photographs of younger girls faces, and it isn't illegal to have photographs of an adult women's body. Placing both side-by-side makes him a bit of a freak but he hasn't done anything illegal. If you Photoshop your car driving 70 mph into a picture of school crossing full of kids would that be illegal? Now if you want to talk about someone being creepy that's a different story. Yes, this guy is a creep but he's not a criminal.

To everyone else, please stop calling men pedophiles when they like high school age girls. These girls are old enough to get pregnant. We even have popular television shows that celebrate this. (16 and pregnant) That is illegal and wrong but not pedophilia. You're minimizing the sickness of true pedophiles who like little kids.


I emphasized this bit. Where are they saying it's equal to actual sexual abuse (as in actually doing sex acts)? And wanting this punished does not automatically imply that they would want actual sexual abuse to be punished less. Logic?



posted on Jun, 11 2011 @ 03:59 PM
link   
reply to post by Partygirl
 


Sadly, as the law was structured, he didn't actually break it and the Judge was right. But! I think the Judge should have referred him to family services and sent him for evaluation. Before any harm is done to his daughter or any other teen he fantasizes about.

And maybe CA. (and everywhere else) need to look into those laws a little more. A restructuring may be in order, at least to the extent that if someone like that dad shows intent, they can be removed from potentially harming the children and at least be evaluated as to whether there is any real potential intent.



posted on Jun, 11 2011 @ 04:00 PM
link   

Originally posted by incrediblelousminds

Originally posted by boondock-saint


A 14 yr old boy jerking off is just the same
as a 40 yr old man, both have carnal knowledge
and the knowledge of right and wrong.
So both are equally guilty.




Umm, what? It sure sounds like you are grasping at straws to defend a 40 year old man wantin to engage in sex with a minor.

What's on your computer, BS?


What makes you think he's "defending" them? He talks about "God's law" and how this is "WRONG" under that law. Is that "defense"? Doesn't sound like it.

And if he's arguing it's not "illegal" as in infringing against governmental law, there's others that would argue the same. Is this also a "defense"? If so, then I suppose that the "defending" in and of itself is not bad to you, so what is?


Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by felonius
Personally, a family member should take this sucker and feed him to the hogs.


when you were 14 yrs old and jerked off in your
bed at night to the thoughts of your 13 yr old
girlfriend or a hot girl at school, were you not
committing the same offense?
Your 13 yr old gf was underage.
Should somebody have fed you to the
hogs then ???


Again, just, wow.


between birth and present day,
about 99% of us have committed
this very same act. Yet some
stand up high and mighty and have
a holier than thou attitude.


I hope they dont come look at your computer.

He was referring to fantasizing about one's young close ones, NOT making pictures on a computer. "between birth and present day, about 99% of us have committed this very same act.", MEANING: "jerked off in your bed at night to the thoughts of your 13 yr old girlfriend or a hot girl at school".



posted on Jun, 11 2011 @ 04:29 PM
link   
I find it sick,disgusting,and perverse to stick a photo of "YOUR" child's head on a porn photo. This father should have his children taken away,before his sick "fantasy's" end up costing his,or someone elses child their innocence.IMHO This is sick.



posted on Jun, 11 2011 @ 05:17 PM
link   

Originally posted by dizzylizzy
I would think we all should be asking is why a father superimposed his daughters face to sexy photographs, also why he gave her drugs and asked her to undress.

This isn't about a man getting off on seeing a young girl, this is a father who obviously sees his daughter in a sexual conatation.

If someone has a thing about older women would they paste a picture of their mothers head to a young womans photo which was sexually graphic? No different exept the roles are reversed.

There is imho no excuse for a man who obviously sees his daughter as a sexual object.


I actually posted about this exact situation being exploited via TV (Malcolm in the Middle), where they had a scene showing the oldest boy cutting and pasting his MOTHERS face, onto a NUDE Playboy image!!!

