It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
kinda makes you wonder how much of the psycological harm was caused by the over reaching legal system that and with the coverage of it the poor kid will probably have a hard time in school areosmith might make a comeback man that song got over played back then poor kid
Originally posted by Maslo
reply to post by Thepreye
Psychological harm is often more injurious to an individual than none lethal physical harm, I really don't get why anyone would express sympathy for the devil in open forum.
But masturbating to these pictures in private does not cause psychological harm to anyone.
Originally posted by SickOfLies
reply to post by TKDRL
The point is no matter how you twist it, this sicko is wanking over his 13 year old daughter otherwise he would have left the picture how it was. Im finished with this i find it disgusting people are trying to justify this or saying that there is nothing wrong. This guy is a father he is there to protect his daughter and to love her as a father should and that doesnt involve jacking off over her face which is what he did or like i said he would've left the picture how it was. Say what you want but its wrong and one day when he does take it to the next level he will get what he deserves, jail time and alot of blokes showing him first hand just how it feels only this time he'll be on the recieving end. anyway like i said thats all i've got to say.
Originally posted by boondock-saint
Originally posted by felonius
Personally, a family member should take this sucker and feed him to the hogs.
when you were 14 yrs old and jerked off in your
bed at night to the thoughts of your 13 yr old
girlfriend or a hot girl at school, were you not
committing the same offense?
Your 13 yr old gf was underage.
Should somebody have fed you to the
hogs then ???
between birth and present day,
about 99% of us have committed
this very same act. Yet some
stand up high and mighty and have
a holier than thou attitude.
Originally posted by SickOfLies
13yrs old and his an adult = pedo or soon to be pedo. its his daughter = incest or wishes/soon to be incest.
is the law supposed to wait till he has enough of just a face and goes for the real thing and destroys not only some poor kids life but that kids familys life and his familys life as well???
Originally posted by Heliocentric
Originally posted by beltemps
should he be punished? I don't know... further prosecution means more publicity and wife and girl don't deserve this...
So we don't prosecute people in order to spare innocent family members from suffering?
The only snag here is, there's nothing to prosecute. No crime has been committed. Whatever people are revolted about happened inside this person's head.edit on 10-6-2011 by Heliocentric because: so very still, even cherry blossoms are not stirred by the temple bell
Originally posted by Thepreye fantasy should be a crime
Originally posted by Maslo
reply to post by Thepreye
Psychological harm is often more injurious to an individual than none lethal physical harm, I really don't get why anyone would express sympathy for the devil in open forum.
But masturbating to these pictures in private does not cause psychological harm to anyone.
Originally posted by Thepreye
Err as was always likely the masturbation has been exposed thus opening the psychological Pandora's box for the entire family, what is so hard about grasping the shear wrongness of this situation.
Originally posted by SevenBeans
Originally posted by Thepreye
Err as was always likely the masturbation has been exposed thus opening the psychological Pandora's box for the entire family, what is so hard about grasping the shear wrongness of this situation.
Who was responsible for exposing it?
I am just disturbed all the way around by this thread. Or maybe shocked is the better word. So many people think that creating x rated pictures of a child (or even your own child) is fine.
Originally posted by Thepreye
If you wana play tennis who was responsible for making the disgusting image in the first place.
Originally posted by TKDRL
Who gets to decide? [
Originally posted by Abney
Of COURSE Boondock is not seeing anything wrong here.
Why am I not surprised?
Originally posted by SevenBeans
Originally posted by Thepreye
If you wana play tennis who was responsible for making the disgusting image in the first place.
Facts are facts, not tennis.
Creating the images didn't cause harm, exposing them did.
Originally posted by Thepreye
Come on poster! what was there to be exposed until the weirdo made the image.