It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SevenBeans
It's amazing the number of things that people think about, fantasize about etc. etc. that they would never dream of actually doing in a million years.
The photoshopping was a depiction of fantasy. I expect if we got to see depictions of your phantasies you'd be pretty damn embarassed and not so quick to judge people simply based on such things.
Originally posted by ThousandIslandSunny
reply to post by Heliocentric
You cant help child molesters.
Originally posted by aero56
Really? You don't see how this could affect her "pursuit of happiness"?
Originally posted by SevenBeans
Originally posted by aero56
Really? You don't see how this could affect her "pursuit of happiness"?
I don't either, please explain...
Someone pasting my head onto a pornographic picture and masturbating to it in the privacy of their own home doesn't effect me at all.
Originally posted by beltemps
should he be punished? I don't know... further prosecution means more publicity and wife and girl don't deserve this...
Originally posted by Thepreye
You don't know how the knowledge of what her dad did will hurt her?? I think you might be one bean short of the seven.
Originally posted by SevenBeans
Originally posted by Thepreye
You don't know how the knowledge of what her dad did will hurt her?? I think you might be one bean short of the seven.
Good grief...
You understand that many of the comments are referring specifically to the act of portraying the fantasy, and whether that in and of itself harms anyone and should be considered a crime?
Originally posted by Heliocentric
Originally posted by ThousandIslandSunny
reply to post by Heliocentric
You cant help child molesters.
Why not?
And we're actually not talking about a child molester, we're talking about a guy who jerked off at a photo.
May the one person in this thread who has never jerked off at a photo throw the first stone!
Psychological harm is often more injurious to an individual than none lethal physical harm, I really don't get why anyone would express sympathy for the devil in open forum.
not to mention that the simpsons kids are well over legal age by now if they really wanted to stick it to the guy tho he should have been tried for modifying a copyrighted image ( from the porn) etc . atleast they might have had a better chance of that sticking not sure how well the mental abuse case would hold up
Originally posted by ChaoticOrder
reply to post by Suspiria
Then he should have been charged with something closer to that, not child pornography, because it isn't. And most certainly, the guy with Simpsons porn did not have child ornography, because the Simpsons are a fictional family. They don't have a real *likeness*.
That girls *likeness* was not used. Her actual FACE was used and superimposed onto photo's. That is a degrading act performed on an unsuspecting girl.
Originally posted by SickOfLies
The point is no matter how you twist it, this sicko is wanking over his 13 year old daughter otherwise he would have left the picture how it was. Im finished with this i find it disgusting people are trying to justify this or saying that there is nothing wrong.
Originally posted by SickOfLies
This guy is a father he is there to protect his daughter and to love her as a father should and that doesnt involve jacking off over her face which is what he did or like i said he would've left the picture how it was. Say what you want but its wrong and one day when he does take it to the next level he will get what he deserves, jail time and alot of blokes showing him first hand just how it feels only this time he'll be on the recieving end. anyway like i said thats all i've got to say.
Originally posted by SickOfLies
"first stone thrown" I havent. and it wasnt just any photo he put his 13 year old daughters face on it. 13yrs old and his an adult = pedo or soon to be pedo. its his daughter = incest or wishes/soon to be incest. so this wrong indeed, is the law supposed to wait till he has enough of just a face and goes for the real thing and destroys not only some poor kids life but that kids familys life and his familys life as well???