Don't forget to include the TV/MOVIE/MUSIC/FASHION industries, for the lowering of standards & morality.



posted on Jun, 11 2011 @ 05:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by Maslo
reply to post by Aeons
 





Teenage girls are more likely to DIE from childbirth, to suffer from all sorts of pregnancy related medical issues such as HELPP and preeclampsia. Their babies are more likely to die in childbirth, as are the teenage girls giving birth. Their vaginal canal is more likely to sustain maiming damage.


This does not change the fact that when secondary sexual traits are developed, normal healthy men can find them attractive, even at 13 years old. It is a simple biological fact. Nature does not wait till 18.


That's why age of consent laws exist; to protect pubescent children from predatory adults. Those who choose to ignore these laws respond only to the unevolved natural law that the standing penis has no conscience.
edit on 11/6/2011 by teapot because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 11 2011 @ 06:58 PM
link   
reply to post by badw0lf
 


Your correct, he didn't break the law and should be re-sentenced for other crimes (Like giving her drugs, etc.). But everyone here and there know what his intent was, hell he tried to get her to pose in her underwear for pictures. Because the morphed head of his daughter on the bodies of the porn stars weren't cutting it anymore. So he needed real pics of her in sexy wear and in her underwear. Eventually this guy was going to sexually molest this girl if he hadn't already during their drug binges (trust me her being knocked out from the pot he could have easily have felt her up and/or masturbated close to her).



posted on Jun, 11 2011 @ 08:15 PM
link   

Originally posted by Maslo
reply to post by Aeons
 





Teenage girls are more likely to DIE from childbirth, to suffer from all sorts of pregnancy related medical issues such as HELPP and preeclampsia. Their babies are more likely to die in childbirth, as are the teenage girls giving birth. Their vaginal canal is more likely to sustain maiming damage.


This does not change the fact that when secondary sexual traits are developed, normal healthy men can find them attractive, even at 13 years old. It is a simple biological fact. Nature does not wait till 18.


So normal healthy men don't care if they frack little girls to death. And that's "natural."

Fascinating. Can you illuminate me further on natural normal males?



posted on Jun, 11 2011 @ 09:09 PM
link   
reply to post by Aeons
 


Sounds like you have some impulse issues of you run up and start humping any person you are attracted to.



posted on Jun, 12 2011 @ 03:26 AM
link   
reply to post by Aeons
 


Sure. Normal natural men dont screw without consent of the other party, that is another important variable needed besides sexual attraction. In most of developed world, 13 year olds are considered incapable of giving informed consent.



posted on Jun, 12 2011 @ 05:29 AM
link   
i firmly believe that if religion was still in everybody's fear, sick and twisted inhumane acts such as this would not be happening.

it absolutely sickens me to death, not only is this child pornography, which it is, it is also inscest



posted on Jun, 12 2011 @ 05:31 AM
link   

Originally posted by hoghead cheese
reply to post by badw0lf
 


Your correct, he didn't break the law and should be re-sentenced for other crimes (Like giving her drugs, etc.). But everyone here and there know what his intent was, hell he tried to get her to pose in her underwear for pictures. Because the morphed head of his daughter on the bodies of the porn stars weren't cutting it anymore. So he needed real pics of her in sexy wear and in her underwear. Eventually this guy was going to sexually molest this girl if he hadn't already during their drug binges (trust me her being knocked out from the pot he could have easily have felt her up and/or masturbated close to her).


its against morals and is very disturbing, he should definitely be sentenced to a mental asylum IMO



posted on Jun, 12 2011 @ 05:32 AM
link   

Originally posted by sonnny1
I find it sick,disgusting,and perverse to stick a photo of "YOUR" child's head on a porn photo. This father should have his children taken away,before his sick "fantasy's" end up costing his,or someone elses child their innocence.IMHO This is sick.


And you have the right to think so, as long as you don't take action upon your opinions.

Just as this father does not have the right to impose his sexual fantasies on his daughter, you do not have the right to impose your moral values on him.

There are people out there who think homosexuality is sick, disgusting and perverse. Like you, they find little understanding and have no tolerance for (sexual) deviances, suppression is the evident way for them to deal with it.

