Aside from her evident intent to become a madam, trafficking in human flesh (slavery) for the purposes of satisfying lust, I can't see any reason why
this woman's point of view merits attention.
I mean there are thousands of pimps in the world (I'm guessing here) who feel no differently than she does. And many of those pimps operate legally
within the legal structures of the countries they live in.
But how does one "buy" a person? Is slavery (the reduction of a human to actual 'object' status) accepted in Sharia law?
Also, who "sells" people? Where does one go to find such a seller?
This seems like a propaganda piece to me. All this can possibly accomplish is to piss off every free human on the planet.
Are her views representative of anyone other than herself?
I suppose if someone were to sell HER she would be OK with that (?). If so, perhaps someone can pony up enough cash to "buy" her and then keep her
off the internet or something..... some might consider that a public service.
Men should be allowed sex slaves and female prisoners could do the job - and all this from a WOMAN p, page 2
reply posted on 7-6-2011 @ 11:48 AM by ColoradoJens
reply to post by UcDat
I hope you are getting a good education...excellent there was not a single point of refutation to the article or the OP's thoughts. Not One. Not a reason why this is acceptable or ortherwise. Just a " well you did this so it's ok" statement. Can I assume you are ALL for the ABSURD ways of Sharia? Or do you just hate the white house? Do you think Sharia is acceptable in countries that have established legal systems already? Where does it stop? In MY religion, none of your laws are apllicable to me. I make em up as I feel. Somedays I'm mean, others, not so much. Kinda depends on how I slept that night. Regardless it is horrific the way humans treat each other, worldwide - no real need to make things even more horrifying by subjugating women to this religion. Check out my thread on women being raped and forced to apologize in CATHOLIC church...See, the issue is religion has decided on a whole that women are somehow inferior. Please don't put that into law.
CJ
I hope you are getting a good education...excellent there was not a single point of refutation to the article or the OP's thoughts. Not One. Not a reason why this is acceptable or ortherwise. Just a " well you did this so it's ok" statement. Can I assume you are ALL for the ABSURD ways of Sharia? Or do you just hate the white house? Do you think Sharia is acceptable in countries that have established legal systems already? Where does it stop? In MY religion, none of your laws are apllicable to me. I make em up as I feel. Somedays I'm mean, others, not so much. Kinda depends on how I slept that night. Regardless it is horrific the way humans treat each other, worldwide - no real need to make things even more horrifying by subjugating women to this religion. Check out my thread on women being raped and forced to apologize in CATHOLIC church...See, the issue is religion has decided on a whole that women are somehow inferior. Please don't put that into law.
CJ
reply posted on 7-6-2011 @ 11:48 AM by bekod
reply to post by Aeons
the sad thing is, it will be just a matter of time before they say this is their religious belief we are denying them to practice, we are not allowing them to fallow their faith. you might say this is not so, i say wait and see, then it will be, told you so.
the sad thing is, it will be just a matter of time before they say this is their religious belief we are denying them to practice, we are not allowing them to fallow their faith. you might say this is not so, i say wait and see, then it will be, told you so.
reply posted on 7-6-2011 @ 11:49 AM by Illusionsaregrander
reply to post by Aeons
I actually sat down once, and tried to figure out why it is that WOMEN are often strong supporters of policies that are horribly anti female, (genital mutilation, murder of unfaithful wives, etc) and what it came down to was, their sons.
Especially in cultures where there is a lot of warfare, and keeping population high is important for survival, like the "cradle of civilization" the Mediterranean and mid eastern region.
Anyway, it boils down to this. A woman has two children, a son and a daughter. No matter what, her daughter is likely to produce no more than one child a year. But a son with many wives can produce many more children a year. If he has ten wives, or one wife and 9 concubines, he can have if all goes well ten children a year. Its the selfish gene. A mother is better served by a roguish son that a loyal daughter in terms of spreading those genes.
And the more oppressive the culture to women, the less likely her son will be supporting children (and genes) that arent his.
