It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Court: Dad can paste daughter's face on porn photo

page: 19
39
<< 16  17  18    20  21  22 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 9 2011 @ 06:06 PM
link   
Paedos, they tend to be control-freaks (hence the need to ruin children's lives, in a bid to make them as miserable as their own)..they tend to be self-important narcissists, with he personality of an evil teenager! People who justify this sick mans fetish need to evaluate their morality. This is inexcusable, seriously seek help from mental health professionals if you want to down play this crime. Legally he committed no crime, but he committed an crime of ethics. He victimized his child psychologically! Imagine how that child will feel the rest of her life? Had he done this with photos of some child's face he cut out of a magazine his child would not have been emotionally and mentally violated! This PIG is a potential child molester in the making! Unless he finds a woman with a childs face like his daughter


The pig is a text book pedo and DHS should see he never sees his child again!


en.wikipedia.org...

As a medical diagnosis, pedophilia (or paedophilia) is defined as a psychiatric disorder in adults or late adolescents (persons age 16 or older) typically characterized by a primary or exclusive sexual interest in prepubescent children (generally age 13 years or younger, though onset of puberty may vary). The child must be at least five years younger in the case of adolescent pedophiles (16 or older) to be classified as pedophilia.[1][2][3][4] The word comes from the Greek: παῖς (paîs), meaning "child," and φιλία (philía), "friendly love" or "friendship,"[5] though this literal meaning has been altered toward sexual attraction in modern times, under the titles "child love" or "child lover," by pedophiles who use symbols and codes to identify their preferences.[6][7] The International Classification of Diseases (ICD) defines pedophilia as a "disorder of adult personality and behaviour" in which there is a sexual preference for children of prepubertal or early pubertal age.[8] The term has a range of definitions as found in psychiatry, psychology, the vernacular, and law enforcement.

edit on 9-6-2011 by Unknown Soldier because: (no reason given)




posted on Jun, 9 2011 @ 06:08 PM
link   

Originally posted by StealthyKat
reply to post by thedarktower
 


I second that! I am just sick of hearing the pathetic excuses for this kind of garbage.


Third here. I know everyone is different and there is a saying, to each their own, but I just cannot agree with a lot of members thinking on this one. This thread disgusts me (No offense to the OP).



posted on Jun, 9 2011 @ 06:09 PM
link   
reply to post by TheOrangeBrood
 


I'm sorry, but I disagree. Yes....total abstinence is needed.....TOTAL. That means not looking at or possessing child porn PERIOD. Just typing the words "child" and "porn" together makes me furious. Looking at child porn does not stop them from offending, it's like throwing gasoline on a fire.. If anything, I think it increases the chance they will offend in real life. If you are a drug addict, you can't be in an environment where there are drugs, or people who will tell you "I know you're an addict, but you can smoke one joint and it won't hurt you".....that is just not reality. It doesn't work that way. The reality is that if these guys have access to child porn, it fuels the fire. Porn and sex addiction (especially deviant sex addiction) is just like drug addiction. Letting them create and possess child porn is not the answer.



posted on Jun, 9 2011 @ 06:09 PM
link   

Originally posted by Partygirl

Court: Dad can paste daughter's face on porn photo


www.sfgate.com


A Milpitas [California] man who used a computer to paste photos of his 13-year-old daughter's head onto bodies of women in graphic poses shouldn't have been convicted of possessing child pornography because the pictures didn't show minors engaging in sex acts, a state appeals court ruled Wednesday.
(visit the link for the full news article)



What a sick thing to do, I bet it's more common than we'd like to think. This world can be an ugly place.



posted on Jun, 9 2011 @ 06:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by neo96
its sick on so many levels.

if you condone those actions then you are no better than those pedophiles.


I never 'condoned' anything.

Just like I don't 'condone' Lady GaGa's promiscuous "dancing".

Or fat women wearing tight clothes.

It's all physically revolting.

It doesn't mean it should be illegal.