Turn the clock back a century or more, and these people were in power in the western world, forcing their 'moral' norms on anything deviant. A homosexual would end up in prison, if he was caught. We've come from far to create a more humane society in which we can tolerate deviances, as long as these deviances do not force themselves upon others.


Originally posted by ShadowZion
i firmly believe that if religion was still in everybody's fear, sick and twisted inhumane acts such as this would not be happening.


Right! Remember Deuteronomy 22:23-24:

If a man happens to meet in a town a virgin pledged to be married and he sleeps with her,
you shall take both of them to the gate of that town and stone them to death—the young woman because she was in a town and did not scream for help, and the man because he violated another man’s wife. You must purge the evil from among you.


Capital punishment for all you adulterers out there! There will be a loot of people on death row...


edit on 12-6-2011 by Heliocentric because: Falling to the ground, I watch a leaf settle down In a bed of brown.



posted on Jun, 12 2011 @ 05:33 AM
link   
The state I live in, the law states that even if the girl appears underage, IE in a catholic schoolgirl outfit with pigtails, etc to make them look underage, they can still be convicted of child porn. On another note, I think the father needs some serious help.



posted on Jun, 12 2011 @ 05:42 AM
link   

Originally posted by Heliocentric

Originally posted by sonnny1
I find it sick,disgusting,and perverse to stick a photo of "YOUR" child's head on a porn photo. This father should have his children taken away,before his sick "fantasy's" end up costing his,or someone elses child their innocence.IMHO This is sick.


And you have the right to think so, as long as you don't take action upon your opinions.

But, just as this father does not have the right to impose his sexual fantasies on his daughter, you do not have the right to impose your moral values on him.

There are people out there who think homosexuality is sick, disgusting and perverse. Like you, they find little understanding and have no tolerance for (sexual) deviances, suppression is the evident way for them to deal with it.

Turn the clock back a century or more, and these people were in power in the western world, forcing their 'moral' norms on anything deviant. A homosexual would end up in prison, if he was caught. We've come from far to create a more humane society in which we can tolerate deviances, as long as these deviances do not force themselves upon others.


Originally posted by ShadowZion
i firmly believe that if religion was still in everybody's fear, sick and twisted inhumane acts such as this would not be happening.


Right! Remember Deuteronomy 22:23-24:

If a man happens to meet in a town a virgin pledged to be married and he sleeps with her,
you shall take both of them to the gate of that town and stone them to death—the young woman because she was in a town and did not scream for help, and the man because he violated another man’s wife. You must purge the evil from among you.


Capital punishment for all you adulterers out there! There will be a loot of people on death row...



edit on 12-6-2011 by Heliocentric because: Falling to the ground, I watch a leaf settle down In a bed of brown.



he should definitely have his child taken away from before this CRIMINAL takes it a step further. This is pedophilia. This is wrong! this is not correct!

I believe in religion and i do believe that you should not sleep with another mans wife, it is demoralizing for the mans family and the women's family, not to mention the emotional pain that the wife's husband could undergo and vice versa if the situation was turned around, but in this day and age we dont care because we have lost our way.

I have had two of my ex's cheat on me and not once will i do it to someone else, because i can honestly say that i loved them and the pain they caused me, i would not be able to live, knowing that i caused the same pain to someone else.

im not saying we go back to barbaric times, but we understand right from wrong and only do the right thing.

we can no longer act like children in this place, we need to understand right from wrong now, so that our children do the same.

I dont want my son to cheat on his girlfriend when he is born, or my daughter etc..... even though they dont exist yet, i will make sure that they grow up in a uplifting environment where nothing can bring them down.

Down with the NWO

actually a barbaric attitude towards the pedophiles would suffice in my books, but not to the victims.


edit on 12-6-2011 by ShadowZion because: add on

edit on 12-6-2011 by ShadowZion because: (no reason given)

edit on 12-6-2011 by ShadowZion because: actually



new topics

top topics



 
39
<< 34  35  36    38  39  40 >>

log in

join