Anyway, it may not make you feel better about this woman and what she says, but there is biology that helps to explain it. If your goal is to have "as many offspring as possible" oppressing women is the thing to do. If your population is stable or even too high, women having freedom works in favor of the culture/society. As Edward O Wilson pointed out, women everywhere they can have spontaneously lowered their birthrate to 2.1 children per woman.
A female, since birth and rearing a child is more costly to her, tends to prefer fewer children, with a higher quality mate, rather than many children from a mate she has no say over choosing.
As long as there is rampant war in that region, and there is no consequence for overbreeding, cultural practices that favor the intense pumping out of babies will prevail. And many of them will be female unfriendly of necessity.
I actually sat down once, and tried to figure out why it is that WOMEN are often strong supporters of policies that are horribly anti female, (genital mutilation, murder of unfaithful wives, etc) and what it came down to was, their sons.
Especially in cultures where there is a lot of warfare, and keeping population high is important for survival, like the "cradle of civilization" the Mediterranean and mid eastern region.
Anyway, it boils down to this. A woman has two children, a son and a daughter. No matter what, her daughter is likely to produce no more than one child a year. But a son with many wives can produce many more children a year. If he has ten wives, or one wife and 9 concubines, he can have if all goes well ten children a year. Its the selfish gene. A mother is better served by a roguish son that a loyal daughter in terms of spreading those genes.
And the more oppressive the culture to women, the less likely her son will be supporting children (and genes) that arent his.
Anyway, it may not make you feel better about this woman and what she says, but there is biology that helps to explain it. If your goal is to have "as many offspring as possible" oppressing women is the thing to do. If your population is stable or even too high, women having freedom works in favor of the culture/society. As Edward O Wilson pointed out, women everywhere they can have spontaneously lowered their birthrate to 2.1 children per woman.
A female, since birth and rearing a child is more costly to her, tends to prefer fewer children, with a higher quality mate, rather than many children from a mate she has no say over choosing.
As long as there is rampant war in that region, and there is no consequence for overbreeding, cultural practices that favor the intense pumping out of babies will prevail. And many of them will be female unfriendly of necessity.
reply posted on 7-6-2011 @ 11:49 AM by Ophiuchus 13
reply to post by Aeons
This is what 1 thinks of this idea Aeons--
LAUCE smh S&F for the update on EA ignorance
Be well
This is what 1 thinks of this idea Aeons--
LAUCE smh S&F for the update on EA ignorance
Be well
edit on 6/7/11 by Ophiuchus 13 because: (no reason given)
reply posted on 7-6-2011 @ 11:50 AM by Aeons
reply to post by Antiquated1
If I could read their minds, and selectively only pick out the ones like this and have them all have an instantaneous fatal heart attack....I would.
As it is, this pathology is deep and infectious and the wound needs to be cauterized.
If I could read their minds, and selectively only pick out the ones like this and have them all have an instantaneous fatal heart attack....I would.
As it is, this pathology is deep and infectious and the wound needs to be cauterized.
reply posted on 7-6-2011 @ 11:52 AM by gabby2011
Originally posted by aceto
reply to post by SpectreDC
But you are an idiot.. and you did say it. Thus making you a hypocrite..
Why do you have to jump all over her , for speaking out against very cruel and inhumane treatment. I'm sure she didn't mean she would like to kill all of them ...and I think what she was referring to is how dangerous their mindsets can be , and just wanted that type of thinking removed from the planet. Who wouldn't want that?
You seem to not be upset about it? maybe you'll think differently if your daughter is ever taken prisoner in Kuwait someday.
reply posted on 7-6-2011 @ 11:53 AM by boondock-saint
reply to post by Aeons
Aeons
you support this don't you know??? or did you ???
whenever you buy a tank full of gas
for your car, about 1/10 of that money goes
directly to the Royal Family of Saudi Arabia.
King Fasal has a harem of 20 wives as sex
slaves. So when you buy gasoline, you are
contributing to that which you despise.
Aeons
you support this don't you know??? or did you ???
whenever you buy a tank full of gas
for your car, about 1/10 of that money goes
directly to the Royal Family of Saudi Arabia.
