reply to post by OnTheLevel213
A straight line which follows the right wall of the pyramid exactly does not touch the "m" in "seclorum" but the "u". One has to either
distort the shape of the star to shoehorn the "m" in or completely ignore the pyramid altogether, which seems to defeat the purpose.
Seriously, this will be the second time I've had to explain this... You guys really are special aren't you?
Don't follow the line of the pyramid...
Follow the line of the right side of the triangle that has 'the all seeing eye' within it that is above/detatched from the pyramid...
You know the one, It's the one that is ripe throughout Masonry, follow the line on this symbol that many Masons have addmitted on this thread as
being a symbol they use... and where does it take you...?
Thats right sherlock to the 'M', not to the 'U'....
Are you still with me...?
If you followed the line of the pyramid this would take you to the 'U'... Yes, well done...silver star for you...for effort...
But then it would not make a triangle.... Still here? Or has that pretty colouring book caught your attention...
Without triangles, you can not create a Hexagram, understand...?
Ok, lets try it another way for you...
Take a Hexagram overlay it over the seal...
And what letters do the points on the star point to....
Say it with me now...
M for Mummy
A for Ant
S for Snake
O for Orange (Not apple)
N for No - Brainer
Now...take your thumb out of your mouth and repeat after me...
M - A - S - O - N
See that wasn't so hard now, was it...
Class dismissed...
You just said you had proof.
NO, I said that it has been proven to me, not that I have proof for you...
Because of what I have seen with my eye and what I have heard with my ears I can tell you it has been proven to ME...
YOU are not ME and YOU have not seen what I have seen or have been told what I've been told, so therefore it is only proof for me and NOT you...
I 'could' share what I've seen and been told, but this would still not be proof for you, it would just be my word, do you understand...?
So have I; his "fringe ideas" are about me.
His ideas about you are not fringe, they are becoming common knowledge and are being accepted as fact, especially on sites like this one (see first
reply to thread)...
That doesn't give me license to call him something he isn't.
No of course not, that would be retarded to do so!
But, If it was proven to you that he was/is something that you 'thought' he was not and you then 'knew' for a fact becuase it was proven to you,
would you then have licence to call and/or claim that he was/is that something...?
You totally missed my point, which I can't be arsed to explain to you now...
Do you believe that the Egyptians created Christianity? Or that pirates wrote Shakespeare?
No, I would humour you, but I think you might actually be that ^^ stupid, that is an extremely poor arguement. I'm not going to waste my breath
explaining why, I've dumbed myself down enough for today...
I think I'm done here...