Court: Dad can paste daughter's face on porn photo

page: 3
39
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join

posted on Jun, 9 2011 @ 07:45 AM
link   

Originally posted by The_Phantom
Yeah, and in his mind he was having sex with his daughter.


IMO you would be correct


but thinking it and doing it
are 2 different things by
man made law.

By God's law they are the same.




posted on Jun, 9 2011 @ 07:46 AM
link   
post removed because the user has no concept of manners

Click here for more information.



posted on Jun, 9 2011 @ 07:47 AM
link   

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by Suspiria
So normal acts of growing up are akin to incestuously
bent simulated child porn?..okiedokie then.


correct !!!

while both men and women are having
orgasms their mind does not stop. It is
still constantly working just like when
you sleep. Those thoughts they have
of other people involved in that masturbation
sessions becomes objects of their lust.
This is why most people who are not really
into an actual sex session can just lay
there and not have orgasms. Your mind
has to aid the orgasm. And even some
folks can have orgasms without any
physical stimulation at all. A prime
example of this is when folks wake
up from a wet dream. It's all in the mind.
The mind makes it real. Thusly the
mind simulates the sexual act.



My mind usually wanders to what bills I have to pay the next day or wondering if I turned all the sockets off to be frank.



posted on Jun, 9 2011 @ 07:47 AM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 


Allright. But I was obviously talking about man-made laws, as does the article in original post.



posted on Jun, 9 2011 @ 07:49 AM
link   

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by Exuberant1
reply to post by boondock-saint
 

You are comparing thoughts from children in the the same grade with simulated childporn by an adult.
I think you need to rethink your strategy here.


In the Bible, Jesus left his home and started doing his
heavenly father's work when he was 12 yrs old.
Jewish Bar Mitzvahs usually occur around the
same age. This is around the age of knowledge.
So basically you are an adult in God's eyes
once you realize right from wrong. Mankind
only sets the standard for adulthood at 18.

A 14 yr old boy jerking off is just the same
as a 40 yr old man, both have carnal knowledge
and the knowledge of right and wrong.
So both are equally guilty.



So, lets forget man made law for a while. Are you saying that you think it is ok for you to have sex with a 14 year old girl, because, according to you, she has the same carnal knowledge as you?



posted on Jun, 9 2011 @ 07:49 AM
link   
He didn't break the law, the court did good here
Now the neighbourhood needs to kick his arse

This is the ideal scenario, however child protection services should intervene ASAP


Originally posted by boondock-saint
the Bible is the rule and guide
of my life. Everything else is
man made.

Dude the Bible is man made, then after it being man made other men edited it for decades



posted on Jun, 9 2011 @ 07:51 AM
link   
Did anyone actually read the article? The father got 13 years for possessing child pornography and supplying a minor with narcotics! He appealed and the appeal court agreed that photoshopping was not a crime. The father will be re-prosecuted. He attempted to coerse his daughter into posing in her underwear and she refused and told her mother.

The article did not state if the father had any actual child porn on his computer. If he did then he needs to be prosecuted for that as well as the supplying charge AND soliciting a child in the commission of a crime (child porn/drug use) as well as attempted coersion of a child to commit incest.

I hope the retrial leads to a longer sentence than the one he is currently serving.



posted on Jun, 9 2011 @ 07:54 AM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 


How is that the same thing? A 14 year old boy fantasizing about his 13 year old girlfriend is not the same as a GROWN MAN fantasizing about his 13 year old DAUGHTER. I bet he has molested kids before, because it wasn't just the pictures, but the fact that he actually attempted to get her to undress in "real life"....had she complied, he would have commited a crime because he most certainly would have tried to have sex with her.....that fact alone says he has probably done it before.
edit on 6/9/2011 by StealthyKat because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 9 2011 @ 07:56 AM
link   

Originally posted by incrediblelousminds
What's on your computer, BS?


