It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Court: Dad can paste daughter's face on porn photo

page: 32
39
<< 29  30  31    33  34  35 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 10 2011 @ 11:43 AM
link   
reply to post by SyphonX
 


It has been stated several times that being attracted to a child that looks developed is "natural".. I call BS. period!




posted on Jun, 10 2011 @ 11:44 AM
link   
reply to post by TKDRL
 


Prove it!

Just because you typed 11yr old girl in google images, DOES NOT mean that is an 11 yr old.
edit on 6/10/2011 by ShaunHatfield because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 10 2011 @ 11:44 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jun, 10 2011 @ 11:44 AM
link   

Originally posted by ShaunHatfield


I will also add... If by chance that is an 11yr old,


Don't worry dude your eyes didn't let you down, she was 17, just more slop from the pro paedo fraternity.



posted on Jun, 10 2011 @ 11:46 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jun, 10 2011 @ 11:48 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jun, 10 2011 @ 11:48 AM
link   
reply to post by ShaunHatfield
 


Actually I typed 13 as that was the comparison, and I found out it was wrong. Google failed me in that case.

Interestingly enough a guy was almost jailed for having a video of that porn star, saying it was child porn.
edit on Fri, 10 Jun 2011 11:57:11 -0500 by TKDRL because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 10 2011 @ 11:48 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jun, 10 2011 @ 11:50 AM
link   

Originally posted by Aeons
How many people annoyed with these guys also notice these are often the same posters complaining about how men got it tough, that feminism is killing them, that they shouldn't ever be responsible to the babies they make, that child support is oppression.....

Isn't it an interesting coincidence - that people who don't like women, complain about feminism, and don't see why they should support any children they have ALSO support crap like this?

I hope that one day these guys stop being the face of the fathers' / mens' rights groups, and the guys with some substance take it over. These wackadoodles make out all the time that they speak for all men, and there are too many people who believe it.

THIS is really what they are. Immature brats lacking normal social boundaries, and aggressively promoting that this is correct human behaviour.


This is the biggest collection of ad hominem attacking that I've ever seen someone over the age of 14 whip up. I can see why you would go there, though, since you have had no legitimate argument about the actual topic for the entirety of this thread. Yet here you are, trying to polarize it whilst completely ignoring all of the good points. I wonder if maybe YOU are just the problem, and not everyone else in all areas of every thread?
edit on 10-6-2011 by TheOrangeBrood because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 10 2011 @ 11:54 AM
link   

Originally posted by SyphonX

Originally posted by Thepreye

Originally posted by SyphonX
reply to post by Thepreye
 


Care to read it yourself? I'm not your personal servant, you made it this far, so apparently you can read.

He continually bragged about how he would kill the man in question "if he knew him or the victim".


Errrr you said he boasted of committing murder he didn't he said he would gladly do so and face the consequences if provoked by the right circumstances.

Just how thick are you dude? Can you comprehend what yourself and others write? Or was that just more misconstruing and dissembling paraphrasiology?]


Yes. That is what it's called when someone brags about killing someone. They are boasting about committing the act. In other words, prideful exaggeration about pledging to act.

Stop quoting me with your strawmen and semantics arguments, as I won't respond to it anymore.

This whole thread is an over-emotional cluster#, and I am out.
edit on 10-6-2011 by SyphonX because: (no reason given)


Is English your primary language I ask because you seem to have difficulty with tenses and anticipatory conjecture, if English is your first language I'll stick with my first call of hmm "special" or extra work on comprehension skills.



posted on Jun, 10 2011 @ 11:56 AM
link   

Originally posted by ShaunHatfield
It has been stated several times that being attracted to a child that looks developed is "natural".. I call BS. period!


Our sense of attraction generally directs us toward reproductively mature people of the opposite gender, not 18 year old plus people of the opposite gender. Nature doesn't care if it's a day before the 18th birthday or the day after.