The last thing we need is us paying to keep more people in prison for crimes with no victim. (And no, I'm not talking about this man who actually committed multiple ACTUAL crimes and should be in prison)
edit on 9-6-2011 by TheOrangeBrood because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 9 2011 @ 06:13 PM
link   
Yikes that is truly strange. What is wrong with people now a days. I haven't looked at the comments yet but I shutter thinking about the defenders. There is always one or two people who will defend the stupidest acts. What is going on with the Judicial system?!



posted on Jun, 9 2011 @ 06:16 PM
link   

Originally posted by thedarktower
wait a god damn minute here. There are actually people on this site saying he didn't do anything that bad????


He put his own 13 yr old DAUGHTERS face on that of a porn actor and some think its not that big a deal, or just because there is no law for it its not that bad???

are you F-ing kidding me?

This is sick, he clearly has sexual desires about young girls, and his own daughter, what kind of sick man does that? I'll tell you, its a peodophile that who.

Defending this scumbag and saying things like, well when you were 13 didn't you jerk of to class mate is not even in the same league.

the reaction to this article from a small minority on ATS has sickened me to the same degree as the man that did this to his own child


EXACTLY



I had no idea how many perverts were on this site


I know now to avoid these sickos from now on



posted on Jun, 9 2011 @ 06:17 PM
link   
reply to post by TheOrangeBrood
 


yeah well bad thoughts lead to bad behavior that leads to bad actions that tend to result in criminal actions.

and past actions are indictive of future actions.

and they have a place for those people its called prison

case in point people knew that the fort hood shooter was a bad person who had bad thoughts and finally committed bad actions that resulted in criminal actions.

some people are a menace to society and laws exist for the safety and security of the rest of us.



i wonder why you took that personally i called noone out by name................hmmm



posted on Jun, 9 2011 @ 06:20 PM
link   
reply to post by TheOrangeBrood
 


Lady GaGa's "dancing" or a fat person wearing tight clothes does not damage a person for life. Child rape and exploitation DOES. It does not even matter whether they do it physically or just look at the porn....BOTH involves damaging children. A person who looks at this crap is just as guilty of harming children IMO, because there were children hurt to MAKE the pictures....so it all comes back to the same thing. Anyone viewing this garbage is supporting the harm of children. Innocent kids are harmed by this, no matter what the form or "level of participation" is.



posted on Jun, 9 2011 @ 06:20 PM
link   
All I can say is EEEEEWWWWWW!!!!! wtf if any male can say his daughter is pretty enough to jerk off to they should not have the kid PERIOD!!!!!How many dads say oh yes I wanna stroke to my kids pic posted on another frame cuz if she looked like that???!!!(his thought) I'd have her kid or not ..............
OMG WTF and all the valley girl s####



posted on Jun, 9 2011 @ 06:22 PM
link   
reply to post by neo96
 


That is what I think as well. The first step to an action is THOUGHT. People don't fantasize about things they don't like and wish they could do...know what I mean?



posted on Jun, 9 2011 @ 06:22 PM
link   
^ I guess that means you really want to dress up in skin tight latex catsuits and go commit grand larceny murder and extortion at the point of a whip too then huh catwoman

look at all of this point at other people hypocrisy - I know of more than a few women that have had rather lurid fantasies about parents but lack the technical skill to translate them into Photoshop - maybe they should be killed by the punisher too.

If you know your history well enough your aware incest is a practice used by royal familys since ever to maintain a blood line as instructed by god it's claimed and is still played out today in some regard maybe the terminator should nuke all of them

if the guy didnt break the law he didnt break the law there is enough really screwed up things that people do that are illegal we should focus on before trying to make everything else illegal.
edit on 9-6-2011 by circuitsports because: (no reason given)

edit on 9-6-2011 by circuitsports because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 9 2011 @ 06:25 PM
link   
Good. Itd be even more of a police state if he was thrown in jail. Look, obviously its perverse and messed up, but literally no one is harmed by pasting her face on some photos. People have a right to have perverted sick fantasies, as long as they dont act on them and harm others. He should probably be sent to some therapy and child services should definitely examine the case to make sure hes not abused the daughter and maybe be prevented from seeing her and so on, but he didn't commit a crime and should not be put in jail. Whats next after a photoshop fantasy crime? Thought crimes? O, the fantasy of incest crossed your mind, o you looked at your underage sisters/daughters boobs when she was in a bikini at the beach, 10 years in prison!!
edit on 9-6-2011 by darkest4 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 9 2011 @ 06:26 PM
link   
reply to post by StealthyKat
 


yeah i do a stupid judge deemed his action was not illegal now those people know and what if he escalates

and does something to his daughter or someone elses child and they did nothing to prevent that.