I can guarantee you that there is no
child porn or no simulated child porn
or pasting of underage girls onto
adult women's bodies. This I can
guarantee


I am just explaining my point
of view here, nothing more.



posted on Jun, 9 2011 @ 07:56 AM
link   

Originally posted by incrediblelousminds
reply to post by boondock-saint
 


post removed by staff
No, he's actually bringing up some very important philosophical questions that get ignored all too often because of people like you who simply can't see any line in the sand between reality and fantasy. They are fantasies, why do they need to be justified? Are you saying we should punish people for their thoughts? PS- you should be banned for making such allegations, it's uncalled for.
edit on Thu Jun 9 2011 by DontTreadOnMe because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 9 2011 @ 07:57 AM
link   

Originally posted by boondock-saint


I am just explaining my point
of view here, nothing more.


right, your 'point of view' that there is nothing wrong with a 40 year old man thinking of a 13 year old girl while he masturbates.

edit on 9-6-2011 by incrediblelousminds because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 9 2011 @ 07:58 AM
link   
reply to post by henriquefd
 





So, lets forget man made law for a while. Are you saying that you think it is ok for you to have sex with a 14 year old girl, because, according to you, she has the same carnal knowledge as you?


It is actually considered OK in lots of developed countries in the world. Even in Brazil, listed as your location, age of consent is 14.



posted on Jun, 9 2011 @ 07:59 AM
link   
A pedophile is still a pedophile whether in thought or deed imho.



posted on Jun, 9 2011 @ 08:00 AM
link   
reply to post by ChaoticOrder
 


So you agree with BS that there is no difference between a 40 year old man lusting for a 13 year old girl and a 14 year old boy doing the same?

I find your perspective disturbingly close to justifying pedophilia.



posted on Jun, 9 2011 @ 08:03 AM
link   

Originally posted by incrediblelousminds
Right. And child pornography is a man made law.
Are you even TRYING to make sense?
Perhaps you should circle shadows and clal them tatoos?


i think you are misinterpreting.

Man and God view these acts differently.

God says that even thinking it is illegal.

Man's law does not, it has to be
put into action to become illegal.

why is this so hard to comprehend?

don't attack the messenger
I didn't write the Bible.

there are some things that God says is illegal
and man says it is not. An example of that
would be being gay. God says it is illegal,
man says it is not.



posted on Jun, 9 2011 @ 08:04 AM
link   
reply to post by StealthyKat
 




How is that the same thing? A 14 year old boy fantasizing about his 13 year old girlfriend is not the same as a GROWN MAN fantasizing about his 13 year old DAUGHTER.
lol...what if it was just any 14 year old girl, and not his daughter? Is he allowed to fantasize about other 14 year old girls according to your highness? Or is just guys under 18? Or under 16 perhaps? Or just guys the same age can fantasize about girls their same age?
I had a really cute girlfriend when I was 15 (she was the same age), and even to this day I still think she was cute. I used to fantasize about her too, even to this day I...oh, I better stop there, I'm 18 now, I can only fantasize about girls over 18 aye, that's about right isn't it, according to your rule set?


+1 more 
posted on Jun, 9 2011 @ 08:05 AM
link   

Originally posted by Partygirl
How can the court system let this go unpunished?


It isn't illegal to have photographs of younger girls faces, and it isn't illegal to have photographs of an adult women's body. Placing both side-by-side makes him a bit of a freak but he hasn't done anything illegal. If you Photoshop your car driving 70 mph into a picture of school crossing full of kids would that be illegal? Now if you want to talk about someone being creepy that's a different story. Yes, this guy is a creep but he's not a criminal.

To everyone else, please stop calling men pedophiles when they like high school age girls. These girls are old enough to get pregnant. We even have popular television shows that celebrate this. (16 and pregnant) That is illegal and wrong but not pedophilia. You're minimizing the sickness of true pedophiles who like little kids.



posted on Jun, 9 2011 @ 08:05 AM
link   

Originally posted by incrediblelousminds
reply to post by ChaoticOrder
 


So you agree with BS that there is no difference between a 40 year old man lusting for a 13 year old girl and a 14 year old boy doing the same?

I find your perspective disturbingly close to justifying pedophilia.


Pedophilia is attraction to prepubescent children. 13 year old girl may be already physically well developed, and it is thus not always abnormal to be attracted to such girls.



posted on Jun, 9 2011 @ 08:06 AM
link   

Originally posted by Maslo
reply to post by henriquefd
 





So, lets forget man made law for a while. Are you saying that you think it is ok for you to have sex with a 14 year old girl, because, according to you, she has the same carnal knowledge as you?


It is actually considered OK in lots of developed countries in the world. Even in Brazil, listed as your location, age of consent is 14.
AHAHAHA. High five! Ultra smooth post sir.



posted on Jun, 9 2011 @ 08:06 AM
link   
post removed because the user has no concept of manners

Click here for more information.





top topics
 
39
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join