It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Background
In 1896, Theodor Herzl, a Jewish journalist living in Austria-Hungary, published Der Judenstaat ("The Jewish State"), in which he asserted that the only solution to the "Jewish Question" in Europe, including growing antisemitism, was through the establishment of a Jewish State.
Political Zionism had just been born.[6] A year later, Herzl founded the Zionist Organization (ZO), which at its first congress, "called for the establishment of a home for the Jewish people in Palestine secured under public law".
Serviceable means to attain that goal included the promotion of Jewish settlement there, the organization of Jews in the diaspora, the strengthening of Jewish feeling and consciousness, and preparatory steps to attain those necessary governmental grants.
By the end of the First World War, Great Britain had the British Mandate for Palestine. The issuance of the Balfour Declaration greatly increased the immigration of Jews to Palestine. In 1947, Great Britain decided to turn its Mandate over to the United Nations, which, in the same year, adopted Resolution 181, partitioning the land into two states, one Arab and one Jewish......
In 1919 the General Secretary (and future President) of the Zionist Organization, Nahum Sokolow, published a History of Zionism (1600-1918). Sokolow represented the Zionist Organization at the Paris Peace Conference. He explained:
The object of Zionism is to establish for the Jewish people a home in Palestine secured by public law." ... ...It has been said and is still being obstinately repeated by anti-Zionists again and again, that Zionism aims at the creation of an independent "Jewish State" But this is wholly fallacious. The "Jewish State" was never part of the Zionist programme. The Jewish State was the title of Herzl's first pamphlet, which had the supreme merit of forcing people to think. This pamphlet was followed by the first Zionist Congress, which accepted the Basle programme - the only programme in existence.
Originally posted by Dr Expired
Originally posted by AshleyD
I guess it's not too surprising. Hitler started writing Mein Kamph just a few years later which was rife with antisemitic rhetoric. I'm sure the seeds had been planted before that. In one of his biographies, I think the root of his hate developed in his college years in Austria.
On an 'mindless trivia' note, his signature is interesting. The way it trails off is a sign of anger and being mentally disturbed. I guess that goes without saying, though.
You may be right , but sometimes it as if History explaining Hitler as a madman is devoid of any intellectual integrity...his family Doctor was Jewish, many of the richest Industrialists in Germany even during the war were Jewish?
Not all Jews were sent to camps? Some lived out the war years in occupied Europe untouched?
I for one do not believe he was mad, he was a warrior who set out to make Germany the Ruler of Europe and beyond, just as Napoleon ( a Jew) set out to do for France.
Iam not a supporter of Hitler but neither do I beleieve the easy answers.
no one man rises to power without support, and many people of varying backgrounds/ Religions backed Hitler even after mein Kampf was published.
Some believe he was encouraged and backed to thwart the scheming murderous Stalin, that it was he who was double crossed by rthe crafty Brits, who were staring down the barrel of a rampant Red revolution in Europe.
Out of the war the Jews got a homeland, Britain lost its superfical empire, and the USA and Russia got the spoils.?
Germany got destroyed .
Originally posted by Regenstorm
reply to post by Siddharta
There are no gas chambers in Wiesel's book, according to him people in Auschwitz were thrown alive into a large fire. He writes that he prefers to throw himself into the electric fences instead of being burned alive.
„Es wird hier ein ziemlich barbarisches und nicht näher zu beschreibendes Verfahren angewandt, und von den Juden selbst bleibt nicht mehr viel übrig.“
Originally posted by jonnywhite
Evidence should come out not too long from now that will blow the lid off of it. Anybody who denies right now the holocaust is going to be the biggest fool on earth. We told you for decades what happened, and you denied it. Your forked tongue does not hide your thoughts and deeds. Sir, there will come a day when you will no longer deny. You will no longer dirty. You will no longer hide. Do you look forward to this day? Or do you cower in fear of the light, of the truth?
It's said that the truth will set us free. But not everyone wants to be free.
For them the truth is asinine, it's poisonous. The light burns them, the truth tortures their soul.edit on 9-6-2011 by jonnywhite because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by sapien82
So either the nazi's were very maticulous in cleaning their tracks so to speak, that they left no trace behind of any documentation as to the removal of Jews and other humans by mass genocide.
Or they never bothered to document it , and just decided they could order it without the need for pieces of paper?
Either way it seems very strange ,surely there would be hundreds of paper orders documenting the extermination of the jews . after all didnt the nazi's record all of their insane experiments of humans ? Yet they manage not to record the systematic killing of millions of people.
- en.auschwitz.org.pl...
Today, few people know that the Mauthausen prisoner card file and other records from the camp, occupying 11 meters of shelf space, have been in the Auschwitz-Birkenau State Museum Archives for 50 years.
Either way there are parts of the 2nd world war , that still remain a mystery to me !
Originally posted by DuceizBack
Originally posted by Dr Expired
Originally posted by AshleyD
I guess it's not too surprising. Hitler started writing Mein Kamph just a few years later which was rife with antisemitic rhetoric. I'm sure the seeds had been planted before that. In one of his biographies, I think the root of his hate developed in his college years in Austria.
