It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Court: Dad can paste daughter's face on porn photo

page: 24
39
<< 21  22  23    25  26  27 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 10 2011 @ 02:20 AM
link   

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by Maslo


when you were 14 yrs old and jerked off in your bed at night to the thoughts of your 13 yr old girlfriend or a hot girl at school, were you not committing the same offense?

No, because the issue here is the creation of simulated child porn, not masturbating.


wrong !!! it is exactly the same thing.
While you are masturbating you are
viewing the same images in your head
instead of it being on a computer screen
or printed in a magazine. You are thinking
it instead of actually viewing it. Same thing
it is simulated child porn in your brain.


edit on 6/9/2011 by boondock-saint because: (no reason given)


what they're trying to say is, the age difference makes it less acceptable. a 40 year old man making out with a 13 year old ISN'T the same as two thirteen year old's kissing. not at all.

while i would caution parents about allowing the latter, it isn't as wrong and disturbing. wasn't jesus' mother mary a young teen?




posted on Jun, 10 2011 @ 02:26 AM
link   
Since his wife was the one to alert authorities then I think it is safe to say she has left him. She will divorce him and go to civil court and there it will be decided who gets custody. And im willing to bet they award her custody and not only that deny him visitation At best he will have supervised visitation. But since the child is almost a teenager she will probably ignore the creep during said visitation.

Lets be realistic there is no law that constitutes a crime was committed. If they did rule he broke the law that means they could start throwing people in jail for anything and there is no system at work here. Even if he did go to jail it would not change him and he would be out in a matter of months.

The good news is he will have to go through life exposed and ostracized from society. Imagine how he will be treated in his work place? That is until they find a reason to get rid of him. Life will never be the same for him and that is more punishment then any 30 days in the pokie or what have you. He is the monster that lives "in that house down the street" now. He is Freddy Kruger! He lost his family. And that poor girl will have to deal with the humility and embarrassment unfortunately.



posted on Jun, 10 2011 @ 02:31 AM
link   

Originally posted by Exuberant1
reply to post by boondock-saint
 


You are comparing thoughts from children in the the same grade with simulated childporn by an adult.

I think you need to rethink your strategy here.





If bad Photoshopping was a crime.. lol.. offensive avatars alone would cause the justice system to fail!..

"Well!!.. I NEVER did anything that perverted and sick with Photoshop or PSP!!..".. uh, yeah, you did... and you know you did.



posted on Jun, 10 2011 @ 02:53 AM
link   

Originally posted by B.Morrison
There is another aspect to this which is about what he is letting soak into his subconscious & that the very act of making these pictures is adding fuel to the fire that is the undesired behavior in the first place...the father could very well become worse through these activities, especially if it normalized the scenario for him.


while I was at work today I kept thinking about this story & the theories I posted earlier and I have to say that I think that this guy was more likely worsening his problem rather then treating it & that I had probably been a bit hasty earlier when I was drawing comparisons between the father in this story and people with OCD. I'm not a psychologist nor do I know much about OCD so I can't really comment on this guys psychology, cause of the behavior or appropriate treatment.

It's a sad story for many reason & while I disagree that he should have received jail time for his actions I think at the least he should be made to seek professional help from whoever appropriate to help him deal with whatever is causing this behavior & hopefully achieve a positive outcome for the family.

Peace,
-Bob



posted on Jun, 10 2011 @ 03:12 AM
link   

Originally posted by badw0lf
He's no less a deviant, just has not broken the law..

THE WORST SORT.


Eeeh... exactly, THE WORST SORT!

Those that have not broken the law!

Let's put him in Guantanamo, with the others that have not broken the law but that we don't want running around loose!

Or we apply the old "An Eye for an Eye", let her masturbate to a photo of her dad pasted on the body of a Chippendale...
edit on 10-6-2011 by Heliocentric because: The moment two bubbles are united, they both vanish. A lotus blooms.



posted on Jun, 10 2011 @ 03:55 AM
link   
He may not have broken any laws,but if some sick perverted prick did this with a pic of my daughter i would respect his rights,the right to bleed the right to bruise and the right to be knocked out,



posted on Jun, 10 2011 @ 04:02 AM
link   
On a forum largely dedicated to exposing the evils of totalitarian government control, it's mind boggling how many people in this thread can't see how giving the government thought-police power is infinitely worse than one perverted guy whose life is already destroyed just by this info coming out.

I won't even get into a more in-depth discussion on the matter, because most people are incapable of a rational discussion on the topic. But in short, NO ONE has a right to tell someone what they can and can't THINK, and NO ONE has the right to punish someone for what they MIGHT DO.



posted on Jun, 10 2011 @ 04:08 AM
link   
I haven't read the thread but I support the folk who are doubtless calling for his beating and worse and don't support those that are doubtless saying he isn't an incestuous paedophile because the body wasn't his daughters and wanking to an altered image isn't paedophilia.

Any relative of mine who committed these acts would soon not be a relative.



posted on Jun, 10 2011 @ 04:20 AM
link   
There are a lot of weird and very disturbing posts on this thread.

bodock-saint and crew basically supporting the father in this instance.. you're disgusting. I don't think it's any coincidence that the catholic church is riddled with paedo's and BS happens to be a bible basher himself.