So, age isn't a good guide when discussing what's natural and what isn't when it comes to attraction.

An attraction for a child (defined as pre-pubescent) is certainly unnatural, an attraction for a reproductively mature individual is generally perfectly natural.

Claiming that your attractions comply exactly with this arbitrary age is luaghable.

edit on 10-6-2011 by SevenBeans because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 10 2011 @ 11:56 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jun, 10 2011 @ 11:57 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jun, 10 2011 @ 11:58 AM
link   
the daughter should come back with defamation of character, and clearly the father wants to see her so he's screwed up and needs a 5 cent bullet in the head.



posted on Jun, 10 2011 @ 12:00 PM
link   
reply to post by SevenBeans
 


We arent talking 18...... I agree there are 18 yr old that look much older, and younger... We are talking roughly 13 or 14.. If you cant tell the difference between a 13 yr old and a 18 year old, you have problems.

I would also like to add, if confronted with a decision on whether or not she is 13, at that point it is a good idea to side with caution.... Isn't that what you would want a grown man to do, in reference to your 13 yr old daughter?



posted on Jun, 10 2011 @ 12:00 PM
link   
reply to post by TheOrangeBrood
 


Ad hominem would be if I were using these points to argue their points. I'm not.

I'm using these points to show the pattern of social boundaries which are often found together, which adddresses the underlying argument being presented - that these people believe this normal human behaviour. I am addressing the foundational argument, and showing the pattern of immature or sociopathic social boundaries of those with these views.


edit on 2011/6/10 by Aeons because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 10 2011 @ 12:00 PM
link   
Most 13 yr old males will have gained a bank of images in their heads to masturbate to. These images may include a 13 yr old female/friend, girlfriend,or older women, pop and screen idols. These images can become locked in the males fantasies and can carry on through adult hood. It becomes the makeup of what makes the males feelings with sex so intense. This is also true for males that have gay fantasies.
So the question is, when do you put away fantasies of young females and progress to other fantasies. The biological function of sex and masturbating has always included some form of imagery or even objects i.e shoes, silk, rubber. Each individual can have some erotic fantasy that improves their feelings during sex. Fantasies of young children is not new, it's not a modern phenomenon. But it's where you as an individual must make the decision on what morality you want to adhere to. Fantasies are mostly private and tailor made to your sexual height. For this father to include his daughter's face onto a picture with sexual content, suggests his fantasies had overstepped the boundaries of morality.
And shows what dangerous heights some will go to.

Dangerous morality, sexual deviancy or criminal act?



posted on Jun, 10 2011 @ 12:01 PM
link   
Imagine if the father had taken pictures of his daughter in the nude. Would this be child pornography or art? What would be considered nude, one nipple exposed? We as a society cannot seem to draw a line anywhere, so we leave it up to a judge. What the heck consitutes a "graphic" pose?



posted on Jun, 10 2011 @ 12:02 PM
link   
reply to post by Partygirl
 


Yikes. Come on Dad, wise up, at least wait until she's out of the house and fully 18 before you decide to indulge your sick fantasies by busting out the digital photo album alongside your porn collection. Obviously I agree that this isn't child porn, it's definitely creepy, but not illegal.



posted on Jun, 10 2011 @ 12:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by SevenBeans
An attraction for a child (defined as pre-pubescent) is certainly unnatural, an attraction for a reproductively mature individual is generally perfectly natural.


But, there's other factors involved, such as common sense and decency. Just because a 13 year old may be more physically developed than her peers, doesn't mean she deserves to be subjected to lecherous old bastards attention. She's still a child, and deserves a childhood learning the facts of life with boys her own age. Children want so bad to be grown up, so some of them jump at the chance to hang out with older men. Older men need to have the decency to understand that isn't what is best for them, but many don't give a sh!t about anybody but themselves.



new topics

top topics



 
39
<< 29  30  31    33  34  35 >>

log in

join