On an 'mindless trivia' note, his signature is interesting. The way it trails off is a sign of anger and being mentally disturbed. I guess that goes without saying, though.
You may be right , but sometimes it as if History explaining Hitler as a madman is devoid of any intellectual integrity...his family Doctor was Jewish, many of the richest Industrialists in Germany even during the war were Jewish?
Not all Jews were sent to camps? Some lived out the war years in occupied Europe untouched?
I for one do not believe he was mad, he was a warrior who set out to make Germany the Ruler of Europe and beyond, just as Napoleon ( a Jew) set out to do for France.
Iam not a supporter of Hitler but neither do I beleieve the easy answers.
no one man rises to power without support, and many people of varying backgrounds/ Religions backed Hitler even after mein Kampf was published.
Some believe he was encouraged and backed to thwart the scheming murderous Stalin, that it was he who was double crossed by rthe crafty Brits, who were staring down the barrel of a rampant Red revolution in Europe.
Out of the war the Jews got a homeland, Britain lost its superfical empire, and the USA and Russia got the spoils.?
Germany got destroyed .
This got is obviously racist.
Second line.
Originally posted by starwarsisreal
Hmmmm we should go back to his war days to see the origins of his hatred for Jews. I'm sure some kind of event made him hate them
Originally posted by Siddharta
Originally posted by Regenstorm
reply to post by Siddharta
There are no gas chambers in Wiesel's book, according to him people in Auschwitz were thrown alive into a large fire. He writes that he prefers to throw himself into the electric fences instead of being burned alive.
So we have got an author, who admits, that he mixes facts and fiction and many doubt, that he ever was in any camp at all... And his novel is proof of what? That people were thrown into the fire instead of being killed in a gas chamber?
So when Goebbels wrote in his diary -
„Es wird hier ein ziemlich barbarisches und nicht näher zu beschreibendes Verfahren angewandt, und von den Juden selbst bleibt nicht mehr viel übrig.“
("A rather barbaric and not to be described more specifically procedure will be used, and of the Jews themselves there won't be left a lot.")
- he was talking of a good old burning, instead of industrialized murder. Doesn't really make it any better, does it?
But one Münchhausen cannot change all the facts and witnesses.
Eliezer "Elie" Wiesel KBE (English pronunciation: /ˈɛli vɨˈzɛl/; born September 30, 1928)[1] is a Romanian-born Jewish-American[1] writer, professor, political activist, Nobel Laureate, and Holocaust survivor. He is the author of 57 books, including Night, a work based on his experiences as a prisoner in the Auschwitz, Buna, and Buchenwald concentration camps.[2] Wiesel is also the Advisory Board chairman of the Algemeiner Journal newspaper. When Wiesel was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1986, the Norwegian Nobel Committee called him a "messenger to mankind", stating that through his struggle to come to terms with "his own personal experience of total humiliation and of the utter contempt for humanity shown in Hitler's death camps", as well as his "practical work in the cause of peace", Wiesel had delivered a powerful message "of peace, atonement and human dignity" to humanity.[3]
Originally posted by sapien82
but the actual records and orders relationg to the way the prisoners were killed seem to have either not been created to hide the brutality ( doesnt make sense to hide it they were quite open about murder) Or they were destroyed in an attempt to make them look less brutal in the eyes of the world when they came to trial.
Betrifft: Behandlung der Judenfrage Im Auftrag des Führers teile ich mit: Bei der öffentlichen Behandlung der Judenfrage muss Jede Erörterung einer künftigen Gesamtlösung unterbleiben. Es kann jedoch davon gesprochen werden, dass die Juden Geschlossen zu zweckentsprechendem Arbeitseinsatz herangezogen werden.
Originally posted by Regenstorm
Just an author, right...
His story is Male-Cow Manure, just like those of many other supposed witnesses...
Originally posted by sapien82
So hitler order that no one talk about fight club , was this to reduce the chances of the jews discovering their fate ?
Originally posted by Siddharta
Originally posted by Regenstorm
Just an author, right...
His story is Male-Cow Manure, just like those of many other supposed witnesses...
Your argumentation doesn't make quiet sense to me: You are trying to give more weight to Elie Wiesel to prove that an "important" witness did not mention gas chambers at all - but said people were burned alive - and then again call him a liar, concluding that "those many other supposed witnesses" were lying, too.
So the allied troops were ordered to spread that story, freed the people from the camps and instructed them to tell this story to the world? Probably they wrote a curriculum vitae for each and every prisoner.
Instead of trying to rewrite history from one book you find suspicious maybe you should pick one of those families, where many did not survive and try to research, what happened to them.
Maybe you would like to find out, what happened to the members of the Theater der Prominenten, most of them cabaretists, who had fled from Germany to the Netherlands, but were imprisoned after Germany occupied this neighbouring country.
If you take a look at individuals, maybe it is more personally for yourself. Maybe you heard of the "stumble blocks" in German towns. These are little memorial stones infront of houses, where people lived before and disappeared during the Nazi regime. A lot of individuals who's fate is worth to check out.