Anyone who doesn't think this topic is highly, disgustingly vile, and who doesn't think the father deserves a good old smacking, in my book is very out of touch.



posted on Jun, 10 2011 @ 04:37 AM
link   

Originally posted by Observer99
On a forum largely dedicated to exposing the evils of totalitarian government control, it's mind boggling how many people in this thread can't see how giving the government thought-police power is infinitely worse than one perverted guy whose life is already destroyed just by this info coming out.

.


That's a stance I support, in this kind of case the punishment should be err an ad hoc community based affair.



posted on Jun, 10 2011 @ 04:55 AM
link   

Originally posted by Thepreye
That's a stance I support, in this kind of case the punishment should be err an ad hoc community based affair.


So you're gonna do what? Form a lynch mob and kill or castrate someone? And why -- cause he looked at pictures you don't approve of? Or is it because you're afraid of what he MIGHT do? Either way it's not defensible. You seriously need to get some perspective. There's probably at least 100,000 people in the world that deserve a lynch mob more than this guy. But if I named any of them, or advocated it, then the real thought police would be after ME.



posted on Jun, 10 2011 @ 04:57 AM
link   

Originally posted by Thepreye

Originally posted by Observer99
On a forum largely dedicated to exposing the evils of totalitarian government control, it's mind boggling how many people in this thread can't see how giving the government thought-police power is infinitely worse than one perverted guy whose life is already destroyed just by this info coming out.

.


That's a stance I support, in this kind of case the punishment should be err an ad hoc community based affair.


Count me in!

I got a bunch of ball bats in my trunk and a full tank



posted on Jun, 10 2011 @ 05:00 AM
link   

Originally posted by B.Morrison

Originally posted by B.Morrison

It's a sad story for many reason & while I disagree that he should have received jail time for his actions I think at the least he should be made to seek professional help from whoever appropriate to help him deal with whatever is causing this behavior & hopefully achieve a positive outcome for the family.

Peace,
-Bob


The only person who should be considered in any 'positive outcome' is his daughter. He has no family now. He has no rights to see her again, to communicate with her, he gave up any rights when he created mastubatory images involving his daughter. Any court that gives him visitation when his daughter knows he was wanking over her image is not doing it's job.

This creep turned an image of an adult woman into a facimile of his daughter, and then used it, possibly even shared it. He should have gone to prison.



posted on Jun, 10 2011 @ 05:03 AM
link   
reply to post by Observer99
 


So you don't think the child's uncles or grandparents should punish this gross transgression against the child nature intends for them to protect, looking after our kids is how humanity got where we are, I'm glad you weren't one of the folk protecting me when I was a child.

At the very least he should have nonce tattooed roughly on his forehead and cheeks.

Any way there would be no need for violence, I reckon given half an hour in his company I could persuade the twat that suicide was painless without once raising my voice, he'd probably thank me as I walked out of the room.
edit on 10-6-2011 by Thepreye because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 10 2011 @ 05:06 AM
link   
Jesus %R$#@#$@# Christ, are you kidding me? Stop referring to a book to look what to do and throw the damn man in jail or at least away from his daughter, he is obviously sick.

Using morality in law would prove to be beneficial financially and time wise.



posted on Jun, 10 2011 @ 05:09 AM
link   

Originally posted by gandhi
he is obviously sick.


What do we do with sick people? Give them help, or string them up in the nearest tree?



posted on Jun, 10 2011 @ 05:12 AM
link   

Originally posted by StealthyKat
reply to post by TheOrangeBrood
 


So according to that logic, we should say that snuff films should be legal so serial killers have an outlet for thier "frustrations"?

We have those awful gore films and other violent media for that, no need to bring actual snuff films into the equation. There's actually a lot of business in catering to those who enjoy gore, ironically.

Pasting a child's face onto an adult's body ≠ footage of child abuse
Indulgent gore in media ≠ actual snuff films

Each disgust me to be honest, but it is right for there to be a legal distinction. It comes down to whether or not there is actually a victim.



posted on Jun, 10 2011 @ 05:15 AM
link   

Originally posted by gandhi
Jesus %R$#@#$@# Christ, are you kidding me? Stop referring to a book to look what to do and throw the damn man in jail or at least away from his daughter, he is obviously sick.

Using morality in law would prove to be beneficial financially and time wise.

When morality and emotion takes the place of the book of law, then it opens the way for lynch mobs and vigilante justice, and doesn't allow for fair trials, so innocents may be wrongly harmed. There's a good reason why the law is outlined the way it is currently.



posted on Jun, 10 2011 @ 05:17 AM
link   

Originally posted by torturekiller2006
The one thing that REALLY disturbs me is, how long is it going to take this "man" from fantasizing about his daughter to actually acting out his fantasy. It'll only take one little revelation on his part and he could end up raping his child!! My only hope is that Child Services take his daughter away from him before something bad happens to her.


It's amazing the number of things that people think about, fantasize about etc. etc. that they would never dream of actually doing in a million years.

The photoshopping was a depiction of fantasy. I expect if we got to see depictions of your fantasies you'd be pretty damn embarassed and not so quick to judge people simply based on such things.
edit on 10-6-2011 by SevenBeans because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 10 2011 @ 05:22 AM
link   
reply to post by Heliocentric
 


You cant help child molesters. Im not one for vigilante justice, but given the choice, Ild go with the 'nonce' tattoo someone suggested, and a bit of castration.




top topics



 
39
<< 21  22  23    25  26  27 >>

log in

join