It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TheWalkingFox
So in other words, blackmail; "Either you surrender your right to self-determination and submit to my authority as a male, or I will leave you and your offspring to swing in the wind." You're asking for either the right to dictate to a woman, or the right to shirk your own responsibilities.
Originally posted by e11888
See now you're just trying to be cute. It matters not if the head was slashed off on the floor or in a bathtub with candles and flower petals. Its still murder nonetheless.
Inferior? Far from it. Women are obviously the stronger of our species and of that I have no doubt. I simply cannot see how a woman can literally ruin a man's entire life by making a single decision but she on the other hand is exempt from all legal repercussions regardless of that choice.
So now it all comes out does it? Is this the reason behind this arguement and why you're so active in these discussions? Is it possible that you never really let that go? It could very well be possible that this is the only way you can deal with it by attempting to justify her actions.
I understand the woman has more at stake, but like I said before, it was her decision not to use birth control (just as it was to not use a condom) and it is a responsibility to both the female and the male.
But let me be clear, to justify the death of a human child by stating that its okay because you didnt know him or her is borderline HITLER type logic. Regardless if its been living for 2 months or 40 years you are still the father.
I havent stated a single lie in this thread.
We are no longer just talking about her body at this point. We are talking about the body of a human child growing in her body that wasnt placed there by herself alone.
When the day comes that females can reproduce on their own will be the day that I will agree with you. But for now, as it takes two human beings to create a child, it should take those same two human beings to destroy it. She is no less responsible for being pregnant than he is for knocking her up.
What part of she is equally responsible for being pregnant dont you understand? Its really not a difficult concept. Ever seen a single father try to work when his regular babysitter is sick? How about when the kid brings home some bug from school?
Children arent an enormous financial burden, they've been raised in everything from tents, cardboard boxes, mud homes, straw homes, wood homes, brick homes, public housing, mansions and castles.
This idea of raising a child isnt something new and exciting.
Its easier for a man to walk out on a woman? Because last I checked you go to jail when you do that and dont pay child support..... but a woman can walk out on a single father and leave the entire family with nothing and the court system wouldnt shed a single tear. Trust me, Im good friends with 2 very loving single fathers.
Yes men get screwed over by the system when it comes to things like this. The problem is, women dont.
Yes because she made the child all on her own. That means its her child. The father means nothing.
I have no idea but I'm not going to back down simply because you can throw out insults and make up your own oppinions to make yourself feel better.
Originally posted by SevenBeans
Originally posted by TheWalkingFox
So in other words, blackmail; "Either you surrender your right to self-determination and submit to my authority as a male, or I will leave you and your offspring to swing in the wind." You're asking for either the right to dictate to a woman, or the right to shirk your own responsibilities.
OMG now that is RICH.
So if I make a unilateral choice and you refuse to help me pay for the results than you're blackmailing me?
The rest of your post is just too silly to bother with.
Originally posted by TheWalkingFox
This is not a difficult concept to grasp.
Originally posted by TheWalkingFox
At conception, both parties are making a tacit agreement; when that kid comes out, they will have mutual obligation as its parents.
Originally posted by TheWalkingFox
Like the previous poster, you're basically arguing that you want the right to demand that a woman carry a kid to term even though you don't plan to care for it after it's born.
Originally posted by CobraCommander
One minute you say the seed is a "gift" the next a responsibility. If I give you a television set does that mean I have to pay your cable bill until the TV wears out?
edit on 10-6-2011 by CobraCommander because: (no reason given)