It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
Originally posted by smithjustinb
I'm talking about physical dimensions. There is obviously length width and height that come together to make 3 dimensions. I agree. There is only self, but I am not you from a 3d perspective, I am you from a 4d perspective. Each dimension is an aspect of Self.
A dimension is the range of data in anything measured. Temperature is a dimension. Color gradient is a dimension. There is no "The Fourth Dimension".
So exactly which dimension are you referring to with you claim to be "from a 4D perspective"?
Originally posted by onequestion
reply to post by smithjustinb
There is dimensions that exist within the complexity of your mind and your thoughts. This does not represent a plain of existance. This is just a level of complexity at which you allow your mind to function at.
Originally posted by smithjustinb
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
Originally posted by smithjustinb
I'm talking about physical dimensions. There is obviously length width and height that come together to make 3 dimensions. I agree. There is only self, but I am not you from a 3d perspective, I am you from a 4d perspective. Each dimension is an aspect of Self.
A dimension is the range of data in anything measured. Temperature is a dimension. Color gradient is a dimension. There is no "The Fourth Dimension".
So exactly which dimension are you referring to with you claim to be "from a 4D perspective"?
di·men·sion
/dɪˈmɛnʃən, daɪ-/ Show Spelled[dih-men-shuhn, dahy-] Show IPA
–noun
1.
Mathematics .
a.
a property of space; extension in a given direction: A straight line has one dimension, a parallelogram has two dimensions, and a parallelepiped has three dimensions.
*Credit- dictionary.com
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
Originally posted by smithjustinb
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
Originally posted by smithjustinb
I'm talking about physical dimensions. There is obviously length width and height that come together to make 3 dimensions. I agree. There is only self, but I am not you from a 3d perspective, I am you from a 4d perspective. Each dimension is an aspect of Self.
A dimension is the range of data in anything measured. Temperature is a dimension. Color gradient is a dimension. There is no "The Fourth Dimension".
So exactly which dimension are you referring to with you claim to be "from a 4D perspective"?
di·men·sion
/dɪˈmɛnʃən, daɪ-/ Show Spelled[dih-men-shuhn, dahy-] Show IPA
–noun
1.
Mathematics .
a.
a property of space; extension in a given direction: A straight line has one dimension, a parallelogram has two dimensions, and a parallelepiped has three dimensions.
*Credit- dictionary.com
Thanks for that. Now could you answer my question, please?
So exactly which dimension are you referring to with you claim to be "from a 4D perspective"?
Originally posted by smithjustinb
I'll try.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
This is the most physical explanation I can give you of it.
This is how to understand higher dimensions w/o attaching yourself to the aspect of it all. When you see the 4d as your self, you understand that 3d universe is your creation and we are all one.
Originally posted by onequestion
reply to post by traditionaldrummer
Here is the creation for you. Look around you, what do you see?
In this post, you ignore the fact that in order for you to interface objective reality, your mind must subjectively mirror, or create within itself this reality for you to experience.
Science is only the what, if that. This does not explain the why, or the how(completely its trying).
Dimensions are just a cosmic measuring scale used for different theories applied to the base fundamental idea of that theory to try and help explain it. They aren't real.edit on 9-6-2011 by onequestion because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by onequestion
You refuse with your scientificlly proven theories to extropolate how we are able to know what we are experiencing. How do we percieve reality? Whats responsible for observation? Don't say the brain, because the brain is gravely misunderstood, or not understood at all. Or if you wan't to say the brain, then explain how it works on a base fundamental level, explain consciousness, and the awareness it requires to be conscious.
Originally posted by onequestion
You science minds will never get it.
Its so useless. You have no idea what the base fundamental building block of consciousness is, or how we are able to observe. Consciousness is not some DNA related chemical process. I know i took that class in anthropology to. Please explain for me creativity through a brain inducing chemical process. And please don't say '___', or saratonin. If '___', or saratonin, or positive ions, or any of this nonsense were responsible for relaying creative information, and the formation of new ideas we would be able to extract those ideas from the DNA, or proteins or whatever it is you think is responsible for the act of creation as we saw fit.
CREATION EXIST BECAUSE I CAN CREATE MY OWN IDEAS WHENEVER I WANT.
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
Sure, things get created by humans and other living things. That in no way implies that the universe itself is a creation.
So you don't think the universe was created?
Even things like chemicals can be created by other chemical reactions. You don't think the universe just popped up out of nothing do you? I thought it was a law of thermodynamics that energy can neither be created or destroyed, just transmuted from one form to another. Then all the energy that's here, must have been here "forever" and there never was a time when it was not.