people made the wrong call



posted on Jun, 9 2011 @ 06:27 PM
link   

Originally posted by StealthyKat
reply to post by TheOrangeBrood
 


I'm sorry, but I disagree. Yes....total abstinence is needed.....TOTAL. That means not looking at or possessing child porn PERIOD. Just typing the words "child" and "porn" together makes me furious. Looking at child porn does not stop them from offending, it's like throwing gasoline on a fire.. If anything, I think it increases the chance they will offend in real life. If you are a drug addict, you can't be in an environment where there are drugs, or people who will tell you "I know you're an addict, but you can smoke one joint and it won't hurt you".....that is just not reality. It doesn't work that way. The reality is that if these guys have access to child porn, it fuels the fire. Porn and sex addiction (especially deviant sex addiction) is just like drug addiction. Letting them create and possess child porn is not the answer.


There is not child porn here, so what exactly are you going on about? No child was photographed nude... no victim, no crime. period. He needs some moral advising, but you can't just go around throwing people in the slammer for non-crimes.
edit on 9-6-2011 by TheOrangeBrood because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 9 2011 @ 06:28 PM
link   
Lets hope the authorities are monitoring him closely and protecting not only his daughter but him as well because once word gets round in the community, he's a dead man. I'll bet there'd be at least one angry guy willing to go to jail to make sure this dude doesn't get any ideas of being above the law now he's been set free with no charge.



posted on Jun, 9 2011 @ 06:28 PM
link   
In the good old days this scum bag would have been lynched! This case walks a fine line, a grey area of intent of pedophilia and incest. This is one of those things we learn from and then enact a law to combat it. I mean they make laws every day for all kinds of petty things and people like this are walking our streets. A ticking time bomb so to speak. If I was to draw photos of shooting people at my school as a teenager I certainly would be under a microscope!

Im interested to learn what becomes of his family status after this. If DHS (Dep of Human Services) or child protective services that handle these things "IF" they will step in and what the mother has to say?

If she is a strong woman, unfortunately some women and mothers let this kind of thing happen and look the other way. And yeah it probably is more common then we think. Truly disturbing

edit on 9-6-2011 by Unknown Soldier because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 9 2011 @ 06:30 PM
link   

Originally posted by darkest4
Good. Itd be even more of a police state if he was thrown in jail. Look, obviously its perverse and messed up, but literally no one is harmed by the action described here. People have a right to have perverted sick fantasies, as long as they dont act on them and harm others. He should probably be sent to some therapy and child services should definitely examine the case to make sure hes not abused the daughter and so on, but he didn't commit a crime and should not be put in jail. Whats next? Thought crimes? O, the thought of incest crossed your mind, o you looked at your sisters boobs when she was in a bikini, 10 years in prison!
edit on 9-6-2011 by darkest4 because: (no reason given)


I actually agree in part with that.

There are consensual incest couples out there of various pairings but as long as it stays private, both parties agree to it and those involved are of legal age then I'm fine with it if that's what they wanna do. Just keep children out of it.



posted on Jun, 9 2011 @ 06:30 PM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 


WOW.... I honestly feel sorry for you....



posted on Jun, 9 2011 @ 06:32 PM
link   

Originally posted by StealthyKat
reply to post by TheOrangeBrood
 


Lady GaGa's "dancing" or a fat person wearing tight clothes does not damage a person for life. Child rape and exploitation DOES.


Good thing that NONE OF THIS IS WHAT WE ARE TALKING ABOUT.

Having someones face pasted onto a pornographic adult's picture is not damaging anyone's life.

Until of course you get the zealous people who expose the daughter to this crap.


edit on 9-6-2011 by TheOrangeBrood because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
39
<< 16  17  18    20  21  22 >>

log in

join