King Fasal has a harem of 20 wives as sex
slaves. So when you buy gasoline, you are
contributing to that which you despise.
reply posted on 7-6-2011 @ 11:56 AM by Aeons
reply to post by boondock-saint
I highly doubt any of the world's supply of petroleum is being "shipped" to my area, since I live in the area that is producing most of what you are using and all of what I use.
I highly doubt any of the world's supply of petroleum is being "shipped" to my area, since I live in the area that is producing most of what you are using and all of what I use.
reply posted on 7-6-2011 @ 11:58 AM by JR MacBeth
reply to post by boondock-saint
Boondock, that's a slight exaggeration.
He's a good Muslim, so only four of those count as "wives".
As for the rest? I'm sure they're just not considered quite as lucky as the first four.
Interesting culture. Sort of could make a person jealous, in a way.
JR
King Fasal has a harem of 20 wives as sex
slaves.
Boondock, that's a slight exaggeration.
He's a good Muslim, so only four of those count as "wives".
As for the rest? I'm sure they're just not considered quite as lucky as the first four.
Interesting culture. Sort of could make a person jealous, in a way.
JR
reply posted on 7-6-2011 @ 12:03 PM by JR MacBeth
reply to post by Maxmars
Maxmars, I checked into it. I sort of liked her red outfit, so thought I'd call over there, see what was up.
Turns out, her husband will pay anyone ten bucks, if they will just take her away!
I'm just not sure it's worth the plane ticket. But, hey, you're right. A public service. That's probably the better way to think about it.
JR
I suppose if someone were to sell HER she would be OK with that (?). If so, perhaps someone can pony up enough cash to "buy" her and then keep her off the internet or something..... some might consider that a public service.
Maxmars, I checked into it. I sort of liked her red outfit, so thought I'd call over there, see what was up.
Turns out, her husband will pay anyone ten bucks, if they will just take her away!
I'm just not sure it's worth the plane ticket. But, hey, you're right. A public service. That's probably the better way to think about it.
JR
Newest topics, updated in real-time:
Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:
Journalist Michael Hastings dies in L.A. car crash (Single car crash??)
Breaking Political News: 16 hours ago, 36 flags
Breaking Political News: 16 hours ago, 36 flags
The NSA is in so much trouble...and here is an example of how.
General Conspiracies: 14 hours ago, 21 flags
General Conspiracies: 14 hours ago, 21 flags
Big Brother alert: Cameras in the cable box to monitor TV viewers
General Chit Chat: 17 hours ago, 16 flags
General Chit Chat: 17 hours ago, 16 flags
Cummings: Full IRS interview shows White House didn’t direct tea party targeting
Breaking Political News: 16 hours ago, 10 flags
Breaking Political News: 16 hours ago, 10 flags
ObamaCare Rule: HHS, IRS Can Share Private Health Information
US Political Madness: 6 hours ago, 8 flags
US Political Madness: 6 hours ago, 8 flags
Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:
Journalist Michael Hastings dies in L.A. car crash (Single car crash??)
Breaking Political News: 16 hours ago, 91 replies
Breaking Political News: 16 hours ago, 91 replies
Cummings: Full IRS interview shows White House didn’t direct tea party targeting
Breaking Political News: 16 hours ago, 45 replies
Breaking Political News: 16 hours ago, 45 replies
Big Brother alert: Cameras in the cable box to monitor TV viewers
General Chit Chat: 17 hours ago, 28 replies
General Chit Chat: 17 hours ago, 28 replies
NYC Council - Stupid Bill Forbidding Cops from Describing Suspects
Other Current Events: 6 hours ago, 20 replies
Other Current Events: 6 hours ago, 20 replies
The Above Top Secret Web sites are a
wholly owned social content community of
The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on
user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership
who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides
a collaborative venue for free expression.
ATS Server: www2.theabovenetwork.com
Header data: 0.002 seconds
Page processed in: 0.185 seconds
wholly owned social content community of
The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on
user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership
who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides
a collaborative venue for free expression.
ATS Server: www2.theabovenetwork.com
Header data: 0.002 seconds
Page processed in: 0.185 seconds
